Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility
- 1Department of International Marketing and Retailing, University of Lodz, 90-131 Łódź, Poland
- 2Department of Preventive Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, 92-213 Lodz, Poland
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study compared the opinions of nutrition professionals from Poland, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany regarding the perceived importance and perceived use of policy instruments, audience characteristics affecting policy effectiveness, and credibility of nutrition information sources. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 131 nutrition professionals (56 Poland, 36 France, 26 UK, 13 Germany), who rated 14 policy instruments, 11 audience characteristics, and 9 information sources. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, ANCOVA, post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction, and analysis of open-ended responses. Results: Across policy instruments, perceived importance consistently exceeded perceived use, most strongly for nutrition education for children/adolescents (4.59 vs. 2.76, p < 0.001), information on product processing (3.92 vs. 2.44), dietitian recommendations (3.86 vs. 2.94), higher taxes on less healthy foods (3.46 vs. 2.50), and social marketing (3.60 vs. 3.19). After Benjamini–Hochberg correction, in ANCOVAs adjusted for age and professional experience, cross-national differences were observed in the assessment of credibility for health claims, nutrition claims, social marketing campaigns, cooking blogs, and nutrition apps. Qualitative findings emphasized the need for compulsory school-based nutrition education, better access to qualified professionals, and stricter regulation of food marketing and labelling. Conclusions: Nutrition professionals perceive a clear underutilization of key policy instruments, particularly educational and fiscal measures. Greater involvement of dietitians in context-sensitive policy design and implementation is recommended to bridge the gap between policy intentions and real-world effectiveness.
Related
- Pre-hospital care delays in trauma-related mass casualty incidents: a comparative international survey of high-income and low- and middle-income country perspectives
- Quality, Readability, and Content Deficiencies of Three Large Language Models in Bee Sting Health Information: A Comparative Evaluation with Patient Perspectives
- Diagnostic approach and management strategy for patients with exertional rhabdomyolysis - Results from an international survey of healthcare professionals.
- Exploring Medical Professionals’ Perspectives on Cannabinoid Use in Professional and Elite-Level Contact Sports: A Qualitative Inquiry
- Accessibility of essential medicines and vaccines among fisherfolk, artisanal miners and pastoralists in Mainland Tanzania: a qualitative study of barriers and strategies from the perspectives of healthcare professionals and community leaders.
BibTeX
@article{bryla2026perspectives,
title = {{Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility}},
author = {Paweł Bryła and Beata Ciabiada-Bryła},
journal = {Nutrients},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/nu18213493},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3493},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Perspectives of European Nutrition Professionals on Healthy Eating Policies: An International Comparative Study of Implementation Gaps and Information Credibility
AU - Paweł Bryła
AU - Beata Ciabiada-Bryła
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/24
JO - Nutrients
DO - 10.3390/nu18213493
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/18/21/3493
AB - Background/Objectives: This study compared the opinions of nutrition professionals from Poland, France, the United Kingdom, and Germany regarding the perceived importance and perceived use of policy instruments, audience characteristics affecting policy effectiveness, and credibility of nutrition information sources. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was completed by 131 nutrition professionals (56 Poland, 36 France, 26 UK, 13 Germany), who rated 14 policy instruments, 11 audience characteristics, and 9 information sources. Data were analyzed using ANOVA, ANCOVA, post-hoc tests with Bonferroni correction, and analysis of open-ended responses. Results: Across policy instruments, perceived importance consistently exceeded perceived use, most strongly for nutrition education for children/adolescents (4.59 vs. 2.76, p < 0.001), information on product processing (3.92 vs. 2.44), dietitian recommendations (3.86 vs. 2.94), higher taxes on less healthy foods (3.46 vs. 2.50), and social marketing (3.60 vs. 3.19). After Benjamini–Hochberg correction, in ANCOVAs adjusted for age and professional experience, cross-national differences were observed in the assessment of credibility for health claims, nutrition claims, social marketing campaigns, cooking blogs, and nutrition apps. Qualitative findings emphasized the need for compulsory school-based nutrition education, better access to qualified professionals, and stricter regulation of food marketing and labelling. Conclusions: Nutrition professionals perceive a clear underutilization of key policy instruments, particularly educational and fiscal measures. Greater involvement of dietitians in context-sensitive policy design and implementation is recommended to bridge the gap between policy intentions and real-world effectiveness.
SN - 2072-6643
ER -