Effect of Polymer Matrix Type and Particle-Size Distribution on the Mechanical, Microstructural, and Thermal Behavior of Waste Tire Rubber Composites
- 1Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bingöl University, 12000 Bingöl, Türkiye
Abstract
Recycling ground tire rubber (GTR) into polymer-matrix composites requires accounting for both matrix formulation and rubber particle-size distribution. Here, polyurethane, epoxy, novolac–hexamine, and unsaturated polyester systems were compared using four gradations of the same rubber source (16 formulations). A common main-resin-to-rubber mass ratio of 20% was used; differences in required auxiliary components and curing conditions were explicitly considered. The 28-day reference compression results ranged from 1.22 to 1.35 MPa for the polyester formulations to 8.21 MPa for epoxy–K1; epoxy–K1 also reached 2.21 MPa in flexure, whereas polyurethane–K4 reached 6.29 MPa in compression and 1.94 MPa in flexure. Thirteen available compression curves were reprocessed using the 70 × 50 mm loaded face and 70 mm loading length; derived deformation and work-density parameters are apparent, machine-displacement-based measures. Binder-specific UPV trends were exploratory (four gradations per binder). Selected SEM/EDS, ATR-FTIR, and representative TGA/DTG data supplied complementary evidence without establishing interfacial chemical bonding, cure inhibition, or fire performance. The results indicate formulation-dependent strength–deformation trade-offs within the tested materials rather than a universal optimum matrix or gradation.
Related
- Comparative study of chemical treatments on the mechanical and moisture absorption behavior of coccinia indica fiber-reinforced epoxy composites
- From Reinforcement to Prediction: Mechanical Behavior and Modeling of CNT-Reinforced Cementitious Composites
- Processing of PVDF/Nb5+ and Sr2+-Doped PZT Composites for Applications in Advanced Dielectric Insulation: Effect of Ceramic Loading on Structure, Mechanical Properties, Electrical Properties, and Thermal Aging Behavior
- Investigation of crack initiation, and mechanical behavior of polypropylene and polymer-based composites under plastic deformation in automotive brake fluid reservoirs
- Enhanced thermal conductivity of polyurethane composites via microstructural design of 3D interconnected boron nitride networks
BibTeX
@article{mohabbi2026effect,
title = {{Effect of Polymer Matrix Type and Particle-Size Distribution on the Mechanical, Microstructural, and Thermal Behavior of Waste Tire Rubber Composites}},
author = {Mehrzad Mohabbi and Canan Kaya Sahin},
journal = {Polymers},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.3390/polym18202599},
url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2599},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Effect of Polymer Matrix Type and Particle-Size Distribution on the Mechanical, Microstructural, and Thermal Behavior of Waste Tire Rubber Composites
AU - Mehrzad Mohabbi
AU - Canan Kaya Sahin
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/21
JO - Polymers
DO - 10.3390/polym18202599
UR - https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/18/20/2599
AB - Recycling ground tire rubber (GTR) into polymer-matrix composites requires accounting for both matrix formulation and rubber particle-size distribution. Here, polyurethane, epoxy, novolac–hexamine, and unsaturated polyester systems were compared using four gradations of the same rubber source (16 formulations). A common main-resin-to-rubber mass ratio of 20% was used; differences in required auxiliary components and curing conditions were explicitly considered. The 28-day reference compression results ranged from 1.22 to 1.35 MPa for the polyester formulations to 8.21 MPa for epoxy–K1; epoxy–K1 also reached 2.21 MPa in flexure, whereas polyurethane–K4 reached 6.29 MPa in compression and 1.94 MPa in flexure. Thirteen available compression curves were reprocessed using the 70 × 50 mm loaded face and 70 mm loading length; derived deformation and work-density parameters are apparent, machine-displacement-based measures. Binder-specific UPV trends were exploratory (four gradations per binder). Selected SEM/EDS, ATR-FTIR, and representative TGA/DTG data supplied complementary evidence without establishing interfacial chemical bonding, cure inhibition, or fire performance. The results indicate formulation-dependent strength–deformation trade-offs within the tested materials rather than a universal optimum matrix or gradation.
SN - 2073-4360
ER -