Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,230 studies31 sourcesUpdated 10 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

From Sea Surface Height to Velocity - A Machine Learning Approach

Abstract

Inferring upper-ocean velocity from altimetric sea surface height (SSH) remains challenging below 50~km, scales now resolved by the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission. Conventional methods rely on geostrophic or cyclogeostrophic balance. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning can predict the full velocity vector from SSH and environmental data and recover derivative-based diagnostics, including spectral energy flux. We trained a U-Net encoder--decoder on hourly fields from the pre-SWOT Cape Basin extraction of the LLC4320 ocean simulation, with 1.5-km grid spacing ($11.8−−15.8^\circ$E, $41−−45^\circ$S). Inputs were SSH, sea surface temperature (SST), and wind stress; targets were horizontal velocities at the surface and 50~m, where wind influence is weaker. At 50~m, the best model achieves a speed RMSE of 0.049 m s−1, 29% lower than the geostrophic approximation. Predicted relative vorticity has a correlation of 0.93, compared with 0.75 for the geostrophic approximation. The model also recovers divergence with a correlation of 0.66, whereas geostrophic velocity is nondivergent by definition. Tests of training strategies yield four findings: SSH gradients outperform raw SSH as inputs; wind stress is the most useful covariate for total velocity prediction; SST benefits vary seasonally; and including vorticity and divergence in the loss improves accuracy. These results offer a path for transferring high-fidelity simulation physics to SWOT applications, where kilometer-scale SSH snapshots contain superposed balanced and unbalanced signals.

Related

  1. Coupled Analytical Model for the Internal Boundary Layer Height, Wall Shear Stress and Mean Velocity Behind a Surface Roughness Transition in Boundary-Layer Flow
    Kingshuk Mondal, Niranjan S. Ghaisas
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyFluid dynamicsarXiv
  2. Deep Learning Denoising of Real SWOT Sea Surface Height Observations
    Gaétan Meis, Anaëlle Tréboutte, Maxime Ballarotta +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAtmospheric science & meteorologyarXiv
  3. The Equilibrium Response of Atmospheric Machine‐Learning Models to Uniform Sea Surface Temperature Warming
    Bosong Zhang, Timothy M. Merlis
    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text11 citedClimate scienceOpenAlex
  4. Deciphering the impacts of meteorology on surface ozone variability in eastern China using explainable machine learning models
    Xingpei Ye, Lin Zhang, Xiaolin Wang +4
    Atmospheric chemistry and physicsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull text9 citedAtmospheric science & meteorologyOpenAlex
  5. Assessing Dynamical Contributions to SWOT Sea Surface Height in an Internal Tide Hotspot
    Arne Bendinger, Clement Vic, Michel Tchilibou +2
    Geophysical Research LettersPeer-reviewedCC BY1 citedOceanography & cryosphereHAL
BibTeX
@misc{yaradoddi2026from,
  title = {{From Sea Surface Height to Velocity - A Machine Learning Approach}},
  author = {Yaswanth Reddy Yaradoddi and Jinbo Wang and Elyes Serghine},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04270},
  eprint = {2611.04270},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04270},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - From Sea Surface Height to Velocity - A Machine Learning Approach
AU  - Yaswanth Reddy Yaradoddi
AU  - Jinbo Wang
AU  - Elyes Serghine
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04270
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04270
AB  - Inferring upper-ocean velocity from altimetric sea surface height (SSH) remains challenging below 50~km, scales now resolved by the Surface Water and Ocean Topography (SWOT) mission. Conventional methods rely on geostrophic or cyclogeostrophic balance. Here, we demonstrate that deep learning can predict the full velocity vector from SSH and environmental data and recover derivative-based diagnostics, including spectral energy flux. We trained a U-Net encoder--decoder on hourly fields from the pre-SWOT Cape Basin extraction of the LLC4320 ocean simulation, with 1.5-km grid spacing ($11.8−−15.8^\circ$E, $41−−45^\circ$S). Inputs were SSH, sea surface temperature (SST), and wind stress; targets were horizontal velocities at the surface and 50~m, where wind influence is weaker. At 50~m, the best model achieves a speed RMSE of 0.049 m s^−1, 29% lower than the geostrophic approximation. Predicted relative vorticity has a correlation of 0.93, compared with 0.75 for the geostrophic approximation. The model also recovers divergence with a correlation of 0.66, whereas geostrophic velocity is nondivergent by definition. Tests of training strategies yield four findings: SSH gradients outperform raw SSH as inputs; wind stress is the most useful covariate for total velocity prediction; SST benefits vary seasonally; and including vorticity and divergence in the loss improves accuracy. These results offer a path for transferring high-fidelity simulation physics to SWOT applications, where kilometer-scale SSH snapshots contain superposed balanced and unbalanced signals.
ER  -