Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Opioid-free Anaesthesia Using Intravenous Magnesium, Lidocaine, and Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Opioid-based Anaesthesia in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial
- 1Aarupadai Veedu Medical College & Hospital Clinic of Anaesthesiology, Puducherry, India
Abstract
Objective: Opioid-based anaesthesia is a standard practice in laparoscopic surgeries. However, it is associated with adverse effects that can limit its use. To address these issues, opioid-free anaesthesia has been introduced as an alternative. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of opioid-free anaesthesia, incorporating magnesium, lidocaine, and an erector spinae plane block (ESPB), with traditional opioid-based anaesthesia during laparoscopic procedures.
Methods: Seventy patients aged 18-60 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 35 each. Opioid-free group received opioid-free anaesthesia, which included an intravenous (IV) bolus of 2 g magnesium, a continuous lidocaine infusion at 1.5 mg kg-1 hr-1, and a bilateral ESPB with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Opioid-based group received opioid-based anaesthesia with an IV dose of 2 µg kg-1 fentanyl. Postoperative pain and the need for rescue analgesia were assessed for 24 h. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters were recorded, and the incidence of postoperative complications, including sedation, nausea, vomiting, and shivering, was monitored for 24 h.
Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in the opioid-free group compared to the opioid-based group at 0 h (P < 0.001), 2 h (P < 0.001), and 4 h (P=0.005) postoperatively. The opioid-based group required rescue analgesia more frequently (P < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the opioid-free group than in the opioid-based group (P < 0.001). Haemodynamic parameters were similar between the two groups.
Conclusion: Opioid-free anaesthesia provides superior postoperative analgesia and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications compared with opioid-based anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery.
Related
- Shoulder‐Tip Pain After Laparoscopic Surgery: A Narrative Review of Intraperitoneal Anaesthesia
- Postoperative anaesthesia follow-up via telemedicine after outpatient surgery: a proof-of-concept study.
- Effect of perioperative opioid-sparing multimodal analgesia on early postoperative sleep disturbance in adults undergoing elective non-cardiac, non-obstetric surgery under general anaesthesia: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PC6 injection enhanced the preventive effect against postoperative nausea of granisetron compared with intravenous injection in gynecological laparoscopic patients: a randomized controlled study
- Comparison of remimazolam total intravenous anesthesia versus sevoflurane inhalational anesthesia on emergence agitation in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for gastric or colorectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BibTeX
@article{jerfiha2026comparison,
title = {{Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Opioid-free Anaesthesia Using Intravenous Magnesium, Lidocaine, and Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Opioid-based Anaesthesia in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial}},
author = {Jerfiha VJ and Ezhilrajan Vaithiyalingam and Pradeesh Johny},
journal = {Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.4274/tjar.2026.241747},
url = {https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.241747},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy Between Opioid-free Anaesthesia Using Intravenous Magnesium, Lidocaine, and Erector Spinae Plane Block, and Opioid-based Anaesthesia in Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomised Controlled Trial
AU - Jerfiha VJ
AU - Ezhilrajan Vaithiyalingam
AU - Pradeesh Johny
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/30
JO - Turkish Journal of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation
DO - 10.4274/tjar.2026.241747
UR - https://doi.org/10.4274/tjar.2026.241747
AB - Objective: Opioid-based anaesthesia is a standard practice in laparoscopic surgeries. However, it is associated with adverse effects that can limit its use. To address these issues, opioid-free anaesthesia has been introduced as an alternative. This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of opioid-free anaesthesia, incorporating magnesium, lidocaine, and an erector spinae plane block (ESPB), with traditional opioid-based anaesthesia during laparoscopic procedures. Methods: Seventy patients aged 18-60 years undergoing laparoscopic surgery were randomly divided into two groups of 35 each. Opioid-free group received opioid-free anaesthesia, which included an intravenous (IV) bolus of 2 g magnesium, a continuous lidocaine infusion at 1.5 mg kg-1 hr-1, and a bilateral ESPB with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Opioid-based group received opioid-based anaesthesia with an IV dose of 2 µg kg-1 fentanyl. Postoperative pain and the need for rescue analgesia were assessed for 24 h. Perioperative haemodynamic parameters were recorded, and the incidence of postoperative complications, including sedation, nausea, vomiting, and shivering, was monitored for 24 h. Results: Pain scores were significantly lower in the opioid-free group compared to the opioid-based group at 0 h (P < 0.001), 2 h (P < 0.001), and 4 h (P=0.005) postoperatively. The opioid-based group required rescue analgesia more frequently (P < 0.001). Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the opioid-free group than in the opioid-based group (P < 0.001). Haemodynamic parameters were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Opioid-free anaesthesia provides superior postoperative analgesia and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications compared with opioid-based anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery.
SN - 2667-677X
SN - 2667-6370
ER -