Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 37 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Problem-aware sampling for bias and variance reduction in randomised Hamiltonian simulation

Abstract

Randomised quantum simulation algorithms such as qDRIFT reduce circuit depth by replacing deterministic product formulas with stochastic compilations, but achieving high accuracy can require many steps. In vanilla qDRIFT, Hamiltonian terms are sampled with probabilities proportional to their coefficient magnitudes. We propose StateDRIFT, a variant of qDRIFT which optimises its sampling distribution to estimate time-evolved quantities using knowledge of the initial state and target observable, with a provable truncation bound that keeps qDRIFT's guarantees. The distribution at each depth is chosen by solving an optimisation problem targeting bias and/or variance. StateDRIFT can significantly reduce the bias and variance of estimators, and hence circuit depth, which we test on short-time dynamics of lattice models and molecules under Jordan-Wigner up to 18 qubits. For example, with BeH2 StateDRIFT can reduce the number of two-qubit gates required to achieve a given accuracy from 11,201 to 983. StateDRIFT involves measuring observables and commutators on the initial state, so we propose two practical ways to estimate these: classical surrogates such as tensor networks, and classical shadows, which recover most or all of the saving from exact oracles in the systems tested.

Related

  1. Structure-Aware Variance Reduction for Unbiased Randomized Hamiltonian Simulation
    Joshua W. Dai, Fredrik Hasselgren, Chusei Kiumi
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. A variational framework for variance reduction in lattice field theory
    Pietro Butti, Guilherme Catumba, Alessandro Nada +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  3. Latin hypercube sampling to reduce the variance in Monte Carlo integration: a practical guide and an application to gravitational-wave astronomy
    Matteo Boschini, Davide Gerosa
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyHigh-energy astrophysicsarXiv
  4. High-order Magnus expansion for Hamiltonian simulation
    Di Fang, Diyi Liu, Shuchen Zhu
    npj Quantum InformationPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationCrossref
  5. Boundary-Canceled Score-Hamiltonian Sampling
    Masayuki Ohzeki
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{coyle2026problemaware,
  title = {{Problem-aware sampling for bias and variance reduction in randomised Hamiltonian simulation}},
  author = {Brian Coyle and Jonathan H. Fetherolf and Antonio Márquez Romero and Stefano Scali and Giuseppe Buonaiuto and Josh Kirsopp},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.31515},
  eprint = {2610.31515},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31515},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Problem-aware sampling for bias and variance reduction in randomised Hamiltonian simulation
AU  - Brian Coyle
AU  - Jonathan H. Fetherolf
AU  - Antonio Márquez Romero
AU  - Stefano Scali
AU  - Giuseppe Buonaiuto
AU  - Josh Kirsopp
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.31515
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.31515
AB  - Randomised quantum simulation algorithms such as qDRIFT reduce circuit depth by replacing deterministic product formulas with stochastic compilations, but achieving high accuracy can require many steps. In vanilla qDRIFT, Hamiltonian terms are sampled with probabilities proportional to their coefficient magnitudes. We propose StateDRIFT, a variant of qDRIFT which optimises its sampling distribution to estimate time-evolved quantities using knowledge of the initial state and target observable, with a provable truncation bound that keeps qDRIFT's guarantees. The distribution at each depth is chosen by solving an optimisation problem targeting bias and/or variance. StateDRIFT can significantly reduce the bias and variance of estimators, and hence circuit depth, which we test on short-time dynamics of lattice models and molecules under Jordan-Wigner up to 18 qubits. For example, with BeH2 StateDRIFT can reduce the number of two-qubit gates required to achieve a given accuracy from 11,201 to 983. StateDRIFT involves measuring observables and commutators on the initial state, so we propose two practical ways to estimate these: classical surrogates such as tensor networks, and classical shadows, which recover most or all of the saving from exact oracles in the systems tested.
ER  -