Acoustic indices can be driven by habitat characteristics rather than bird diversity
Abstract
Acoustic indices are widely used to assess biodiversity, including bird diversity. However, numerous studies have reported weak relationships between acoustic indices and biodiversity metrics, with the underlying mechanisms remaining poorly understood. Using point-count survey data and acoustic recordings from a subtropical forest in eastern China, we examined the factors influencing the relationship between acoustic indices and bird diversity, including the point-count radius and single versus multi-index usage. In addition, we used path analyses to quantitatively assess the direct and indirect effects of terrain and vegetation on bird diversity and acoustic indices, with the aim of identifying key factors and mechanisms influencing the relationship between acoustic indices and bird diversity. Our results revealed that a point count survey radius of 75 m yielded the strongest association between acoustic indices and bird diversity, albeit weak (correlation coefficients ranged from −0.45 to 0.48, with many nonsignificant relationships). Moreover, contrary to expectations, combining multiple acoustic indices did not produce a stronger relationship, suggesting that combining indices may be ineffective in measuring bird diversity when they respond in opposing directions across ecological contexts. Path models revealed that, compared to bird diversity, habitat characteristics, particularly terrain and canopy height, had a greater influence on acoustic indices. Our findings suggest that acoustic indices may be more strongly influenced by habitat characteristics or other unmeasured taxa, limiting their reliability as measures of bird diversity.
Related
- Climate-driven spatial patterns of diversity, phenology, and habitat suitability in Pyrenaria (Theaceae) across Northeast India
- Ecological habitat characterization of baleen whales in the northern Mozambique Channel: Linking seasonal acoustic detections with environmental drivers
- Acoustic Vector Sensing of Blue and Fin Whale Habitat Occupancy off Central California
- Acoustic Monitoring of Tropical Bats: Saccopteryx bilineata's response to habitat and time across a restoration gradient using a 2D-CNN
- Salinity is associated with habitat use and mitochondrial lineage diversity in halophilic Ephydra flies (Diptera: Ephydridae)
BibTeX
@article{chen2026acoustic,
title = {{Acoustic indices can be driven by habitat characteristics rather than bird diversity}},
author = {You-Fang Chen and Christos Mammides and Sheng Li and Kevin F.A. Darras and Xiaoli Shen},
journal = {Environmental and Sustainability Indicators},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1016/j.indic.2026.101412},
url = {https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05705222v1},
note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Acoustic indices can be driven by habitat characteristics rather than bird diversity
AU - You-Fang Chen
AU - Christos Mammides
AU - Sheng Li
AU - Kevin F.A. Darras
AU - Xiaoli Shen
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/08
JO - Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
DO - 10.1016/j.indic.2026.101412
UR - https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-05705222v1
AB - Acoustic indices are widely used to assess biodiversity, including bird diversity. However, numerous studies have reported weak relationships between acoustic indices and biodiversity metrics, with the underlying mechanisms remaining poorly understood. Using point-count survey data and acoustic recordings from a subtropical forest in eastern China, we examined the factors influencing the relationship between acoustic indices and bird diversity, including the point-count radius and single versus multi-index usage. In addition, we used path analyses to quantitatively assess the direct and indirect effects of terrain and vegetation on bird diversity and acoustic indices, with the aim of identifying key factors and mechanisms influencing the relationship between acoustic indices and bird diversity. Our results revealed that a point count survey radius of 75 m yielded the strongest association between acoustic indices and bird diversity, albeit weak (correlation coefficients ranged from −0.45 to 0.48, with many nonsignificant relationships). Moreover, contrary to expectations, combining multiple acoustic indices did not produce a stronger relationship, suggesting that combining indices may be ineffective in measuring bird diversity when they respond in opposing directions across ecological contexts. Path models revealed that, compared to bird diversity, habitat characteristics, particularly terrain and canopy height, had a greater influence on acoustic indices. Our findings suggest that acoustic indices may be more strongly influenced by habitat characteristics or other unmeasured taxa, limiting their reliability as measures of bird diversity.
SN - 2665-9727
ER -