Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 32 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

A Sphericity Filter for Space-Filling Designs in Nondeterministic Experiments

Abstract

Space-filling designs support flexible modeling in noisy multi-response experiments, but an individual design can give poor precision for low-order effects. We use a low-order working model to identify effects whose estimation precision we seek to protect, while allowing a more complex final response model. The filter selects one complete design from a candidate pool by minimizing a geometric loss divided by sphericity, without exchanging or altering its points. Sphericity measures the balance of the working-model confidence ellipsoid's principal-axis variances, independently of its volume. In a working-model basis orthonormal over the prediction region, sphericity is the shape factor of the I-criterion, which measures average prediction variance. In cube studies with quadratic least-squares and Gaussian-process fits, this target filter gives modest average prediction gains over the geometrically best candidate at small geometric cost. Gains in working-model precision are largest near saturation: in a four-factor example, worst-decile prediction standard error falls by about a quarter relative to the geometrically best candidate. In constrained mixtures, raw coefficient-based filtering and A-optimality can emphasize extrapolated Scheffe coefficients and yield poor regional prediction precision. Target filtering improves regional working-model precision in most settings studied, mirroring the advantage of I- over A-optimality for highly constrained mixture designs.

Related

  1. Space-Filling One-Factor-At-A-Time Designs
    Wei-Yang Yu, V. Roshan Joseph
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  2. A Tutorial on Safe Anytime-Valid Inference: Practical Maximally Flexible Sampling Designs for Experiments Based on e-Values
    Alexander Ly, Udo Boehm, Peter Grünwald +2
    PsyArXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsOSF
  3. A note on the nondeterministic communication complexity of equality
    Mathieu Hoyrup
    HALPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCombinatorics & discrete mathematicsHAL
  4. A Criterion for the Sphericity of a CR Manifold
    M. A. Stepanova
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsarXiv
  5. CAT(0) spaces without linear filling at the asymptotic rank
    Stephan Stadler
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{karl2026sphericity,
  title = {{A Sphericity Filter for Space-Filling Designs in Nondeterministic Experiments}},
  author = {Andrew T. Karl},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.36012},
  eprint = {2610.36012},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36012},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A Sphericity Filter for Space-Filling Designs in Nondeterministic Experiments
AU  - Andrew T. Karl
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/26
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.36012
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.36012
AB  - Space-filling designs support flexible modeling in noisy multi-response experiments, but an individual design can give poor precision for low-order effects. We use a low-order working model to identify effects whose estimation precision we seek to protect, while allowing a more complex final response model. The filter selects one complete design from a candidate pool by minimizing a geometric loss divided by sphericity, without exchanging or altering its points. Sphericity measures the balance of the working-model confidence ellipsoid's principal-axis variances, independently of its volume. In a working-model basis orthonormal over the prediction region, sphericity is the shape factor of the I-criterion, which measures average prediction variance. In cube studies with quadratic least-squares and Gaussian-process fits, this target filter gives modest average prediction gains over the geometrically best candidate at small geometric cost. Gains in working-model precision are largest near saturation: in a four-factor example, worst-decile prediction standard error falls by about a quarter relative to the geometrically best candidate. In constrained mixtures, raw coefficient-based filtering and A-optimality can emphasize extrapolated Scheffe coefficients and yield poor regional prediction precision. Target filtering improves regional working-model precision in most settings studied, mirroring the advantage of I- over A-optimality for highly constrained mixture designs.
ER  -