When natural disturbances and anthropogenic stressors interact, non‐perennial reaches become particularly vulnerable to global change: Insights from France
Abstract
Worldwide, more than 50% of river reaches experience flow intermittence and this proportion is increasing due to climate change and water abstraction, with foreseeable impacts on ecosystem function and structure. Concomitantly, multiple anthropogenic impacts associated with land‐use changes are impairing river ecosystems. Evaluating whether and how anthropogenic impacts and flow intermittence interact is paramount to guide ecosystem management in a rapidly changing world. Goal . First, we aimed at testing whether and how the effects of intermittence and anthropogenic stressors on biodiversity interact and secondly to evaluate whether such interactions change depending on the biomonitoring metric employed. Methods . We used a large dataset of French river biomonitoring networks ( n = 545 sites) in which macroinvertebrates were sampled along wide gradients of flow intermittence and multiple anthropogenic stressors. We ran generalized linear models to test the independent and interactive effects of flow intermittence and anthropogenic stressors on both traditional and functional‐based biomonitoring metrics. Main results . We found that most metrics responded interactively to the effects of flow intermittence and anthropogenic stressors, except functional redundancy, which responded only to anthropogenic impacts, showing a single effect. In addition, we observed that both taxonomic and functional diversity metrics of macroinvertebrates are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic stressors in non‐perennial reaches compared with perennial ones. Synthesis and applications . Our results show that functional redundancy provides a consistent indicator of anthropogenic impact across both perennial and non‐perennial rivers. We suggest that incorporating this metric into biomonitoring frameworks could improve the detection of ecological degradation in increasingly intermittent river networks, offering a more robust basis for management and conservation decisions under global change.
Related
- Do anthropogenic disturbances affect the stress physiology and immunity of Liolaemus cuyumhue? The case of an endangered lizard from the Monte Desert of Patagonia
- Root microbiota dynamics of perennial Arabis alpina are dependent on soil residence time but independent of flowering time
- Inferring the perennial biomass and phytoremediation potential of thirty-one woody species from large phytomanagement field trials
- A Dynamical Framework for Identifying Preferred Regions of Exciting Synoptic Disturbances under Varying Background Flows
- Associations between hurricane stressors, social capital, and climate anxiety among individuals who experienced Hurricanes Helene and Milton
BibTeX
@article{cavalcanti2026when,
title = {{When natural disturbances and anthropogenic stressors interact, non‐perennial reaches become particularly vulnerable to global change: Insights from France}},
author = {Victor R Di Cavalcanti and Andros T Gianuca and Julie Crabot and Mathieu Floury and Laurent Valette and Jeremy Piffady and Thibault Datry},
journal = {Journal of Applied Ecology},
year = {2026},
month = aug,
doi = {10.1111/1365-2664.70551},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05843560v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - When natural disturbances and anthropogenic stressors interact, non‐perennial reaches become particularly vulnerable to global change: Insights from France
AU - Victor R Di Cavalcanti
AU - Andros T Gianuca
AU - Julie Crabot
AU - Mathieu Floury
AU - Laurent Valette
AU - Jeremy Piffady
AU - Thibault Datry
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/08/25
JO - Journal of Applied Ecology
DO - 10.1111/1365-2664.70551
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05843560v1
AB - Worldwide, more than 50% of river reaches experience flow intermittence and this proportion is increasing due to climate change and water abstraction, with foreseeable impacts on ecosystem function and structure. Concomitantly, multiple anthropogenic impacts associated with land‐use changes are impairing river ecosystems. Evaluating whether and how anthropogenic impacts and flow intermittence interact is paramount to guide ecosystem management in a rapidly changing world. Goal . First, we aimed at testing whether and how the effects of intermittence and anthropogenic stressors on biodiversity interact and secondly to evaluate whether such interactions change depending on the biomonitoring metric employed. Methods . We used a large dataset of French river biomonitoring networks ( n = 545 sites) in which macroinvertebrates were sampled along wide gradients of flow intermittence and multiple anthropogenic stressors. We ran generalized linear models to test the independent and interactive effects of flow intermittence and anthropogenic stressors on both traditional and functional‐based biomonitoring metrics. Main results . We found that most metrics responded interactively to the effects of flow intermittence and anthropogenic stressors, except functional redundancy, which responded only to anthropogenic impacts, showing a single effect. In addition, we observed that both taxonomic and functional diversity metrics of macroinvertebrates are particularly vulnerable to anthropogenic stressors in non‐perennial reaches compared with perennial ones. Synthesis and applications . Our results show that functional redundancy provides a consistent indicator of anthropogenic impact across both perennial and non‐perennial rivers. We suggest that incorporating this metric into biomonitoring frameworks could improve the detection of ecological degradation in increasingly intermittent river networks, offering a more robust basis for management and conservation decisions under global change.
SN - 0021-8901
SN - 1365-2664
ER -