The complete defensive strategy: Defining complementary pitching and fielder positioning strategies in baseball
- 1Department of Computer Science, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, United States of America
Abstract
In baseball, the characteristics of a pitch have an effect on a batted ball’s trajectory. For example, batters are more likely to hit a fastball to the opposite side of the field and to pull a changeup. In this paper, we present novel matchup and pitch-specific approaches to positioning fielders to maximize outs and minimize runs allowed against opposing hitters. Unfortunately, the pitch-specific approach may reveal information about the upcoming pitch to the opposing batter. Thus, we combine our pitch-specific positioning strategy with an existing pitch selection game theory model that assumes the batter can observe the pitch up to a decision point, at which point they must decide whether to swing at or take the pitch. The combined pitching and positioning strategies, which we call the complete defensive strategy, complement each other by mixing in an occasional bluff where the pitcher throws the wrong pitch for the positioning strategy. Thus, the batter cannot use the positioning strategy to perfectly predict the upcoming pitch, and the defense is able to utilize the pitch-specific positioning strategy. We show that the matchup and pitch-specific approaches to positioning are not significantly more effective at preventing hits or runs than a previously defined batter-specific approach. Thus, although a baseball team could use our methodology to define pitch-specific positioning strategies that do not tip the pitch to the batter, they could define similarly effective positioning strategies using much simpler models that only consider the batter’s tendencies.
Related
- Contrasting defensive strategies underlie differential susceptibility of corals to crown-of-thorns sea star (CoTS; Acanthaster cf. solaris ) predation
- Toward welfare indicators: leg condition and aversive stimuli modulate defensive behavior in Opilones
- Emodin induces defensive autophagy against white spot syndrome virus infection via targeting the hemocyanin-mediated endoplasmic reticulum-mitochondrial crosstalk in shrimp
- Threat imminence and estimates of agency dictate proactive and reactive defensive behaviors in active place avoidance
- Lepidopteran Caterpillars in Ambers from Lebanon, Myanmar, Mexico, and the Dominican Republic Indicate Diversification of Defensive Structures and Increasing Abundance over Time
BibTeX
@article{melville2026complete,
title = {{The complete defensive strategy: Defining complementary pitching and fielder positioning strategies in baseball}},
author = {William Melville and Christopher Archibald and David Grimsman},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0341045},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341045},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - The complete defensive strategy: Defining complementary pitching and fielder positioning strategies in baseball
AU - William Melville
AU - Christopher Archibald
AU - David Grimsman
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/07
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0341045
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341045
AB - In baseball, the characteristics of a pitch have an effect on a batted ball’s trajectory. For example, batters are more likely to hit a fastball to the opposite side of the field and to pull a changeup. In this paper, we present novel matchup and pitch-specific approaches to positioning fielders to maximize outs and minimize runs allowed against opposing hitters. Unfortunately, the pitch-specific approach may reveal information about the upcoming pitch to the opposing batter. Thus, we combine our pitch-specific positioning strategy with an existing pitch selection game theory model that assumes the batter can observe the pitch up to a decision point, at which point they must decide whether to swing at or take the pitch. The combined pitching and positioning strategies, which we call the complete defensive strategy, complement each other by mixing in an occasional bluff where the pitcher throws the wrong pitch for the positioning strategy. Thus, the batter cannot use the positioning strategy to perfectly predict the upcoming pitch, and the defense is able to utilize the pitch-specific positioning strategy. We show that the matchup and pitch-specific approaches to positioning are not significantly more effective at preventing hits or runs than a previously defined batter-specific approach. Thus, although a baseball team could use our methodology to define pitch-specific positioning strategies that do not tip the pitch to the batter, they could define similarly effective positioning strategies using much simpler models that only consider the batter’s tendencies.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -