Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 3 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of clinical medicine

Reported Retinal Detachment in Anti-VEGF-Treated Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

6 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, China
  3. 3Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Key Laboratory of Intraocular Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
  4. 4Beijing Ophthalmology & Visual Science Key Lab, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100730, China
  5. 5Department of Ophthalmology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  6. 6Department of Ophthalmology, Xizang Hospital of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Lhasa 857000, China

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the incidence of reported retinal detachment (RD) after primary anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and to explore study-level factors associated with RD incidence. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to 24 May 2026, for English-language studies reporting RD outcomes after anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP. Pooled incidence was estimated with a random-effects model using Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity, subgroup differences, publication bias, and leave-one-out sensitivity were assessed. Results: Twenty-seven studies (5598 eyes; 135 RD events) were included, comprising twelve case series, thirteen cohort studies, and two randomized controlled trials; thus, the evidence was predominantly retrospective. The pooled RD incidence was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.5–2.7%; I2 = 80.8%). The estimate remained stable on leave-one-out sensitivity analysis; the exclusion of Tong et al. markedly reduced heterogeneity. Higher RD incidence was observed in Asian studies, single-center studies, and studies with predominantly Zone I ROP or aggressive ROP (AROP). Incidence varied by postmenstrual age at treatment, gestational age, birth weight, and anti-VEGF agent. No significant publication bias was detected. Conclusions: RD after primary anti-VEGF therapy for ROP is uncommon but sight-threatening, with higher incidence associated with greater disease severity and postmenstrual age. Prolonged, risk-stratified follow-up is warranted for infants with Zone I or AROP. Standardized RD definitions, subtype classification, and severity-adjusted prospective comparisons are needed.

Related

  1. Long-term peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in untreated retinopathy of prematurity with spontaneous regression at or beyond 45 weeks’ postmenstrual age
    Zisan Onaran Uner, Meral Yildiz
    BMC OphthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeneral medicineDOAJPMC
  2. Retinopathy of prematurity among infants in East Africa: a systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Yohannes Godie Ashebir, Olyad Kuma Getahun, Gebeyehu Lakew +18
    International Journal of OphthalmologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textClinical trials & evidence synthesisPMC
  3. Adjunctive dexamethasone implant during vitrectomy with silicone oil for diabetic tractional retinal detachment: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis
    Ahmar Jan Qureshi, Ali Shan Hafeez, Hamna Hassan Siddiqui +6
    International Journal of Retina and VitreousPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMedical imaging & radiologyDOAJ
  4. Explainability-informed patient-disjoint evaluation of deep learning for plus disease in retinopathy of prematurity with an ophthalmologist reader study
    Rouhollah Kian Ara, Jan Kubíček, Sumit Kaushik +2
    Frontiers in medicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Predicting Retinopathy of Prematurity in Thailand: A Practical Model for Risk-Based Screening
    Suppachai Lawanaskol, Jayanton Patumanond, Phichayut Phinyo +6
    Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)Peer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{liu2026reported,
  title = {{Reported Retinal Detachment in Anti-VEGF-Treated Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis}},
  author = {Guina Liu and Guojiao Song and Siqi Wang and Wei Xu and Hanqing Zhao and Yunhan Tao and Wenbin Wei and Xiaoshuang Jiang and Hongtao Liu},
  journal = {Journal of clinical medicine},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.3390/jcm15197598},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666268},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Reported Retinal Detachment in Anti-VEGF-Treated Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
AU  - Guina Liu
AU  - Guojiao Song
AU  - Siqi Wang
AU  - Wei Xu
AU  - Hanqing Zhao
AU  - Yunhan Tao
AU  - Wenbin Wei
AU  - Xiaoshuang Jiang
AU  - Hongtao Liu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/30
JO  - Journal of clinical medicine
DO  - 10.3390/jcm15197598
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/PMC13666268
AB  - Objectives: To estimate the incidence of reported retinal detachment (RD) after primary anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and to explore study-level factors associated with RD incidence. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched up to 24 May 2026, for English-language studies reporting RD outcomes after anti-VEGF monotherapy for ROP. Pooled incidence was estimated with a random-effects model using Freeman–Tukey double arcsine transformation. Heterogeneity, subgroup differences, publication bias, and leave-one-out sensitivity were assessed. Results: Twenty-seven studies (5598 eyes; 135 RD events) were included, comprising twelve case series, thirteen cohort studies, and two randomized controlled trials; thus, the evidence was predominantly retrospective. The pooled RD incidence was 1.4% (95% CI, 0.5–2.7%; I2 = 80.8%). The estimate remained stable on leave-one-out sensitivity analysis; the exclusion of Tong et al. markedly reduced heterogeneity. Higher RD incidence was observed in Asian studies, single-center studies, and studies with predominantly Zone I ROP or aggressive ROP (AROP). Incidence varied by postmenstrual age at treatment, gestational age, birth weight, and anti-VEGF agent. No significant publication bias was detected. Conclusions: RD after primary anti-VEGF therapy for ROP is uncommon but sight-threatening, with higher incidence associated with greater disease severity and postmenstrual age. Prolonged, risk-stratified follow-up is warranted for infants with Zone I or AROP. Standardized RD definitions, subtype classification, and severity-adjusted prospective comparisons are needed.
SN  - 2077-0383
ER  -