Network Strategies in Municipal Health Promotion: A Mixed‐Methods Study
- 1Department Health, Long‐term Care and Pensions University Bremen SOCIUM –Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy Bremen Germany
Abstract
Municipal health promotion increasingly relies on intersectoral networks to address complex health challenges amid fragmented health, social and educational systems. However, little is known about how practitioners navigate these networks or how perceived strategies correspond with observed network structures. This convergent mixed‐methods study involved 14 health professionals and combined qualitative interviews with egocentric network analysis. Interview data were analysed using deductive content analysis, while the quantitative component comprised descriptive network analysis based on structural measures of connectivity, centrality and clustering. The qualitative findings show that network strategies are adaptive and situational, shaped by resource constraints, organisational routines, and network development rather than by explicit strategic plans. Bonding strengthened trust and existing relationship, clustering enabled task‐focused collaboration, formalisation supported continuity through established routines and bridging emerged largely unintentionally through routine coordination. Professionals combined strategies flexibly, resulting in hybrid strategic repertories rather than distinct strategy types. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed only partial alignment between reported strategies and observed structures. Crucially, professionals themselves did not always recognise the structurally prominent brokerage positions they held, indicating that brokerage is an emergent feature of everyday networking. These findings suggest that municipal health promotion cannot be characterised by a single form of professional collaboration. Rather, collaboration must adapt to the task at hand, ranging from information exchange and multiprofessional collaboration to intersectoral collaboration. In order to sustain relationship‐based collaboration while retaining the flexibility to respond to local needs and health inequities, municipal health promotion requires institutional support for coordination.
Related
- Understanding digital diffusion and online decision-making in public health promotion: a sequential mixed-methods study of the violence prevention charter in Canada
- Core training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation as non-pharmacological strategies to improve health in sedentary middle-aged men with desk-based occupations: A quasi-experimental controlled health promotion trial
- Health literacy as an indirect pathway in the association between health promotion behaviors and social network addiction symptoms among adolescents.
- An investigation of lifestyle behaviors, mental well-being, and work-related outcomes among female teachers: mixed-methods evidence for occupational health promotion
- Needs assessment to shape rural health research capacity building strategies: a mixed methods study
BibTeX
@article{richter2026network,
title = {{Network Strategies in Municipal Health Promotion: A Mixed‐Methods Study}},
author = {Hanna Richter and Tatiana Mamontova and Eva Quante‐Brandt},
journal = {The International Journal of Health Planning and Management},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1002/hpm.70137},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70137},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Network Strategies in Municipal Health Promotion: A Mixed‐Methods Study
AU - Hanna Richter
AU - Tatiana Mamontova
AU - Eva Quante‐Brandt
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/16
JO - The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
DO - 10.1002/hpm.70137
UR - https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.70137
AB - Municipal health promotion increasingly relies on intersectoral networks to address complex health challenges amid fragmented health, social and educational systems. However, little is known about how practitioners navigate these networks or how perceived strategies correspond with observed network structures. This convergent mixed‐methods study involved 14 health professionals and combined qualitative interviews with egocentric network analysis. Interview data were analysed using deductive content analysis, while the quantitative component comprised descriptive network analysis based on structural measures of connectivity, centrality and clustering. The qualitative findings show that network strategies are adaptive and situational, shaped by resource constraints, organisational routines, and network development rather than by explicit strategic plans. Bonding strengthened trust and existing relationship, clustering enabled task‐focused collaboration, formalisation supported continuity through established routines and bridging emerged largely unintentionally through routine coordination. Professionals combined strategies flexibly, resulting in hybrid strategic repertories rather than distinct strategy types. Integration of qualitative and quantitative data revealed only partial alignment between reported strategies and observed structures. Crucially, professionals themselves did not always recognise the structurally prominent brokerage positions they held, indicating that brokerage is an emergent feature of everyday networking. These findings suggest that municipal health promotion cannot be characterised by a single form of professional collaboration. Rather, collaboration must adapt to the task at hand, ranging from information exchange and multiprofessional collaboration to intersectoral collaboration. In order to sustain relationship‐based collaboration while retaining the flexibility to respond to local needs and health inequities, municipal health promotion requires institutional support for coordination.
SN - 0749-6753
SN - 1099-1751
ER -