Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,683 studies31 sourcesUpdated 42 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

On State Distinguishing Without Inverse Queries

Abstract

In the quantum state distinguishing problem, an algorithm is given copies of a state |ψ⟩ or |ϕ⟩ separated by trace distance ε, and tasked with deciding which is the case. It is a standard result that Θ(ε−2) copies are required, while having access to a unitary state preparation oracle and its inverse improves this to Θ(ε−1) queries. We study the intermediate case with forward-only access, capturing scenarios where the oracle is a physical process that cannot be reversed. Tang and Wright recently showed that distinguishing a known state from an \emph{unknown} close state requires Ω(ε−2) forward queries in high dimension; we strengthen this result by proving the same bound even when both states are known, as in the state distinguishing setting. Moreover, our lower bound uses a direct hybrid argument, avoiding advanced compressed oracle techniques used in the prior work. In contrast, we give a dimension-independent algorithm solving a continuous-time variant of state distinguishing with only O(ε−1) total forward evolution time. The algorithm uses quantum Zeno dynamics to confine evolution to a known two-dimensional subspace. Thus, a quadratic advantage survives without inverse access for a natural continuous-time analogue of state distinguishing.

Related

  1. Optimal Quantum Junta Testing without Inverse Queries
    Jinge Bao, Minbo Gao, Penghui Yao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. SHRAV: State-Hypothesis-Reason-Action-Verify Framework for Physical Modeling and Inverse Design
    Ziheng Guo, Yang Bu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textComputational physicsOptics & photonicsarXiv
  3. Differentiable Inverse Design of Two-Body Interactions for the Moore-Read State
    Yi Yang, Xin Wan, Zi-Xiang Hu
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterarXiv
  4. Entanglement without the Entangled State: A Local Theory of Qubits with an Extended Born Rule
    Sermet Yücel
    HALPreprintPublisher termsFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  5. Dark state as a measurable state by a dispersive readout without a Purcell limit
    Wei-Chen Chien, Jyh-Yang Wang, Yen-Yu Chiang +6
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026state,
  title = {{On State Distinguishing Without Inverse Queries}},
  author = {Emma Wang and Joseph Carolan and Andrew M. Childs},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.05389},
  eprint = {2610.05389},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05389},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - On State Distinguishing Without Inverse Queries
AU  - Emma Wang
AU  - Joseph Carolan
AU  - Andrew M. Childs
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/04
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.05389
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.05389
AB  - In the quantum state distinguishing problem, an algorithm is given copies of a state |ψ⟩ or |ϕ⟩ separated by trace distance ε, and tasked with deciding which is the case. It is a standard result that Θ(ε^−2) copies are required, while having access to a unitary state preparation oracle and its inverse improves this to Θ(ε^−1) queries. We study the intermediate case with forward-only access, capturing scenarios where the oracle is a physical process that cannot be reversed. Tang and Wright recently showed that distinguishing a known state from an \emph{unknown} close state requires Ω(ε^−2) forward queries in high dimension; we strengthen this result by proving the same bound even when both states are known, as in the state distinguishing setting. Moreover, our lower bound uses a direct hybrid argument, avoiding advanced compressed oracle techniques used in the prior work. In contrast, we give a dimension-independent algorithm solving a continuous-time variant of state distinguishing with only O(ε^−1) total forward evolution time. The algorithm uses quantum Zeno dynamics to confine evolution to a known two-dimensional subspace. Thus, a quadratic advantage survives without inverse access for a natural continuous-time analogue of state distinguishing.
ER  -