Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 28 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYCancers

Dynamic Multi-Phase-Fused Photon-Counting CT for Pre-TACE Feeding Artery Mapping and DSA Procedural Road-Mapping in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

  1. 1Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accurate preoperative feeding artery mapping remains challenging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even with modern CT techniques. This study aimed to optimize dynamic multi-phase photon-counting CT (PCCT) hepatic artery protocols and assess dynamic-fusion PCCT against best single-phase PCCT and energy-integrating-detector dual-energy CT (EID-DECT) for feeding artery detection, vascular-map construction and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) path-planning prior to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC. Methods: This prospective single-center study contained workflow-optimization among cirrhotic non-HCC patients and clinical validation in TACE-candidate HCC patients. Two radiologists performed blinded independent reading. The composite reference standard consisted of DSA, selective/superselective angiography, available cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and embolization records. Primary endpoint: patient-level paired difference in DSA-verified feeding artery coverage. Secondary endpoints included complete-atlas rate, DSA-path-prediction accuracy, missed-vessel count and extrahepatic-supply detection. A pre-specified comparison between dynamic-fusion PCCT and EID-DECT was performed. Results: Dynamic phase 1-6 fusion was the optimal PCCT scheme, while optimal single-phase varied individually. Dynamic-fusion PCCT achieved superior feeding artery coverage (97.78% ± 8.61% vs. 88.33% ± 15.37%, difference 9.44 pp, 95% CI 1.82-17.06, p = 0.016), complete-atlas rate (93.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.039) and path-prediction accuracy (96.67% ± 11.18% vs. 80.00% ± 24.49%), with fewer missed culprit vessels. Two extrahepatic feeders were only detected by dynamic-fusion PCCT. Compared with EID-DECT, dynamic-fusion PCCT showed favorable atlas-related metrics without statistically significant difference in feeding artery coverage. Conclusions: Dynamic-fusion PCCT outperforms single-phase PCCT in pre-TACE feeding artery mapping and DSA path-prediction and shows potential benefits over EID-DECT. It delivers comprehensive preoperative vascular data and may reduce intraoperative exploratory procedures.

Related

  1. Interferon-based HBV function cure therapy reduces hepatocellular carcinoma risk in low-HBsAg chronic hepatitis B patients: a propensity-matched cohort study and dynamic prediction model
    Yurong Gu, Peipei Wang, Qinyao Xu +5
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthCrossrefEurope PMCPMCEurope PMC
  2. Dynamic changes of serum vascular endothelial growth factor after surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma and its application in recurrence monitoring.
    Jirachaya Choovuthayakorn, Phichayut Phinyo, Noraworn Jirattikanwong +5
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMCCrossref
  3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI deep learning model combined with clinical model for noninvasive differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    Huijie Zhang, Lijuan Guo, Fei Jia +5
    Frontiers in OncologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyCrossrefDOAJEurope PMC
  4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma: exploratory analysis of CD3 + TILs, PD-L1, and glypican-3
    Daniele Romeo, Jacob Jalil Hassan, Felix Pfister +7
    European Radiology ExperimentalPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMedical imaging & radiologyPMC
  5. Preoperative Zinc Deficiency as a Novel Prognostic Predictor for Postoperative Recurrence in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    NutrientsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNutritionEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{chen2026dynamic,
  title = {{Dynamic Multi-Phase-Fused Photon-Counting CT for Pre-TACE Feeding Artery Mapping and DSA Procedural Road-Mapping in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.}},
  author = {Hao Chen and Hao Deng and Xin Wei and Xi Liu and Weijuan Chen},
  journal = {Cancers},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/cancers18193152},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882847},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Dynamic Multi-Phase-Fused Photon-Counting CT for Pre-TACE Feeding Artery Mapping and DSA Procedural Road-Mapping in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
AU  - Hao Chen
AU  - Hao Deng
AU  - Xin Wei
AU  - Xi Liu
AU  - Weijuan Chen
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
JO  - Cancers
DO  - 10.3390/cancers18193152
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42882847
AB  - Background/Objectives: Accurate preoperative feeding artery mapping remains challenging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) even with modern CT techniques. This study aimed to optimize dynamic multi-phase photon-counting CT (PCCT) hepatic artery protocols and assess dynamic-fusion PCCT against best single-phase PCCT and energy-integrating-detector dual-energy CT (EID-DECT) for feeding artery detection, vascular-map construction and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) path-planning prior to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC. Methods: This prospective single-center study contained workflow-optimization among cirrhotic non-HCC patients and clinical validation in TACE-candidate HCC patients. Two radiologists performed blinded independent reading. The composite reference standard consisted of DSA, selective/superselective angiography, available cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and embolization records. Primary endpoint: patient-level paired difference in DSA-verified feeding artery coverage. Secondary endpoints included complete-atlas rate, DSA-path-prediction accuracy, missed-vessel count and extrahepatic-supply detection. A pre-specified comparison between dynamic-fusion PCCT and EID-DECT was performed. Results: Dynamic phase 1-6 fusion was the optimal PCCT scheme, while optimal single-phase varied individually. Dynamic-fusion PCCT achieved superior feeding artery coverage (97.78% ± 8.61% vs. 88.33% ± 15.37%, difference 9.44 pp, 95% CI 1.82-17.06, p = 0.016), complete-atlas rate (93.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.039) and path-prediction accuracy (96.67% ± 11.18% vs. 80.00% ± 24.49%), with fewer missed culprit vessels. Two extrahepatic feeders were only detected by dynamic-fusion PCCT. Compared with EID-DECT, dynamic-fusion PCCT showed favorable atlas-related metrics without statistically significant difference in feeding artery coverage. Conclusions: Dynamic-fusion PCCT outperforms single-phase PCCT in pre-TACE feeding artery mapping and DSA path-prediction and shows potential benefits over EID-DECT. It delivers comprehensive preoperative vascular data and may reduce intraoperative exploratory procedures.
SN  - 2072-6694
ER  -