Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 12 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYAstronomy & Astrophysics

Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?

4 affiliations
  1. 1Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  2. 2Physics Department, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
  3. 3Faculty of Physics, University of Duisburg-Essen
  4. 4INAF–Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri

Abstract

Context. The ionisation balance in molecular clouds is regulated by several ionising sources, including cosmic rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet radiation. Their relative importance depends on the local physical conditions and on the shielding column density. Aims. Our goal is to quantify the contribution of the large-scale diffuse X-ray radiation field to ionisation in molecular clouds in the absence of strong local X-ray sources, such as young stars, and to assess its significance relative to Galactic cosmic rays. Methods. We used measurements of diffuse X-ray emission from the first eROSITA all-sky survey to estimate the depth-dependent X-ray ionisation rate in molecular clouds across different Galactic environments. We considered both the observed diffuse field and a deabsorbed field obtained by correcting for foreground Galactic attenuation using HI4PI line-of-sight column densities in a pixel-by-pixel framework. Results. Diffuse Galactic X-rays are unlikely to dominate the ionisation balance in well-shielded molecular gas (NH > 5 × 1021cm−2), where cosmic rays remain the primary ionising agent. At low column densities, the deabsorbed diffuse X-ray field produces an ionisation rate of ζX ∼ 10−18s−1 at NH ∼ 1019cm−2, remaining below the lower end of the Galactic cosmic ray ionisation rate (∼10−17s−1). The X-ray contribution decreases rapidly with increasing shielding, falling to ζX ∼ 10−19s−1 by NH ∼ 1021cm−2 and to ζX ∼ 5 × 10−21s−1 by NH ∼ 1022cm−2. Diffuse X-ray may therefore contribute to the thermal and chemical structure of low-extinction material and should be considered when interpreting ionisation tracers in diffuse or cloud-envelope environments.

Related

  1. Carbon addition as the dominant pathway for aromatic growth in dense molecular clouds
    Jean-Christophe Loison, Ugo Jacovella
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  2. From short-lived to long-lived clouds: Impact of star formation models on giant molecular cloud evolution in simulations of an NGC 300-like galaxy
    Daniel Han, Taysun Kimm, Cheonsu Kang +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  3. Gas phase Elemental abundances in Molecular cloudS (GEMS). XII. First look into the para-to-ortho ratio of c-C_3D_2 towards pre-stellar cores
    J. Ferrer Asensio, A. Fuente, E. Roueff +3
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  4. Metal-poor molecular clouds in dwarf galaxies at parsec-scale resolution
    L. K. Hunt, M. Heyer, U. Lisenfeld +17
    Astronomy & AstrophysicsPeer-reviewedPublisher termsSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
  5. Examining Turbulence in Galactic Molecular Clouds. II. Turbulence Cascade Beyond the Scale of Giant Molecular Clouds
    Yuehui Ma, Miaomiao Zhang, Hongchi Wang +5
    The Astrophysical JournalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsCrossref
BibTeX
@article{e2026diffuse,
  title = {{Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?}},
  author = {Makarenko E. I. and Ivlev A. V. and Bialy S. and Zheng X. and Gaches B. A. L. and Caselli P. and Padovani M. and Yeung M. C. H.},
  journal = {Astronomy \& Astrophysics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1051/0004-6361/202662444},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202662444},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Can diffuse X-rays be important in driving photoionisation in molecular clouds?
AU  - Makarenko E. I.
AU  - Ivlev A. V.
AU  - Bialy S.
AU  - Zheng X.
AU  - Gaches B. A. L.
AU  - Caselli P.
AU  - Padovani M.
AU  - Yeung M. C. H.
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/27
JO  - Astronomy & Astrophysics
DO  - 10.1051/0004-6361/202662444
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202662444
AB  - Context. The ionisation balance in molecular clouds is regulated by several ionising sources, including cosmic rays, X-rays, and ultraviolet radiation. Their relative importance depends on the local physical conditions and on the shielding column density. Aims. Our goal is to quantify the contribution of the large-scale diffuse X-ray radiation field to ionisation in molecular clouds in the absence of strong local X-ray sources, such as young stars, and to assess its significance relative to Galactic cosmic rays. Methods. We used measurements of diffuse X-ray emission from the first eROSITA all-sky survey to estimate the depth-dependent X-ray ionisation rate in molecular clouds across different Galactic environments. We considered both the observed diffuse field and a deabsorbed field obtained by correcting for foreground Galactic attenuation using HI4PI line-of-sight column densities in a pixel-by-pixel framework. Results. Diffuse Galactic X-rays are unlikely to dominate the ionisation balance in well-shielded molecular gas (NH > 5 × 1021cm−2), where cosmic rays remain the primary ionising agent. At low column densities, the deabsorbed diffuse X-ray field produces an ionisation rate of ζX ∼ 10−18s−1 at NH ∼ 1019cm−2, remaining below the lower end of the Galactic cosmic ray ionisation rate (∼10−17s−1). The X-ray contribution decreases rapidly with increasing shielding, falling to ζX ∼ 10−19s−1 by NH ∼ 1021cm−2 and to ζX ∼ 5 × 10−21s−1 by NH ∼ 1022cm−2. Diffuse X-ray may therefore contribute to the thermal and chemical structure of low-extinction material and should be considered when interpreting ionisation tracers in diffuse or cloud-envelope environments.
SN  - 0004-6361
SN  - 1432-0746
ER  -