Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 2 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NCOrthopedic Reviews

Component-specific prognostic signals within a multidimensional classification for periprosthetic joint infection and the impact of repeated surgical episodes: a retrospective cohort study

  1. 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine

Abstract

Background: The PJI-TNM classification provides a multidimensional description of periprosthetic joint infection, but the prognostic contribution of its individual components remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate component-specific associations with infection-related reoperation and determine how repeated surgical episodes within patients influence risk estimates. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 116 hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection surgical episodes in 84 patients treated from April 2016 to February 2026. The outcome was the first unplanned infection-related reoperation after each index operation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were performed, using patient-clustered robust variance estimates to account for repeated episodes. A patient-level sensitivity analysis used the first observed episode per patient. Results: Infection-related reoperation occurred after 42 episodes. Reoperation-free survival was 70.8% at 180 days, 63.1% at 1 year, and 55.1% at 2 years. In the primary clustered model, T2 showed an elevated but imprecise hazard estimate (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 0.89-7.72), whereas T1 did not. The N component showed no clear association with outcome. M2 produced a high estimate but comprised only three episodes from two patients. In the patient-level sensitivity analysis, the T2 hazard ratio was 4.78 (95% confidence interval 1.05-21.81). Conclusion: Prognostic information within PJI-TNM was unevenly distributed across components. Severe soft-tissue compromise represented by T2 showed the most consistent adverse signal, while repeated-episode analyses materially affected precision. Multicentre validation is required.

Related

  1. Association of preoperative D-dimer-to-albumin ratio and prognostic nutritional index with aseptic wound complications and periprosthetic joint infection after primary total knee arthroplasty: a single-center retrospective cohort study
    Zhi-Chao Han, Xiao-Kai Liu, Peng-Yuan Su +7
    BMC Musculoskeletal DisordersPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaDOAJ
  2. Retrospective analysis of LAG3, TIGIT, TIM3 and VISTA immune checkpoints expression in hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection
    Nicole Lind Henriksen, Mats Bue, Christen Ravn +7
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  3. Interest of the multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) as an assessment tool in hospitalized patients in geriatrics
    Thomas Brunet, Marie-Laure Bureau, Arnaud Caupenne +4
    Gériatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie du ViellissementPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text3 citedGeneral biologyGeneral medicineHAL
  4. Preoperative Staphylococcus aureus nasal screening and decolonization for the prevention of periprosthetic joint infection in elective total joint arthroplasty: A single-center retrospective comparative study.
    Virginia Cinelli, Alessandro El Motassime, Giacomo Capece +6
    SICOT-JPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  5. One-Year Infection Eradication and Clinical Outcomes After Completed Two-Stage Revision for Hip and Knee Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Muhindra Rao, Mohd Aizat Azfar Bin Soldin, Maatharasi Balan +1
    CureusPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textInfectious diseaseEurope PMCPMC
BibTeX
@article{kumabe2026componentspecific,
  title = {{Component-specific prognostic signals within a multidimensional classification for periprosthetic joint infection and the impact of repeated surgical episodes: a retrospective cohort study}},
  author = {Yohei Kumabe and Kenichi Sawauchi and Yutaka Matsumiya and Tomoaki Fukui and Shinya Hayashi and Tomoyuki Matsumoto and Ryosuke Kuroda and Keisuke Oe},
  journal = {Orthopedic Reviews},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.52965/001c.172841},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172841},
  note = {CC BY-NC},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Component-specific prognostic signals within a multidimensional classification for periprosthetic joint infection and the impact of repeated surgical episodes: a retrospective cohort study
AU  - Yohei Kumabe
AU  - Kenichi Sawauchi
AU  - Yutaka Matsumiya
AU  - Tomoaki Fukui
AU  - Shinya Hayashi
AU  - Tomoyuki Matsumoto
AU  - Ryosuke Kuroda
AU  - Keisuke Oe
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Orthopedic Reviews
DO  - 10.52965/001c.172841
UR  - https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.172841
AB  - Background: The PJI-TNM classification provides a multidimensional description of periprosthetic joint infection, but the prognostic contribution of its individual components remains uncertain. Objective: To evaluate component-specific associations with infection-related reoperation and determine how repeated surgical episodes within patients influence risk estimates. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 116 hip or knee periprosthetic joint infection surgical episodes in 84 patients treated from April 2016 to February 2026. The outcome was the first unplanned infection-related reoperation after each index operation. Kaplan-Meier and Cox analyses were performed, using patient-clustered robust variance estimates to account for repeated episodes. A patient-level sensitivity analysis used the first observed episode per patient. Results: Infection-related reoperation occurred after 42 episodes. Reoperation-free survival was 70.8% at 180 days, 63.1% at 1 year, and 55.1% at 2 years. In the primary clustered model, T2 showed an elevated but imprecise hazard estimate (hazard ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 0.89-7.72), whereas T1 did not. The N component showed no clear association with outcome. M2 produced a high estimate but comprised only three episodes from two patients. In the patient-level sensitivity analysis, the T2 hazard ratio was 4.78 (95% confidence interval 1.05-21.81). Conclusion: Prognostic information within PJI-TNM was unevenly distributed across components. Severe soft-tissue compromise represented by T2 showed the most consistent adverse signal, while repeated-episode analyses materially affected precision. Multicentre validation is required.
SN  - 2035-8237
SN  - 2035-8164
ER  -