Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
186,123 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics

Ray Tracing Method in a General Non‐Dipole Magnetic Field

Abstract

We present a new general mathematical formulation of the Eikonal equations for ray tracing, which can use any internal magnetic field model. The analytical and tractable expressions are conveniently based on a vector formalism, which is independent of any coordinate system. This formalism is newly introduced in the widely used BAS HOTRAY code and tested for frequencies ranging from 1 to 20 kHz, covering lightning and navy transmitter frequencies. We show and quantify the tremendous role of the magnetic field model, testing from the pure dipole field to the full International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model. Most often, the longitudinal drift of the rays computed with different geomagnetic models makes a notable difference among them, being absent for rays computed with a pure dipole. The error in path length of the dipole‐based rays can be 100% different than the IGRF‐based ray. Dipole‐based rays are most often drastically erroneous in ray path or final footprint. Rays computed with IGRF or an eccentric‐tilted dipole can often agree within a reasonable error range, but not systematically. We find a major importance of the initial wave normal angle and initial azimuthal angle in ray paths. Our study concludes that major ray tracing study should use a realistic magnetic field model to be predictive. Yet, the method remains to be extended to general external magnetic field and more realistic cold plasma density models.

Related

  1. A comparative study of pseudo-dipole arrays and standard arrays based on the high-density DC resistivity method
    Xiaoyi Jiang, Shuhai Jiang, Hui Chen +2
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textElectrochemistry & energyGeology & geochemistryPLOS
  2. Reply to “On the Author Correction to “Magnetic field screening in hydride superconductors (Nature Comm. 13, 8144 (2024))”
    V. S. Minkov, E. F. Talantsev, V. Ksenofontov +3
    Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGeophysics & seismologyCrossref
  3. The hypervariational method: a general, automated technique based on innovations to tune the parameters of the Hybrid covariance matrix
    Francesco Sardelli, Craig H. Bishop
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textAtmospheric science & meteorologyStatisticsarXiv
  4. A field observation method to characterize site soundscape and improve detection probability estimation for eastern bat species in North America
    Daniel Peacock, Sihao Chen, Jorge Rivera +4
    EcoEvoRxivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textEcologyEnvironmental science & pollutionEcoEvoRxiv
  5. Seismic signature of a magnetic field in the γ Doradus star KIC 2309579
    S. Ihallaine, J. Ballot, F. Lignières +4
    Astronomy & Astrophysics - A&APeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSolar & stellar physicsGeneral earth scienceHAL
BibTeX
@article{blelly2026tracing,
  title = {{Ray Tracing Method in a General Non‐Dipole Magnetic Field}},
  author = {P.‐l. Blelly and J.‐f. Ripoll and A. Dubois and R. Horne and Aurélie Marchaudon},
  journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research  Space Physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = jul,
  doi = {10.1029/2026ja035419},
  url = {https://hal.science/hal-05767104v1},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Ray Tracing Method in a General Non‐Dipole Magnetic Field
AU  - P.‐l. Blelly
AU  - J.‐f. Ripoll
AU  - A. Dubois
AU  - R. Horne
AU  - Aurélie Marchaudon
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/31
JO  - Journal of Geophysical Research  Space Physics
DO  - 10.1029/2026ja035419
UR  - https://hal.science/hal-05767104v1
AB  - We present a new general mathematical formulation of the Eikonal equations for ray tracing, which can use any internal magnetic field model. The analytical and tractable expressions are conveniently based on a vector formalism, which is independent of any coordinate system. This formalism is newly introduced in the widely used BAS HOTRAY code and tested for frequencies ranging from 1 to 20 kHz, covering lightning and navy transmitter frequencies. We show and quantify the tremendous role of the magnetic field model, testing from the pure dipole field to the full International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) model. Most often, the longitudinal drift of the rays computed with different geomagnetic models makes a notable difference among them, being absent for rays computed with a pure dipole. The error in path length of the dipole‐based rays can be 100% different than the IGRF‐based ray. Dipole‐based rays are most often drastically erroneous in ray path or final footprint. Rays computed with IGRF or an eccentric‐tilted dipole can often agree within a reasonable error range, but not systematically. We find a major importance of the initial wave normal angle and initial azimuthal angle in ray paths. Our study concludes that major ray tracing study should use a realistic magnetic field model to be predictive. Yet, the method remains to be extended to general external magnetic field and more realistic cold plasma density models.
SN  - 2169-9380
SN  - 2169-9402
ER  -