Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Low peak expiratory flow and subsequent first self-report of recognized lung disease: Person-disjoint replication and spirometric benchmarking in HRS and ELSA

  1. 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, Sichuan, China
  2. 2Institute of Surgery, Graduate School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China

Abstract

Background: Low peak expiratory flow (PEF) may precede the first self-report of recognized lung disease, but cross-cohort consistency and incremental value are uncertain. Methods: We analysed Health and Retirement Study (HRS) discovery and prespecified person-disjoint replication samples and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The estimand linked baseline PEF to the first subsequently observed self-report of recognized lung disease, not biological onset. HRS used a prespecified nominal lower-decile z score and ELSA an empirical lower decile. Participant-clustered models adjusted for demographic, clinical and functional factors. Weighting and a stroke comparator were sensitivity analyses. Post-hoc ELSA benchmarking compared PEF with FEV1 and FVC using person-disjoint cross-validation and full-pipeline bootstrap sensitivity. Results: Models included 18,510 HRS discovery windows (320 reports), 11,424 replication windows (188), and 8,634 ELSA person-waves (95). Low PEF was associated with first report in discovery (odds ratio [OR] 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.54–4.45), replication (3.14, 2.19–4.49), and ELSA (3.77, 2.36–6.01). Weighted estimates were similar; stroke associations were weaker or null. After adjustment for separate FEV1 and FVC indices, the continuous-PEF OR was 1.04 (0.90–1.20). In 1,584 fixed-horizon participants (95 events), AUCs were 0.650 for covariates, 0.684 with PEF, 0.745 with FEV1 and FVC, and 0.739 with all three. Full-pipeline bootstrap sensitivity found no clear incremental evidence beyond FEV1 and FVC. Across differing horizons, low-PEF rules identified fewer than one-third of reports in HRS replication and ELSA. Conclusions: Lower PEF was associated with a subsequent first observed lung-disease report; cohort-specific low-PEF rules identified fewer than one-third. In exploratory fixed out-of-fold predictions, PEF improved average precision and prediction error over covariates; no clear incremental evidence remained after FEV1 and FVC. Same-protocol collection does not establish a peak-flow-only pathway.

Related

  1. Transitions Among Four Spirometric States and Subsequent Pre-Bronchodilator Airflow Obstruction: A Community Cohort Study.
    Dongyu He, Jiaxuan Wu, Junyi Ke +3
    International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Quantitative CT features for COPD classification and GOLD spirometric severity assessment: a single-center model-development study
    Kaifeng Du, Jiameng Gao, Ji Li +5
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Effect of intraoperative high positive end-expiratory pressure with recruitment manoeuvres versus low positive end-expiratory pressure on postoperative lung function in obese adults: a substudy of the protective ventilation in obese patients randomised controlled trial
    Damien Rousseleau, Thomas Bluth, Bas Bruneel +5
    BJA openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Right-left discordance of pulmonary artery wedge pressure under high positive end-expiratory pressure in acute eccentric mitral regurgitation
    European heart journal. Case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textCardiovascular medicineEurope PMC
  5. Baseline peak expiratory flow and incident hip fracture in older Chinese adults : A prospective CHARLS cohort study
    Wei Chen, Zongfeng Chen, Yan Wang +3
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{hu2026peak,
  title = {{Low peak expiratory flow and subsequent first self-report of recognized lung disease: Person-disjoint replication and spirometric benchmarking in HRS and ELSA}},
  author = {Haiyang Hu and Chun Wang and Jiang Fu and Haining Zhou},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0360668},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360668},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Low peak expiratory flow and subsequent first self-report of recognized lung disease: Person-disjoint replication and spirometric benchmarking in HRS and ELSA
AU  - Haiyang Hu
AU  - Chun Wang
AU  - Jiang Fu
AU  - Haining Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/12
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0360668
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360668
AB  - Background: Low peak expiratory flow (PEF) may precede the first self-report of recognized lung disease, but cross-cohort consistency and incremental value are uncertain. Methods: We analysed Health and Retirement Study (HRS) discovery and prespecified person-disjoint replication samples and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). The estimand linked baseline PEF to the first subsequently observed self-report of recognized lung disease, not biological onset. HRS used a prespecified nominal lower-decile z score and ELSA an empirical lower decile. Participant-clustered models adjusted for demographic, clinical and functional factors. Weighting and a stroke comparator were sensitivity analyses. Post-hoc ELSA benchmarking compared PEF with FEV1 and FVC using person-disjoint cross-validation and full-pipeline bootstrap sensitivity. Results: Models included 18,510 HRS discovery windows (320 reports), 11,424 replication windows (188), and 8,634 ELSA person-waves (95). Low PEF was associated with first report in discovery (odds ratio [OR] 3.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.54–4.45), replication (3.14, 2.19–4.49), and ELSA (3.77, 2.36–6.01). Weighted estimates were similar; stroke associations were weaker or null. After adjustment for separate FEV1 and FVC indices, the continuous-PEF OR was 1.04 (0.90–1.20). In 1,584 fixed-horizon participants (95 events), AUCs were 0.650 for covariates, 0.684 with PEF, 0.745 with FEV1 and FVC, and 0.739 with all three. Full-pipeline bootstrap sensitivity found no clear incremental evidence beyond FEV1 and FVC. Across differing horizons, low-PEF rules identified fewer than one-third of reports in HRS replication and ELSA. Conclusions: Lower PEF was associated with a subsequent first observed lung-disease report; cohort-specific low-PEF rules identified fewer than one-third. In exploratory fixed out-of-fold predictions, PEF improved average precision and prediction error over covariates; no clear incremental evidence remained after FEV1 and FVC. Same-protocol collection does not establish a peak-flow-only pathway.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -