Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
194,161 studies31 sourcesUpdated 19 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

A systematic comparison of hard- and soft-constrained physics-informed molecular machine learning with the Clapeyron equation

Abstract

In molecular machine learning (ML), significant progress has been made on integrating fundamental thermodynamic relations into ML models. Such physics-informed approaches can be categorized as hard-constrained, where the thermodynamic relations are embedded in the model architecture, and soft-constrained, where relations are included in the training loss. While both approaches have been applied to various property prediction tasks, a systematic comparison on experimental data is lacking. We herein compare hard- and soft-constrained approaches on a numerically challenging case study: the prediction of vapor pressure, saturated liquid and vapor molar volumes, and enthalpy of vaporization as functions of temperature for single-species vapor-liquid equilibrium, related by the exact Clapeyron equation. Furthermore, soft-constrained approaches in molecular ML typically balance data and physics losses with a fixed weighting factor, requiring careful tuning. To overcome this, we investigate the augmented Lagrangian method (ALM), well established in constrained optimization. We find that for the soft-constrained approach, using the ALM improves prediction performance in terms of constraint satisfaction by factor 2 and reduces training epochs compared to using a fixed penalty by 30%. Hence, in the soft-constrained approach, the use of the ALM is always recommended. The hard-constrained approach, which entails additional architectural design choices, can reach on par accuracy with the soft-constrained approach, at even higher thermodynamic consistency, reaching 12 orders of magnitude closer approximation of the Clapeyron equation. Overall, the hard-constrained approach is most promising when thermodynamic consistency is critical, yet requires tailoring the ML model architecture to the respective thermodynamic relation.

Related

  1. Thermodynamically Constrained Deep Learning for Hydrogen Sorption Prediction: Overcoming Classical Isotherm Generalization Failure through Physics-Informed Cross-Lithology Transferability
    Mohammad Nooraiepour, Mohammad Masoudi, Zezhang Song +1
    ACS OmegaPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textMaterials & polymersCrossref
  2. Interfacial Mechanisms of Reactive Dye Adsorption on a Waste-Cotton Derived PVA/TiO2/Cellulose Biofilm: A Molecular Dynamics and Physics-Informed Predictive Framework
    Md Shajjad Khan Faisal, Tinon Turja Majumder, Kazi Sirajul Islam +4
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  3. Systematic Evaluation of Mixture-Design for Multi-Oxide Magnesium Aluminosilicate Glass Development: Model Comparison, Modifier Interactions, and Predictive Limitations
    Muawia Dafir, Holger Cebulla, Martin Kilo
    ChemRxivPreprintLicence not statedGeneral chemistryChemRxiv
  4. Electron-Density-Informed Molecular Property Prediction Using Surrogate Functionals
    Manuel V. Klockow, Simon Wagner, Roman Remme +2
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textPhysical chemistryarXiv
  5. MIRRA: Fast, High-Fidelity Molecular Generation with Chemistry-Informed Discrete Flow Matching
    Ge Sun, Juan J. de Pablo
    arXivPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textPhysical chemistryComputational physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{pavsek2026systematic,
  title = {{A systematic comparison of hard- and soft-constrained physics-informed molecular machine learning with the Clapeyron equation}},
  author = {Jan Pavšek and Jan G. Rittig and Alexander Mitsos},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = sep,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.36947},
  eprint = {2609.36947},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36947},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - A systematic comparison of hard- and soft-constrained physics-informed molecular machine learning with the Clapeyron equation
AU  - Jan Pavšek
AU  - Jan G. Rittig
AU  - Alexander Mitsos
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/09/29
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.36947
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36947
AB  - In molecular machine learning (ML), significant progress has been made on integrating fundamental thermodynamic relations into ML models. Such physics-informed approaches can be categorized as hard-constrained, where the thermodynamic relations are embedded in the model architecture, and soft-constrained, where relations are included in the training loss. While both approaches have been applied to various property prediction tasks, a systematic comparison on experimental data is lacking. We herein compare hard- and soft-constrained approaches on a numerically challenging case study: the prediction of vapor pressure, saturated liquid and vapor molar volumes, and enthalpy of vaporization as functions of temperature for single-species vapor-liquid equilibrium, related by the exact Clapeyron equation. Furthermore, soft-constrained approaches in molecular ML typically balance data and physics losses with a fixed weighting factor, requiring careful tuning. To overcome this, we investigate the augmented Lagrangian method (ALM), well established in constrained optimization. We find that for the soft-constrained approach, using the ALM improves prediction performance in terms of constraint satisfaction by factor 2 and reduces training epochs compared to using a fixed penalty by 30%. Hence, in the soft-constrained approach, the use of the ALM is always recommended. The hard-constrained approach, which entails additional architectural design choices, can reach on par accuracy with the soft-constrained approach, at even higher thermodynamic consistency, reaching 12 orders of magnitude closer approximation of the Clapeyron equation. Overall, the hard-constrained approach is most promising when thermodynamic consistency is critical, yet requires tailoring the ML model architecture to the respective thermodynamic relation.
ER  -