Exploring multilevel determinants of nursing documentation quality in suicide care: A qualitative Study in Iranian hospitals
5 affiliations
- 1Student Research Committee, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran
- 2Department of Public Health, Sirjan School of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran
- 3Assistant Professor of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
- 4School of Medicine, Jiroft University of Medical Sciences, Jiroft, Iran
- 5Department of Public Health, Behbahan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Behbahan, Iran
Abstract
Background: High-quality nursing documentation is crucial for patient safety, continuity of care, and legal accountability, particularly in suicide-related care. Despite its importance, documentation practices in such sensitive contexts are influenced by multiple interacting factors. This study aimed to explore the determinants of high-quality nursing documentation in suicide cases from the perspectives of nurses and clinical supervisors in Iran. Methods: A qualitative study using conventional content analysis was conducted in 2024 across multiple hospitals in Iran. Purposive sampling with maximum variation was used to recruit 25 participants, including registered nurses, head nurses, and clinical supervisors involved in suicide care. Maximum variation was ensured across hospital types (general hospitals with emergency departments and specialized psychiatric units), clinical roles, years of experience, and geographical regions. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following Graneheim and Lundman’s approach. MAXQDA 2022 software was used for data management. Trustworthiness was ensured using Lincoln and Guba’s criteria. Results: Analysis revealed eight main interrelated themes encompassing organizational, professional, interpersonal, and systemic determinants of nursing documentation quality. These included Work Environment and Organizational Support, Professional Knowledge and Competence, Training and Continuing Education, Communication and Collaboration, Staffing and Workload Balance, Motivation and Accountability, Use of Technology and Resources, and Supervision and Feedback. Together, these factors acted as both facilitators and barriers, shaping the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of nursing documentation in suicide- related care. Beyond common documentation factors, the findings highlighted suicide-specific challenges, including the need for precise recording of fluctuating suicide risk, documentation of sensitive patient disclosures, ethical tensions between confidentiality and safety, and the impact of high-stress, time-critical decision-making on documentation accuracy. Conclusion: The findings indicate that improving documentation requires a multifaceted approach that strengthens professional capacity, fosters supportive organizational cultures, optimizes workload and resources, leverages appropriate technologies, and ensures constructive supervision. Particularly in suicide care, where documentation has critical clinical and legal implications, targeted strategies are needed to support accurate recording of risk, patient behavior, and interdisciplinary decision-making. Addressing these determinants through targeted training, supportive organizational policies, adequate staffing, and structured supervision can enhance patient safety, continuity of care, and the effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts.
Related
- The transition to reusable medical products in NHS hospitals in England and Wales: A theoretical domains framework informed qualitative study
- Beyond the trees: Exploring the determinants of intercrop management intensity in smallholder immature rubber systems in Thailand
- Colours of the mind: A qualitative study exploring the relationship between neurodivergence and creativity
- Exploring factors contributing to inappropriate use of antibiotics for common childhood illnesses among parents in Nepal: a qualitative study
- Comprehensive Phenological Documentation of Idesia polycarpa Using the BBCH Scale: From Bud Development to Dormancy
BibTeX
@article{yusefi2026exploring,
title = {{Exploring multilevel determinants of nursing documentation quality in suicide care: A qualitative Study in Iranian hospitals}},
author = {Ali Reza Yusefi and Omolbanin Atashbahar and Ali Asghar Kheirkhah Vakilabad and Hedyeh Askarpour and Jamshid Bahmeai},
journal = {PLOS One},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0356460},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356460},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Exploring multilevel determinants of nursing documentation quality in suicide care: A qualitative Study in Iranian hospitals
AU - Ali Reza Yusefi
AU - Omolbanin Atashbahar
AU - Ali Asghar Kheirkhah Vakilabad
AU - Hedyeh Askarpour
AU - Jamshid Bahmeai
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/02
JO - PLOS One
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0356460
UR - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356460
AB - Background: High-quality nursing documentation is crucial for patient safety, continuity of care, and legal accountability, particularly in suicide-related care. Despite its importance, documentation practices in such sensitive contexts are influenced by multiple interacting factors. This study aimed to explore the determinants of high-quality nursing documentation in suicide cases from the perspectives of nurses and clinical supervisors in Iran. Methods: A qualitative study using conventional content analysis was conducted in 2024 across multiple hospitals in Iran. Purposive sampling with maximum variation was used to recruit 25 participants, including registered nurses, head nurses, and clinical supervisors involved in suicide care. Maximum variation was ensured across hospital types (general hospitals with emergency departments and specialized psychiatric units), clinical roles, years of experience, and geographical regions. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed following Graneheim and Lundman’s approach. MAXQDA 2022 software was used for data management. Trustworthiness was ensured using Lincoln and Guba’s criteria. Results: Analysis revealed eight main interrelated themes encompassing organizational, professional, interpersonal, and systemic determinants of nursing documentation quality. These included Work Environment and Organizational Support, Professional Knowledge and Competence, Training and Continuing Education, Communication and Collaboration, Staffing and Workload Balance, Motivation and Accountability, Use of Technology and Resources, and Supervision and Feedback. Together, these factors acted as both facilitators and barriers, shaping the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of nursing documentation in suicide- related care. Beyond common documentation factors, the findings highlighted suicide-specific challenges, including the need for precise recording of fluctuating suicide risk, documentation of sensitive patient disclosures, ethical tensions between confidentiality and safety, and the impact of high-stress, time-critical decision-making on documentation accuracy. Conclusion: The findings indicate that improving documentation requires a multifaceted approach that strengthens professional capacity, fosters supportive organizational cultures, optimizes workload and resources, leverages appropriate technologies, and ensures constructive supervision. Particularly in suicide care, where documentation has critical clinical and legal implications, targeted strategies are needed to support accurate recording of risk, patient behavior, and interdisciplinary decision-making. Addressing these determinants through targeted training, supportive organizational policies, adequate staffing, and structured supervision can enhance patient safety, continuity of care, and the effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts.
SN - 1932-6203
ER -