Power-law Coupling and Mock Validation of a Surface-density Anisotropy Diagnostic for 85 Rich Galaxy Clusters
Abstract
We assess a surface-density anisotropy diagnostic, Aani, and its association with the slope α of a power-law galaxy profile. We reprocess 20-annulus profiles of 85 optically rich clusters on a canonical grid, 0 ≤ Aani ≤ 1.92, and an extended grid reaching 1.99. Twenty-four canonical fits and 12 extended fits reach their respective upper boundaries; 69 of 85 upper Δχ2=1 bounds remain open, and only four clusters have two-sided intervals. Among 40 preselected power-law fits, the observed α-Aani Spearman coefficient is 0.616. In a model-native forward-recovery experiment with 11 injected values, all 935 noiseless profiles recover the input within 0.02. Across 46,750 Poisson catalogs matched to observed count and background conditions, recovery instead has root-mean-square error (RMSE) 0.992 and Spearman ρ=0.093; 40.0% of fits reach the canonical upper boundary and 81.4% have an open upper interval. Fixing both background and radial scale improves RMSE to 0.564 in a 9,350-catalog sensitivity test. As a separate structural control, 4,250 Poisson catalogs generated from fitted power laws reproduce the observed slope association: the median mock coefficient for the 40-cluster subset is 0.608 (95% range 0.453-0.731). Thus the diagnostic is numerically recoverable under its defining model without noise, but the available photometry does not reliably identify it for individual clusters. The power-law correlation can arise from shared projected profile shape and is not independent evidence for orbital anisotropy.
Related
- Observational Evidence of Velocity Anisotropy Assembly Bias in Galaxy Clusters
- Observational evidence of velocity anisotropy assembly bias in galaxy clusters
- Probing cosmic anisotropy from galaxy clusters via the dipole fitting method
- Binding Energies of Astrophysically Relevant Molecules on CO2 Clusters: Benchmarking and the Donor-Acceptor Origin of Surface-Dependent Binding
- Euclid preparation: XCI. Validation method for the detections in the Euclid Catalogue of Galaxy Clusters using external data
BibTeX
@misc{kutlimuratov2026powerlaw,
title = {{Power-law Coupling and Mock Validation of a Surface-density Anisotropy Diagnostic for 85 Rich Galaxy Clusters}},
author = {Sardor Sharipbayevich Kutlimuratov and Ikram Uralbayevich Tadjibayev},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06941},
eprint = {2610.06941},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06941},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Power-law Coupling and Mock Validation of a Surface-density Anisotropy Diagnostic for 85 Rich Galaxy Clusters
AU - Sardor Sharipbayevich Kutlimuratov
AU - Ikram Uralbayevich Tadjibayev
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/03
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06941
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06941
AB - We assess a surface-density anisotropy diagnostic, A_ani, and its association with the slope α of a power-law galaxy profile. We reprocess 20-annulus profiles of 85 optically rich clusters on a canonical grid, 0 ≤ A_ani ≤ 1.92, and an extended grid reaching 1.99. Twenty-four canonical fits and 12 extended fits reach their respective upper boundaries; 69 of 85 upper Δχ^2=1 bounds remain open, and only four clusters have two-sided intervals. Among 40 preselected power-law fits, the observed α-A_ani Spearman coefficient is 0.616. In a model-native forward-recovery experiment with 11 injected values, all 935 noiseless profiles recover the input within 0.02. Across 46,750 Poisson catalogs matched to observed count and background conditions, recovery instead has root-mean-square error (RMSE) 0.992 and Spearman ρ=0.093; 40.0% of fits reach the canonical upper boundary and 81.4% have an open upper interval. Fixing both background and radial scale improves RMSE to 0.564 in a 9,350-catalog sensitivity test. As a separate structural control, 4,250 Poisson catalogs generated from fitted power laws reproduce the observed slope association: the median mock coefficient for the 40-cluster subset is 0.608 (95% range 0.453-0.731). Thus the diagnostic is numerically recoverable under its defining model without noise, but the available photometry does not reliably identify it for individual clusters. The power-law correlation can arise from shared projected profile shape and is not independent evidence for orbital anisotropy.
ER -