Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,203 studies31 sourcesUpdated just now
Peer-reviewedCC BYDiscover Soil

Quantification of soil loss by using RUSLE model under different land use and land cover conditions in AKANYARU catchment in Rwanda

5 affiliations
  1. 1Rwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board, RAB
  2. 2University of Rwanda,UR
  3. 3Rwanda Polytechnic-Musanze College
  4. 4Institut d’Enseignement superieur de Ruhengeri
  5. 5Rwanda Institute of conservation Agriculture, RICA

Abstract

This study quantified annual soil loss across the Akanyaru Catchment (3,402 km², Rwanda) under four land use and land cover types forest, agriculture, residential, and bare soil using the RUSLE model integrated with GIS. The Rainfall erosivity (R) is derived from 20 years of daily rainfall data obtained from the NASA database. The Soil erodibility (K) used is from global soil texture data; slope length and steepness (LS) from a 30 m DEM; and cover management (C) from Landsat 8 NDVI. The support practice factor (P) was set to 1.0, reflecting the absence of formal conservation structures in the catchment. The Soil loss range from 0 to 51.4391 t/ha/year. Near zero soil loss occurred under dense forest cover, while the highest rates were concentrated in bare and intensively farmed areas on steep slopes particularly in the northeastern and southwestern sub-catchments. The three RUSLE factors showing greatest spatial variationwere steep topography (LS: 0–1.678), degraded or absent vegetation cover (C: 0.0004–0.524), and high rainfall erosivity (R: 527.507–888.624 MJ·mm·ha⁻¹·h⁻¹·yr⁻¹). Findings call for prioritizing terracing and contour farming on steep agricultural slopes, expanding agroforestry and cover crops to reduce surface exposure, and improving soil organic matter in erodible sandy-silty soils. The spatially explicit outputs directly support evidence based targeting of conservation resources by Rwanda’s land and water management authorities.

Related

  1. Secondary ice production affects tropical convective clouds under different aerosol conditions
    Mengyu Sun, Paul J. Connolly, Paul R. Field +2
    Atmospheric Chemistry and PhysicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Atmospheric science & meteorologyCopernicusCrossref
  2. Fractal Roughness-Controlled Solute Transport and Apparent Local Retention in Sheared Rock Fractures Under Different Hydraulic Conditions
    Xiaotian Hao, Yuhang Tao, Kangsheng Xue
    Fractal and FractionalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Environmental science & pollutionCrossref
  3. Temporal variation in soil organic carbon stocks under different land-use and land-cover conditions in a semi-arid region
    Márcia Bruna Marim de Moura, Xuguang Tang, Klébia Raiane Siqueira de Souza +14
    Ecological IndicatorsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textHydrology & soilsDOAJ
  4. Comparison of machine learning and spatial interpolation methods for hourly rainfall data imputation in the Oliwski Stream catchment
    Ghunwa Shah, Wojciech Artichowicz, Tomasz Kolerski
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyCrossref
  5. The effects of climatic changes on plant physiological and catchment ecohydrological processes in the high-rainfall catchments of the Murray-Darling Basin: A scoping study
    Tim R. McVicar, Randall J. Donohue, Anthony P. O’Grady +1
    CSIROPeer-reviewedLicence not stated6 citedHydrology & soilsOpenAlex
BibTeX
@article{ntirenganya2026quantification,
  title = {{Quantification of soil loss by using RUSLE model under different land use and land cover conditions in AKANYARU catchment in Rwanda}},
  author = {Jean Bosco Ntirenganya and Eric Derrick Bugenimana and Rose Niyonkuru and Aphrodice Iragena and Pierre Celestin Uwamahoro and Tuyisabe Jean Bosco and Judith Uwihirwe},
  journal = {Discover Soil},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1007/s44378-026-00347-1},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00347-1},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Quantification of soil loss by using RUSLE model under different land use and land cover conditions in AKANYARU catchment in Rwanda
AU  - Jean Bosco Ntirenganya
AU  - Eric Derrick Bugenimana
AU  - Rose Niyonkuru
AU  - Aphrodice Iragena
AU  - Pierre Celestin Uwamahoro
AU  - Tuyisabe Jean Bosco
AU  - Judith Uwihirwe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/25
JO  - Discover Soil
DO  - 10.1007/s44378-026-00347-1
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-026-00347-1
AB  - This study quantified annual soil loss across the Akanyaru Catchment (3,402 km², Rwanda) under four land use and land cover types forest, agriculture, residential, and bare soil using the RUSLE model integrated with GIS. The Rainfall erosivity (R) is derived from 20 years of daily rainfall data obtained from the NASA database. The Soil erodibility (K) used is from global soil texture data; slope length and steepness (LS) from a 30 m DEM; and cover management (C) from Landsat 8 NDVI. The support practice factor (P) was set to 1.0, reflecting the absence of formal conservation structures in the catchment. The Soil loss range from 0 to 51.4391 t/ha/year. Near zero soil loss occurred under dense forest cover, while the highest rates were concentrated in bare and intensively farmed areas on steep slopes particularly in the northeastern and southwestern sub-catchments. The three RUSLE factors showing greatest spatial variationwere steep topography (LS: 0–1.678), degraded or absent vegetation cover (C: 0.0004–0.524), and high rainfall erosivity (R: 527.507–888.624 MJ·mm·ha⁻¹·h⁻¹·yr⁻¹). Findings call for prioritizing terracing and contour farming on steep agricultural slopes, expanding agroforestry and cover crops to reduce surface exposure, and improving soil organic matter in erodible sandy-silty soils. The spatially explicit outputs directly support evidence based targeting of conservation resources by Rwanda’s land and water management authorities.
SN  - 3005-1223
ER  -