Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 9 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Neural means and kernel corrections for operator learning

Abstract

We combine neural network means with exact Matérn kernel regressions of their residuals and of their learned features, and evaluate the pairing on two public emulation problems with published baselines: the structural-mechanics benchmark of de Hoop et al. and the OCO-2 radiative-transfer emulator of Lamminpää et al. On structural mechanics the combination reaches 4.55% test error, matching the best published architecture, and 5.38% against a published 6.49% in the low-data regime. On OCO-2 it improves on the published Gaussian-process emulator on that problem's own test points, outright on two of the three spectral bands; the same kernel that trails the network tenfold on the raw state overtakes it on the network's features, and we measure why (the target's squared native-space norm drops about fortyfold at fixed effective dimension) and prove the mechanism. Where the two families tie instead, the residuals of every architecture we train correlate above 0.86 and their shared component is flat in diversity and sample size, which reads the published plateau as a property of the data. Supporting results include a second-moment identity that predicts stacking outcomes from measured correlations, an optimal-recovery certificate, and a distribution-free coverage band, the only uncertainty signal that survives our tests.

Related

  1. A Semigroup-Aware Kernel Neural Operator with Latent Exponential Integration for Forced PDEs
    Naseem Abbas, Vittorio Colao, Davide Macrì +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAnalysis & PDEsNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  2. The Frame Kernel Method for Multiscale Operator Learning
    Branden Frieden, Ryan Whitehead, M. Keith Ballard +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. Koopman operator learning for predictive control via Khatri-Rao kernel regression
    Mircea Lazar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  4. Numerical Neural Operator: Connection Between Numerical Analysis and the Operator Learning and Building Discretized Neural Operators from Finite Element Methods
    Zecheng Zhang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Learning the Willmore flow with a lightweight neural operator
    Elie Bretin, Roland Denis, Tokuhiro Eto +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{shmalo2026neural,
  title = {{Neural means and kernel corrections for operator learning}},
  author = {Yitzchak Shmalo},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.00389},
  eprint = {2609.00389},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00389},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Neural means and kernel corrections for operator learning
AU  - Yitzchak Shmalo
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.00389
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.00389
AB  - We combine neural network means with exact Matérn kernel regressions of their residuals and of their learned features, and evaluate the pairing on two public emulation problems with published baselines: the structural-mechanics benchmark of de Hoop et al. and the OCO-2 radiative-transfer emulator of Lamminpää et al. On structural mechanics the combination reaches 4.55% test error, matching the best published architecture, and 5.38% against a published 6.49% in the low-data regime. On OCO-2 it improves on the published Gaussian-process emulator on that problem's own test points, outright on two of the three spectral bands; the same kernel that trails the network tenfold on the raw state overtakes it on the network's features, and we measure why (the target's squared native-space norm drops about fortyfold at fixed effective dimension) and prove the mechanism. Where the two families tie instead, the residuals of every architecture we train correlate above 0.86 and their shared component is flat in diversity and sample size, which reads the published plateau as a property of the data. Supporting results include a second-moment identity that predicts stacking outcomes from measured correlations, an optimal-recovery certificate, and a distribution-free coverage band, the only uncertainty signal that survives our tests.
ER  -