Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 16 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Suppressing Frequency Collisions in a Quantum Processor

Abstract

Frequency crowding, the close spacing of qubit transitions, limits superconducting quantum processors through crosstalk, leakage, and spectator dependent errors. We introduce a Hamiltonian based framework that maps two- and three-body collision mechanisms onto a Max-k-Cut problem on qubit frequency allocation. In order to make larger lattices tractable, we introduce a cluster-stitching protocol that decomposes larger lattices into overlapping subgraphs and reconciles their local frequency assignments into globally consistent configurations. We tested our proposed framework across multiple qubit architectures to suppress dominant collision penalties by revealing a hardware residual crosstalk. We benchmark digitized counterdiabatic QAOA (DC-QAOA), standard QAOA, and simulated annealing. Counterdiabatic terms improve QAOA optimization near steep collision penalties, while simulated annealing achieves the lowest costs on the tested instances. These results indicate that our hardware-aware optimization connects microscopic interaction physics to processor-level frequency planning. These results enable a systematic solver for benchmarking of scalable software hardware co design.

Related

  1. Dynamically suppressing cavity dephasing induced by frequency fluctuations of a coupled nonlinear mode
    Yunwei Lu, Xinyuan You, Ziwen Huang +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Observation and Modulation of the Quantum Mpemba Effect on a Superconducting Quantum Processor
    Yueshan Xu, Cai-Ping Fang, B. Chen +33
    Physical Review LettersPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text31 citedAtomic, molecular & optical physicsOpenAlex
  3. Exploring the Relaxation Landscape of a 2D Quantum Magnet on a 256-Qubit Processor
    Tiago Mendes-Santos, Joseph Vovrosh, Sergi Julià-Farré +33
    HALPreprintLicence not statedQuantum physics & quantum informationHAL
  4. Exploring Quantum Phase Transitions Beyond Landau Theory on a Quantum Processor
    Ruizhe Shen, Yin Zhong, Ching Hua Lee
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textCondensed matterQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  5. LYNX - A trapped-ion quantum information processor
    Alexander Erhard, Georg Jacob, Max Hettrich +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{kaur2026suppressing,
  title = {{Suppressing Frequency Collisions in a Quantum Processor}},
  author = {Kuljeet Kaur and Xuexin Xu and Mohammad H. Ansari},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06264},
  eprint = {2610.06264},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06264},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Suppressing Frequency Collisions in a Quantum Processor
AU  - Kuljeet Kaur
AU  - Xuexin Xu
AU  - Mohammad H. Ansari
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06264
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06264
AB  - Frequency crowding, the close spacing of qubit transitions, limits superconducting quantum processors through crosstalk, leakage, and spectator dependent errors. We introduce a Hamiltonian based framework that maps two- and three-body collision mechanisms onto a Max-k-Cut problem on qubit frequency allocation. In order to make larger lattices tractable, we introduce a cluster-stitching protocol that decomposes larger lattices into overlapping subgraphs and reconciles their local frequency assignments into globally consistent configurations. We tested our proposed framework across multiple qubit architectures to suppress dominant collision penalties by revealing a hardware residual crosstalk. We benchmark digitized counterdiabatic QAOA (DC-QAOA), standard QAOA, and simulated annealing. Counterdiabatic terms improve QAOA optimization near steep collision penalties, while simulated annealing achieves the lowest costs on the tested instances. These results indicate that our hardware-aware optimization connects microscopic interaction physics to processor-level frequency planning. These results enable a systematic solver for benchmarking of scalable software hardware co design.
ER  -