Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,693 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYNeurobiology of Disease

Treatment-refractory autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: Clinical features, predictive models, therapy

2 more authors
4 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Geriatrics, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  2. 2Department of Neurology, Institute of Neuroscience, Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Key Clinical Specialty (Clinical Medicine Research Institute), The Second Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
  3. 3Department of Neurology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  4. 4Department of Pathology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510630, China

Abstract

Background and objectives: A subset of glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy experiences treatment-refractory disease course, yet the clinical and immunological features defining this subgroup remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Patients were classified as treatment-refractory ( n = 23) or treatment-responsive ( n = 30). Clinical, imaging, and outcomes were compared. For subgroup analyses, refractory patients were divided into three groups: no immunoadsorption/plasma exchange (IA/PE) ( n = 9), IA/PE monotherapy ( n = 4), and IA/PE plus rituximab ( n = 10), with functional outcomes compared across groups. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) from refractory patients was applied to a passive transfer mouse model, and single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to explore underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Results: The treatment-refractory group had higher proportion of the meningoencephalomyelitis phenotype (82.6% vs. 53.3%, P = 0.026) and more frequent disturbances of consciousness (65.2% vs. 30.0%, P = 0.011), paraplegia (78.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001), and peripheral nervous system involvement (89.5% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001). Refractory patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain levels. Refractory patients more frequently exhibited spinal cord lesions involving three or more segments (65.2% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002). Disability at last follow-up was greater in the refractory group (median modified Rankin Scale score 3 vs. 1, P < 0.0001). Firth penalized regression model identified peripheral nervous system involvement as the independent predictor of treatment refractoriness (odds ratio = 10.74, P = 0.006). Among refractory patients, the IA/PE-plus-rituximab group had significantly lower long-term mRS scores than the no-IA/PE group (adjusted P = 0.031). GFAPA-IgG from refractory patients induced CD45 + cell infiltration in mouse brain. Single cell analysis demonstrated activation of complement and inflammatory pathways, with astrocytes adopting a pro inflammatory state. Conclusion: Treatment refractory disease is marked by severe central and peripheral nervous system injury. Convergent clinical and experimental evidence provides a rationale for B cell targeted therapies.

Related

  1. Delayed diagnosis and misdiagnosis of autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: a dual-center retrospective cohort study in China
    Sheng Lin, Yiqian Huang, Chuming Huang +1
    Frontiers in NeurologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefDOAJ
  2. Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Astrocytopathy Mimicking Wernicke's Encephalopathy
    Keishu Murakami, Shoko Yorozu, Takuma Eimoto +1
    Internal MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textNeurologyJ-STAGE
  3. Case report: When encephalitis is not an infection: two cases of autoimmune GFAP astrocytopathy mimicking infectious encephalitis
    Gabriela Trojan, Ngoc Hoang Anh Than, Abisha Senthilkumar +3
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeurologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Teclistamab for treatment-refractory autoimmune diseases: a multicentre case series
    Fredrik N. Albach, Elpida Phithak, Robert Biesen +34
    Annals of the Rheumatic DiseasesPeer-reviewedCC BY10 citedGeneral medicineOpenAlex
  5. Autoimmune-Mediated Hypertriglyceridemia in a Young Male with Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Case Report
    Batya Green, Eran Leitersdorf, Shoshana Shpitzen +7
    Journal of Lipid ResearchPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full text1 citedCardiovascular medicineCrossref
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026treatmentrefractory,
  title = {{Treatment-refractory autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: Clinical features, predictive models, therapy}},
  author = {Shifeng Zhang and Huilu Li and Haiyan Yao and Ting Li and Wendong Lai and Shiyu He and Peihao Lin and Jie Yang and Yaqing Shu and Dayang Hui and Li Huang and Cong Gao and Xiaorong Liu and Youming Long},
  journal = {Neurobiology of Disease},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107653},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107653},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Treatment-refractory autoimmune glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy: Clinical features, predictive models, therapy
AU  - Shifeng Zhang
AU  - Huilu Li
AU  - Haiyan Yao
AU  - Ting Li
AU  - Wendong Lai
AU  - Shiyu He
AU  - Peihao Lin
AU  - Jie Yang
AU  - Yaqing Shu
AU  - Dayang Hui
AU  - Li Huang
AU  - Cong Gao
AU  - Xiaorong Liu
AU  - Youming Long
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Neurobiology of Disease
DO  - 10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107653
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107653
AB  - Background and objectives: A subset of glial fibrillary acidic protein astrocytopathy experiences treatment-refractory disease course, yet the clinical and immunological features defining this subgroup remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Patients were classified as treatment-refractory ( n = 23) or treatment-responsive ( n = 30). Clinical, imaging, and outcomes were compared. For subgroup analyses, refractory patients were divided into three groups: no immunoadsorption/plasma exchange (IA/PE) ( n = 9), IA/PE monotherapy ( n = 4), and IA/PE plus rituximab ( n = 10), with functional outcomes compared across groups. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) from refractory patients was applied to a passive transfer mouse model, and single-cell RNA sequencing was performed to explore underlying pathogenic mechanisms. Results: The treatment-refractory group had higher proportion of the meningoencephalomyelitis phenotype (82.6% vs. 53.3%, P = 0.026) and more frequent disturbances of consciousness (65.2% vs. 30.0%, P = 0.011), paraplegia (78.3% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001), and peripheral nervous system involvement (89.5% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001). Refractory patients had elevated cerebrospinal fluid glial fibrillary acidic protein and neurofilament light chain levels. Refractory patients more frequently exhibited spinal cord lesions involving three or more segments (65.2% vs. 21.4%, P = 0.002). Disability at last follow-up was greater in the refractory group (median modified Rankin Scale score 3 vs. 1, P < 0.0001). Firth penalized regression model identified peripheral nervous system involvement as the independent predictor of treatment refractoriness (odds ratio = 10.74, P = 0.006). Among refractory patients, the IA/PE-plus-rituximab group had significantly lower long-term mRS scores than the no-IA/PE group (adjusted P = 0.031). GFAPA-IgG from refractory patients induced CD45 + cell infiltration in mouse brain. Single cell analysis demonstrated activation of complement and inflammatory pathways, with astrocytes adopting a pro inflammatory state. Conclusion: Treatment refractory disease is marked by severe central and peripheral nervous system injury. Convergent clinical and experimental evidence provides a rationale for B cell targeted therapies.
SN  - 1095-953X
SN  - 0969-9961
ER  -