Dissecting Genetic Variability and Multi-Trait Performance in Cucumber
- 1Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University
Abstract
Cucumber improvement requires the simultaneous enhancement of yield, earliness, fruit quality, and postharvest performance, yet many breeding studies rely on single-season or single-trait evaluations. This study therefore assessed 18 diverse cucumber genotypes across two consecutive Rabi seasons (2025 and 2026) using 23 agronomic, phenological, yield, fruit-quality, and postharvest traits, of which 12 non-redundant core traits were retained for the principal genetic and multivariate analyses. Genotypic variability, GCV, PCV, broad-sense heritability, genetic advance, interannual correlation, principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, and multi-trait selection using MGIDI and MTSI were evaluated. Genotype effects were highly significant for nearly all estimable traits in both years (P<0.001). CU-10 produced the highest yield in both years (6.90 and 7.69 t ha-1), followed by CU-11 (4.38 and 4.89 t ha-1) and CU-09 (4.12 and 4.59 t ha-1). Yield showed high GCV (51.80%), PCV (52.21%), broad-sense heritability (98.46%), and GAM (106.04%). Fruit number plant-1 and fruit weight also exhibited high heritability (97.57% and 95.91%) and GAM (80.75% and 59.46%). Interannual repeatability was strongest for fruit number plant-1 (r=0.987), yield (r=0.986), and plant mortality (r=0.981), whereas shelf life was less stable (r=0.426, P=0.078). The first two principal components explained 57.29% of total variation, increasing to 70.92% with PC3. MGIDI selected CU-09, CU-11, and check variety Anuska, whereas MTSI selected CU-11, CU-01, and CU-06. Overall, CU-11 was the only genotype selected by both MGIDI and MTSI, indicating a favourable balance of multi-trait performance and relative interannual stability, while the other selected genotypes provided complementary breeding value for hybridization and further validation. These findings provide an integrated framework for improving productivity, stability, and postharvest performance in cucumber breeding programs.
Related
- Dissecting the genetic basis of yield stability in faba bean by multi-environment analysis
- Genetic variability and multi-trait analysis for enhanced yield stability under acid soil stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
- Dissecting the phenotypic and genetic determinants of maize–bean interactions in intercropping
- Dissecting the genetic basis of rice husk silica content and morphology using GWAS.
- CuFormer U-Net: a transformer-enhanced multi-task network for cucumber leaf disease detection and segmentation
BibTeX
@misc{kayess2026dissecting,
title = {{Dissecting Genetic Variability and Multi-Trait Performance in Cucumber}},
author = {O. Kayess and M. Islam and M. S. Shahriar and M. F. Kabir and M. A. Hossain},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.30.763243},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763243v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Dissecting Genetic Variability and Multi-Trait Performance in Cucumber
AU - O. Kayess
AU - M. Islam
AU - M. S. Shahriar
AU - M. F. Kabir
AU - M. A. Hossain
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.30.763243
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.30.763243v1
AB - Cucumber improvement requires the simultaneous enhancement of yield, earliness, fruit quality, and postharvest performance, yet many breeding studies rely on single-season or single-trait evaluations. This study therefore assessed 18 diverse cucumber genotypes across two consecutive Rabi seasons (2025 and 2026) using 23 agronomic, phenological, yield, fruit-quality, and postharvest traits, of which 12 non-redundant core traits were retained for the principal genetic and multivariate analyses. Genotypic variability, GCV, PCV, broad-sense heritability, genetic advance, interannual correlation, principal component analysis, hierarchical clustering, and multi-trait selection using MGIDI and MTSI were evaluated. Genotype effects were highly significant for nearly all estimable traits in both years (P<0.001). CU-10 produced the highest yield in both years (6.90 and 7.69 t ha-1), followed by CU-11 (4.38 and 4.89 t ha-1) and CU-09 (4.12 and 4.59 t ha-1). Yield showed high GCV (51.80%), PCV (52.21%), broad-sense heritability (98.46%), and GAM (106.04%). Fruit number plant-1 and fruit weight also exhibited high heritability (97.57% and 95.91%) and GAM (80.75% and 59.46%). Interannual repeatability was strongest for fruit number plant-1 (r=0.987), yield (r=0.986), and plant mortality (r=0.981), whereas shelf life was less stable (r=0.426, P=0.078). The first two principal components explained 57.29% of total variation, increasing to 70.92% with PC3. MGIDI selected CU-09, CU-11, and check variety Anuska, whereas MTSI selected CU-11, CU-01, and CU-06. Overall, CU-11 was the only genotype selected by both MGIDI and MTSI, indicating a favourable balance of multi-trait performance and relative interannual stability, while the other selected genotypes provided complementary breeding value for hybridization and further validation. These findings provide an integrated framework for improving productivity, stability, and postharvest performance in cucumber breeding programs.
ER -