Real-world activities of clinician-researchers in perioperative medicine: an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in a single-centre clinical trial
Abstract
Background Clinician-researchers play a key role in bridging clinical care and research, yet their day-to-day activities remain poorly described. This study aimed to characterise the range of activities undertaken by clinician-researchers in a perioperative clinical trial and explore how these activities are experienced by patient-participants. Methods We conducted an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in an RCT in a tertiary hospital. In phase 1, clinician-researchers (physicians and nurses) were observed in situ over 10 days using shadowing and time-motion analysis to document their activities. In phase 2, we conducted interviews with patient-participants. Data were analysed using an abductive approach informed by activity theory. Results The study was conducted between October and November 2021 and included observation of seven clinician-researchers and eight patient-participants. Clinician-researchers engaged in a variety of activities extending past traditional research tasks. Time spent on supportive tasks was nearly three times as much as that spent on core RCT activities, with many tasks occurring before or after primary research procedures. Non-RCT activities accounted for one-third of observed time. Patient-participants reported that interactions with clinician-researchers contributed to their perioperative experience, particularly through (1) alleviation of boredom and (2) provision of a perceived sense of safety. Conclusions Clinician-researchers undertook a wide range of activities that extended beyond protocol-driven research tasks encompassing significant coordination and relational work. These activities were perceived by patient-participants to positively influence their perioperative experience in this specific context. These findings highlight the importance of considering the full scope of clinician-researchers’ work when designing and implementing prospective clinical trials.
Related
- Patients as Co‐Researchers in Oncology: A Qualitative Exploration of Participatory Governance
- LC-HRMS/MS-based qualitative secondary metabolites profiling of Leptadenia arborea and evaluation of its antioxidant and hemostatic activities
- Epilogue to the thematic issue Anthropozoology of the red deer. Archaeological, historical, and ethnographic evidence
- Fine-scale human–flood relationships in the Congo Basin: ethnographic perspectives from the Lac Télé Community Reserve
- The precarious nature of musical encounters in healthcare: An ethnographic multi-case study focusing on the perspectives of care professionals and musicians
BibTeX
@article{acero2026realworld,
title = {{Real-world activities of clinician-researchers in perioperative medicine: an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in a single-centre clinical trial}},
author = {Maria-Ximena Acero and Mathias Waelli and Mia Gisselbaek and Bernardo Bollen Pinto},
journal = {British Journal of Anaesthesia open},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100862},
url = {https://hal.science/hal-05754292v1},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Real-world activities of clinician-researchers in perioperative medicine: an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in a single-centre clinical trial
AU - Maria-Ximena Acero
AU - Mathias Waelli
AU - Mia Gisselbaek
AU - Bernardo Bollen Pinto
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/15
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia open
DO - 10.1016/j.bjao.2026.100862
UR - https://hal.science/hal-05754292v1
AB - Background Clinician-researchers play a key role in bridging clinical care and research, yet their day-to-day activities remain poorly described. This study aimed to characterise the range of activities undertaken by clinician-researchers in a perioperative clinical trial and explore how these activities are experienced by patient-participants. Methods We conducted an ethnographic qualitative case study embedded in an RCT in a tertiary hospital. In phase 1, clinician-researchers (physicians and nurses) were observed in situ over 10 days using shadowing and time-motion analysis to document their activities. In phase 2, we conducted interviews with patient-participants. Data were analysed using an abductive approach informed by activity theory. Results The study was conducted between October and November 2021 and included observation of seven clinician-researchers and eight patient-participants. Clinician-researchers engaged in a variety of activities extending past traditional research tasks. Time spent on supportive tasks was nearly three times as much as that spent on core RCT activities, with many tasks occurring before or after primary research procedures. Non-RCT activities accounted for one-third of observed time. Patient-participants reported that interactions with clinician-researchers contributed to their perioperative experience, particularly through (1) alleviation of boredom and (2) provision of a perceived sense of safety. Conclusions Clinician-researchers undertook a wide range of activities that extended beyond protocol-driven research tasks encompassing significant coordination and relational work. These activities were perceived by patient-participants to positively influence their perioperative experience in this specific context. These findings highlight the importance of considering the full scope of clinician-researchers’ work when designing and implementing prospective clinical trials.
SN - 2772-6096
ER -