Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 13 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Sharp Characterization of Bias in Post-Bandit Inference

Abstract

Bandit algorithms generate data for downstream inference, but adaptive sampling biases post-bandit sample means. We analyze this bias for stable index algorithms, including UCB1 and its generalizations, and derive sharp leading-order expressions for the sample-mean bias and expected Z-statistic, in bandit experiments of fixed horizon T. Our characterization reveals the algorithmic origin of bias through a key index-function-dependent quantity, which we term effective exploration rate. For example, under UCB1, the effective exploration rate is of order √(log T), and the standardized bias of any arm (that is not uniquely optimal) decays at the extremely slow rate 1/√(log T). We also show how the choice of the index function affects both regret and bias, which reveals a regret-bias trade-off: more exploratory algorithm reduces bias but increases regret. We further show how bias most severely distorts confidence intervals and hypothesis tests when the tested arm is one of the tied-optimal arms. Our sharp characterization for bias uses a novel empirical fluid approximation of the algorithm's sampling dynamics, which may be of independent interest.

Related

  1. Exploration strategies for Gaussian process bandit optimization with inference regret guarantees
    Hwanwoo Kim, Jungwoo Hong, Kyungjae Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlStatisticsarXiv
  2. Bandit Process Inference for Streaming Functional Data
    Ziyu Zhang, Yan Wang, Jingqi Yan +4
    AxiomsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0StatisticsCrossref
  3. PAC Learning with Bandit Feedback: Sharp Sample Complexity in the Realizable Setting
    Steve Hanneke, Qinglin Meng, Shay Moran +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Sharp Bounds on the Winner's Bias under Independent and Nonnegatively Correlated Noise
    Ivan Viakhirev, Kirill Borodin, Grach Mkrtchian
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Bias-robust causal inference for panel data
    Angelos Alexopoulos
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{wang2026sharp,
  title = {{Sharp Characterization of Bias in Post-Bandit Inference}},
  author = {Lisu Wang and Yilun Chen and Jiaqi Lu},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.01069},
  eprint = {2608.01069},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01069},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Sharp Characterization of Bias in Post-Bandit Inference
AU  - Lisu Wang
AU  - Yilun Chen
AU  - Jiaqi Lu
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/22
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.01069
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.01069
AB  - Bandit algorithms generate data for downstream inference, but adaptive sampling biases post-bandit sample means. We analyze this bias for stable index algorithms, including UCB1 and its generalizations, and derive sharp leading-order expressions for the sample-mean bias and expected Z-statistic, in bandit experiments of fixed horizon T. Our characterization reveals the algorithmic origin of bias through a key index-function-dependent quantity, which we term effective exploration rate. For example, under UCB1, the effective exploration rate is of order √(log T), and the standardized bias of any arm (that is not uniquely optimal) decays at the extremely slow rate 1/√(log T). We also show how the choice of the index function affects both regret and bias, which reveals a regret-bias trade-off: more exploratory algorithm reduces bias but increases regret. We further show how bias most severely distorts confidence intervals and hypothesis tests when the tested arm is one of the tied-optimal arms. Our sharp characterization for bias uses a novel empirical fluid approximation of the algorithm's sampling dynamics, which may be of independent interest.
ER  -