Biases and predictability limits of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones in subseasonal prediction systems
6 affiliations
- 1Beijing Normal University Faculty of Geographical Science
- 2Beijing Normal University
- 3The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
- 4Chinese Acad Sci
- 5National Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration
- 6Met Office
Abstract
Subseasonal prediction of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones (ETCs) is critical for anticipating associated weather extremes, yet biases and predictability limits of ETC activity in current forecast systems remain insufficiently quantified. Here, using hindcasts from ten state-of-the-art subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) prediction systems within a Lagrangian tracking framework, we uncover a common and pervasive bias: the multi-model ensemble consistently predicts fewer and weaker cyclones at a one-month lead, underestimating frequency by 10-18% and intensity by approximately 13%, with more pronounced frequency deficits exceeding 26% specifically for winter bomb cyclones. These biases are dynamically driven by misrepresented meridional temperature gradients, which contribute to weaker and meridionally displaced upper-tropospheric jets and reduced peak baroclinic instability, thereby suppressing ETC formation and intensification. We further reveal that regional ETC frequency prediction skill during their respective peak seasons is limited to approximately 9–18 days, with substantial regional contrasts: the longest predictability horizon extends over the North Pacific, whereas the horizon is shortest over the North Atlantic. These regional differences are associated with variations in the dominant large-scale atmospheric drivers and their predictability over different regions. These findings establish an event-based benchmark for evaluating subseasonal ETC predictions and underscore key forecast bottlenecks in current S2S systems. Improving the representation of large-scale baroclinic environments and further unravelling the interactions between regional ETC activity and predictability sources will be essential for advancing reliable subseasonal predictions of ETC-related hazards.
Related
- Distinct intraseasonal pathways driving rapidly escalating heat extremes in North China and their subseasonal predictability
- Warming since the Last Glacial Maximum amplifies Northern Hemisphere drought expansion driven by the Pacific Decadal Oscillation
- Widespread acceleration of drought propagation from meteorological to ecological systems in the northern hemisphere under climate warming
- Evidence for Hunga-Tonga eruption influence on the anomalously strong Northern-Hemisphere stratospheric polar vortex in 2024/2025
- An assessment of Northern Hemisphere warm spell trends across seasons: spring warm spells increasing faster than projected
BibTeX
@article{li2026biases,
title = {{Biases and predictability limits of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones in subseasonal prediction systems}},
author = {Shentong Li and Jing Yang and Anling Liu and Mengqian Lu and Qing Bao and Jie Wu and Stacey New},
journal = {Environmental Research Letters},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.1088/1748-9326/aebbd7},
url = {https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbd7},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Biases and predictability limits of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones in subseasonal prediction systems
AU - Shentong Li
AU - Jing Yang
AU - Anling Liu
AU - Mengqian Lu
AU - Qing Bao
AU - Jie Wu
AU - Stacey New
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Environmental Research Letters
DO - 10.1088/1748-9326/aebbd7
UR - https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aebbd7
AB - Subseasonal prediction of Northern Hemisphere extratropical cyclones (ETCs) is critical for anticipating associated weather extremes, yet biases and predictability limits of ETC activity in current forecast systems remain insufficiently quantified. Here, using hindcasts from ten state-of-the-art subseasonal-to-seasonal (S2S) prediction systems within a Lagrangian tracking framework, we uncover a common and pervasive bias: the multi-model ensemble consistently predicts fewer and weaker cyclones at a one-month lead, underestimating frequency by 10-18% and intensity by approximately 13%, with more pronounced frequency deficits exceeding 26% specifically for winter bomb cyclones. These biases are dynamically driven by misrepresented meridional temperature gradients, which contribute to weaker and meridionally displaced upper-tropospheric jets and reduced peak baroclinic instability, thereby suppressing ETC formation and intensification. We further reveal that regional ETC frequency prediction skill during their respective peak seasons is limited to approximately 9–18 days, with substantial regional contrasts: the longest predictability horizon extends over the North Pacific, whereas the horizon is shortest over the North Atlantic. These regional differences are associated with variations in the dominant large-scale atmospheric drivers and their predictability over different regions. These findings establish an event-based benchmark for evaluating subseasonal ETC predictions and underscore key forecast bottlenecks in current S2S systems. Improving the representation of large-scale baroclinic environments and further unravelling the interactions between regional ETC activity and predictability sources will be essential for advancing reliable subseasonal predictions of ETC-related hazards.
SN - 1748-9326
ER -