Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 38 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYBMC veterinary research

Association between antimicrobials administered and antimicrobial resistance profiles in food-producing animals in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

8 affiliations
  1. 1Université Joseph KI ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. [email protected].
  2. 2Institut de Recherche en Sciences Appliquées et Technologies, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
  3. 3Université Joseph KI ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  4. 4Clinical Research Unit of Nanoro, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  5. 5Ministère de la Santé, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  6. 6Centre Universitaire de Tenkodogo, Tenkodogo, Burkina Faso.
  7. 7Institut de l'Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
  8. 8Institut National de Santé Publique, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance in farm animals is a growing threat to public health and food safety, particularly in West Africa, where antimicrobial use is often unregulated. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between the antimicrobials administered in livestock farming systems (including both terrestrial livestock and aquatic species) and the antimicrobial resistance profiles reported in laboratory research studies in West Africa, assessing the alignment between field usage and laboratory surveillance data.Methods

This study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. This review involves an exhaustive literature search, the selection of studies based on predefined criteria, data extraction, and a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the data. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 on antimicrobials use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles were downloaded from PubMed, Scopus, African Journals Online (AJOL), and Google Scholar. Pooled antimicrobial resistance prevalence was estimated using random-effects metanalysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Cochran's Q test, whereas, publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots visualization and statistically tested using Egger's regression test. The association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. All analyses were performed using R (v4.5.2), and results were considered significant at p < 0.05.Results

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 102 eligible studies on antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals. The single pooled antimicrobial resistance prevalence was estimated at 40% (95% CI: 35-45%) using a random-effects model, with substantial heterogeneity among studies (I² = 99.4%). The subgroup antimicrobial resistance prevalence was considerably substantial for sulphonamides (73%), tetracyclines (69%), penicillin (60%), and macrolides (55%), whereas but low for carbapenems (10%) and other antimicrobial classes. Antimicrobial use patterns varied according to animal species, with therapeutic use predominating in cattle and pigs, whereas prophylactic use was more frequently reported in poultry and small ruminants. In fish, therapeutic and prophylactic uses were reported at comparable levels. An ecological association was observed between reported antimicrobial use patterns and antimicrobial resistance profiles (Spearman's ρ = 0.41; p = 0.013).Conclusions

This meta-analysis identifies an association between reported antimicrobial usage and antimicrobial resistance profiles in West African livestock. While this confirms a link between field practices and laboratory findings, data heterogeneity necessitates cautious interpretation. Our findings highlight the urgent need for standardized, coupled monitoring of antimicrobial consumption and resistance to inform robust regional control strategies.

Related

  1. Predicting antimicrobial resistance in Africa using machine learning: a systematic review
    UF Ofodile
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMCEurope PMC
  2. In vitro antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of bacterial pathogens causing bovine respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Q. Mahmood, P. Rasmussen, P. P. Damborg +10
    bioRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textMicrobiologybioRxiv
  3. Schistosoma-Salmonella co-infection in Africa: Epidemiology, biological mechanisms, and antimicrobial resistance: A systematic review and meta analysis
    Brhane Berhe, Hadush Negash, Tesfay Abadi +5
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyZoology & animal behaviourPLOSEurope PMCPMC
  4. Geographic and genomic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in indian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sunil Kumar, Santenna Chenchula, Rahul Bhalsenge +14
    BMC PediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textMicrobiologyDOAJ
  5. Data heterogeneity and algorithmic bias in AI-based antimicrobial resistance prediction: a systematic review and mitigation framework
    Jema Kiazolu
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMicrobiologyPMCEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{soma2026association,
  title = {{Association between antimicrobials administered and antimicrobial resistance profiles in food-producing animals in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.}},
  author = {Djifahamaï Soma and Namwin Siourimè Somda and Fatimata B J Diarra and Djibril Diallo and Zakaria Garba and Souleymane Sore and Evariste Bako and Marguerite E M Nikiema and Nicolas Barro and Isidore J O Bonkoungou},
  journal = {BMC veterinary research},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1186/s12917-026-05971-1},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972383},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Association between antimicrobials administered and antimicrobial resistance profiles in food-producing animals in West Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
AU  - Djifahamaï Soma
AU  - Namwin Siourimè Somda
AU  - Fatimata B J Diarra
AU  - Djibril Diallo
AU  - Zakaria Garba
AU  - Souleymane Sore
AU  - Evariste Bako
AU  - Marguerite E M Nikiema
AU  - Nicolas Barro
AU  - Isidore J O Bonkoungou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/04
JO  - BMC veterinary research
DO  - 10.1186/s12917-026-05971-1
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972383
AB  - Background  Antimicrobial resistance in farm animals is a growing threat to public health and food safety, particularly in West Africa, where antimicrobial use is often unregulated. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the association between the antimicrobials administered in livestock farming systems (including both terrestrial livestock and aquatic species) and the antimicrobial resistance profiles reported in laboratory research studies in West Africa, assessing the alignment between field usage and laboratory surveillance data.Methods  This study was conducted as a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA 2020 protocol. This review involves an exhaustive literature search, the selection of studies based on predefined criteria, data extraction, and a qualitative and quantitative synthesis of the data. Studies published between 2015 and 2025 on antimicrobials use and antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals, were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles were downloaded from PubMed, Scopus, African Journals Online (AJOL), and Google Scholar. Pooled antimicrobial resistance prevalence was estimated using random-effects metanalysis. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using I² and Cochran's Q test, whereas, publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots visualization and statistically tested using Egger's regression test. The association between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance was assessed using Spearman's rank correlation. All analyses were performed using R (v4.5.2), and results were considered significant at p < 0.05.Results  This systematic review and meta-analysis included 102 eligible studies on antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals. The single pooled antimicrobial resistance prevalence was estimated at 40% (95% CI: 35-45%) using a random-effects model, with substantial heterogeneity among studies (I² = 99.4%). The subgroup antimicrobial resistance prevalence was considerably substantial for sulphonamides (73%), tetracyclines (69%), penicillin (60%), and macrolides (55%), whereas but low for carbapenems (10%) and other antimicrobial classes. Antimicrobial use patterns varied according to animal species, with therapeutic use predominating in cattle and pigs, whereas prophylactic use was more frequently reported in poultry and small ruminants. In fish, therapeutic and prophylactic uses were reported at comparable levels. An ecological association was observed between reported antimicrobial use patterns and antimicrobial resistance profiles (Spearman's ρ = 0.41; p = 0.013).Conclusions  This meta-analysis identifies an association between reported antimicrobial usage and antimicrobial resistance profiles in West African livestock. While this confirms a link between field practices and laboratory findings, data heterogeneity necessitates cautious interpretation. Our findings highlight the urgent need for standardized, coupled monitoring of antimicrobial consumption and resistance to inform robust regional control strategies.
SN  - 1746-6148
ER  -