Anchored multiple testing: a transparent use of e-closure to improve FDR procedures
Abstract
The recent e-closure method can recover every procedure that controls FDR (and other expectation losses). But the recovered e-collection is ``self-referential'' and gives no insight on how to improve the procedure (if improvable), and some recent improvements have been somewhat opaque. We introduce an elementary new technique called anchoring that exploits looseness in existing FDR proofs to enlarge a baseline multiple-testing procedure's self-referential local e-value. The resulting e-closure thus transparently retains every baseline discovery (and usually adding more) and controlling the false discovery rate under the same conditions as the baseline. To show that this principle is broadly applicable, we use it to improve a large suite of multiple testing procedures: (i) Anchored-BH dominates the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure under PRDS while being incomparable to Goeman's recent closed-BH, (ii) Anchored-BY dominates the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure under arbitrary dependence while being incomparable to closed-BY, (iii) For two-sided Gaussian p-values (under appropriate covariance conditions), Anchored-2BH dominates running BH twice at half the level on two one-sided p-values, (iv) Anchored-dBH dominates dependence-adjusted BH, (v) Anchored e-BH dominates e-BH and is incomparable to closed e-BH, (vi) Anchored SeqStep+ improves the original (including selective and adpative variants) while preserving ordered rejection structures. All of these are accomplished in sorting or quadratic time. The appendix shows how to dominate Shifted-BH (for two-sided arbitrarily correlated Gaussians) and NDBH (for negatively dependent p-values), IndBH (for graph-dependent p-values), conformal multiple testing and the support line procedure for boundary FDR control.
Related
- Gain-function optimisation of graphical multiple testing procedures for confirmatory clinical trials
- Uniformly Improved Adaptive Filtering Procedures for Replicability Testing with FWER Control
- Testing Procedures for Strict Pleiotropy in Genetic Association Studies
- A Model of Multiple Hypothesis Testing
- Sample-Efficient Multiple Testing with Adaptive Data Collection
BibTeX
@misc{ramdas2026anchored,
title = {{Anchored multiple testing: a transparent use of e-closure to improve FDR procedures}},
author = {Aaditya Ramdas},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.11279},
eprint = {2610.11279},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11279},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Anchored multiple testing: a transparent use of e-closure to improve FDR procedures
AU - Aaditya Ramdas
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.11279
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.11279
AB - The recent e-closure method can recover every procedure that controls FDR (and other expectation losses). But the recovered e-collection is ``self-referential'' and gives no insight on how to improve the procedure (if improvable), and some recent improvements have been somewhat opaque. We introduce an elementary new technique called anchoring that exploits looseness in existing FDR proofs to enlarge a baseline multiple-testing procedure's self-referential local e-value. The resulting e-closure thus transparently retains every baseline discovery (and usually adding more) and controlling the false discovery rate under the same conditions as the baseline. To show that this principle is broadly applicable, we use it to improve a large suite of multiple testing procedures: (i) Anchored-BH dominates the Benjamini-Hochberg (BH) procedure under PRDS while being incomparable to Goeman's recent closed-BH, (ii) Anchored-BY dominates the Benjamini-Yekutieli (BY) procedure under arbitrary dependence while being incomparable to closed-BY, (iii) For two-sided Gaussian p-values (under appropriate covariance conditions), Anchored-2BH dominates running BH twice at half the level on two one-sided p-values, (iv) Anchored-dBH dominates dependence-adjusted BH, (v) Anchored e-BH dominates e-BH and is incomparable to closed e-BH, (vi) Anchored SeqStep+ improves the original (including selective and adpative variants) while preserving ordered rejection structures. All of these are accomplished in sorting or quadratic time. The appendix shows how to dominate Shifted-BH (for two-sided arbitrarily correlated Gaussians) and NDBH (for negatively dependent p-values), IndBH (for graph-dependent p-values), conformal multiple testing and the support line procedure for boundary FDR control.
ER -