Sequential Sampling as a Computational Principle of Episodic Memory
- 1Max Planck Institute for Cognitive and Brain Sciences
Abstract
Visual perception unfolds through sequential eye movements, yet computational models of episodic memory typically assume that event representations already exist. Here, we propose that sequential gaze sampling does not simply supply memory with visual information, but contributes to the construction and organisation of episodic representations. We introduce a computational model in which successive fixations are integrated into an evolving internal representation, subsequently stored in associative memory and later retrieved through partial reinstatement of the original sampling trajectory. Within to-be-remembered elements, successive samples support progressive individuation; between elements, more frequent transitions strengthen relational binding. As sampling proceeds, internal representations become progressively lower-dimensional while retaining information about where samples were taken and when they occurred in the sequence. Sampling history also remains embedded in the resulting representation: changing the order of otherwise identical samples alters both the representation itself and element-specific retrieval. At retrieval, reinstating more of the original sampling trajectory improves access to specific elements, while competition is strongest when memories share both semantic category and sampling history. Finally, an exploratory generative readout shows that regions sampled during encoding are reconstructed more faithfully than unsampled regions. Together, these findings suggest that sequential sampling provides a candidate computational process through which episodic representations are constructed, shaping their subsequent storage and retrieval.
Related
- Episodic memory rescues working memory via pattern separation, pattern completion, and predictive recall
- Delayed maturation of hippocampal trisynaptic circuitry underlies the protracted development of episodic-like memory
- The Cost to Scroll: Short-form Video Use and Episodic Memory
- Lifespan accumulated differences in semantic memory structure contribute to increases in episodic false memories
- Learning distributed representations with complementary components - A generative approximation framework for episodic memory encoding
BibTeX
@misc{kerren2026sequential,
title = {{Sequential Sampling as a Computational Principle of Episodic Memory}},
author = {C. Kerren and S. Dixit and E. Coxon and A. R. Nikolaev and C. F. Doeller},
howpublished = {bioRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.64898/2026.10.08.757704},
url = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757704v1},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Sequential Sampling as a Computational Principle of Episodic Memory
AU - C. Kerren
AU - S. Dixit
AU - E. Coxon
AU - A. R. Nikolaev
AU - C. F. Doeller
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/08
PB - bioRxiv
DO - 10.64898/2026.10.08.757704
UR - https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.10.08.757704v1
AB - Visual perception unfolds through sequential eye movements, yet computational models of episodic memory typically assume that event representations already exist. Here, we propose that sequential gaze sampling does not simply supply memory with visual information, but contributes to the construction and organisation of episodic representations. We introduce a computational model in which successive fixations are integrated into an evolving internal representation, subsequently stored in associative memory and later retrieved through partial reinstatement of the original sampling trajectory. Within to-be-remembered elements, successive samples support progressive individuation; between elements, more frequent transitions strengthen relational binding. As sampling proceeds, internal representations become progressively lower-dimensional while retaining information about where samples were taken and when they occurred in the sequence. Sampling history also remains embedded in the resulting representation: changing the order of otherwise identical samples alters both the representation itself and element-specific retrieval. At retrieval, reinstating more of the original sampling trajectory improves access to specific elements, while competition is strongest when memories share both semantic category and sampling history. Finally, an exploratory generative readout shows that regions sampled during encoding are reconstructed more faithfully than unsampled regions. Together, these findings suggest that sequential sampling provides a candidate computational process through which episodic representations are constructed, shaping their subsequent storage and retrieval.
ER -