Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 43 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees

Abstract

In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group G, which may be prohibitively expensive when G is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show that, with probability at least 1−δ, gradient descent (GD) on the resulting sparsely augmented objective returns an ε-stationary point of the fully augmented objective using 𝒪((log |G|+log(1/δ))/ε2) group-transformation-oracle queries. By comparison, standard group stochastic gradient descent (group-SGD), which samples a fresh transformation at every iteration, uses 𝒪(1/ε4) transformation queries. Therefore, gradient descent with fixed sparse augmentation requires fewer transformation queries than both GD applied to the fully augmented objective and group-SGD. Our proof techniques, which may be of independent interest, establish a uniform approximation of the full group-averaged gradient field by a random group average using spectral properties of group-induced operators and tools from representation theory.

Related

  1. Quasi-Static Fault-Tolerant Feedback Control of a Quadrotor under Rotor Failure with Provable Safety Guarantees
    Mohamed Al Lawati, Adeel Akhtar
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textDynamical systemsOptimisation & controlarXiv
  2. Provable Guarantees and Efficient Learning of Structural Equation Models with Latent Confounders
    Weijian Yu, Jean Honorio
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  3. Adapt or Forget: Provable Tradeoffs Between Adam and SGD in Nonstationary Optimization
    Sharan Sahu, Abir Sarkar, Cameron J. Hogan +1
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. A note on the convergence guarantees of RLT-based algorithms for polynomial optimization
    Alejandro Barros-González, Julio González-Díaz, Brais González-Rodríguez +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  5. From Consensus-Based Optimization to Particle Swarm Optimization: Convergence Guarantees under Drift-Diffusion Coupling
    Franca Hoffmann, Dohyeon Kim, Ritvik Teegavarapu
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingOptimisation & controlarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{tahmasebi2026sparse,
  title = {{Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees}},
  author = {Behrooz Tahmasebi and Melanie Weber},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.08133},
  eprint = {2609.08133},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08133},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sparse Data Augmentation for Optimization with Provable Guarantees
AU  - Behrooz Tahmasebi
AU  - Melanie Weber
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/16
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.08133
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.08133
AB  - In nonconvex optimization problems arising in geometric machine learning, data augmentation is commonly used to promote invariance by averaging empirical losses over transformations of the data. Computing the fully augmented objective, however, requires access to every element of the transformation group G, which may be prohibitively expensive when G is large or accessible only through sampling. We study whether full augmentation can instead be approximated using a small, fixed sample of transformations acquired before optimization and reused thereafter. Under suitable regularity conditions, we show that, with probability at least 1−δ, gradient descent (GD) on the resulting sparsely augmented objective returns an ε-stationary point of the fully augmented objective using 𝒪((log |G|+log(1/δ))/ε^2) group-transformation-oracle queries. By comparison, standard group stochastic gradient descent (group-SGD), which samples a fresh transformation at every iteration, uses 𝒪(1/ε^4) transformation queries. Therefore, gradient descent with fixed sparse augmentation requires fewer transformation queries than both GD applied to the fully augmented objective and group-SGD. Our proof techniques, which may be of independent interest, establish a uniform approximation of the full group-averaged gradient field by a random group average using spectral properties of group-induced operators and tools from representation theory.
ER  -