Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 58 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of applied clinical medical physics

Image quality robustness of HyperSight-enabled versus conventional iterative cone-beam CT across patient size and imaging geometry.

  1. 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Abstract

Background

Recent advances in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) have led to the development of next-generation CBCT systems with enhanced image quality and quantitative imaging capabilities. These advances are particularly relevant in the context adaptive radiation therapy, where improved soft tissue visualization and Hounsfield unit (HU) stability are increasingly important for target localization and CBCT-based dose calculation.Purpose

To determine how image quality and HU stability change with increasing phantom size, non-cylindrical geometries, and exposure level, and compare the robustness of Acuros-based HyperSight-enabled iterative CBCT (HS-iCBCT) and conventional iterative CBCT on a TrueBeam (TB-iCBCT) under these conditions.Methods

The CatPhan® 604 phantom, combined with custom annular extensions, was used to simulate increasing patient size and non-cylindrical imaging geometries. Three configurations (no annulus, small annulus, and large annulus) were imaged across a range of exposure levels (mAs) using HS-iCBCT and TB-iCBCT. Image evaluation metrics included noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast visibility (LCV), image uniformity, spatial resolution, and Hounsfield unit (HU) constancy.Results

For the no-annulus configuration, image quality was comparable between systems, with slightly lower noise observed for TB-iCBCT. With increasing phantom size through the added annuli, TB-iCBCT exhibited substantial degradation in noise, contrast, and uniformity, whereas HS-iCBCT maintained more consistent performance. Spatial resolution was primarily dependent on field of view and was similar between systems, with smaller fields of view provided improved spatial resolution. HU constancy degraded with increasing phantom size and material density for both systems but remained substantially more stable for HS-iCBCT.Conclusions

HS-iCBCT demonstrated improved robustness to patient size and imaging geometry, providing superior image quality and HU stability compared to TB-iCBCT. These improvements may support potential lower-dose imaging and more reliable performance in larger patients and non-cylindrical imaging geometries commonly encountered in clinical radiotherapy.

Related

  1. Robustness of Magic and the Directed Geometry of State Conversion
    Satoshi Kanno, Yoshi-aki Shimada
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textAlgebra & number theoryQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  2. Adaptive Rotation for iSOMA: Geometry, Benchmarking, and Noise Robustness in Variational Quantum Objectives
    Vojtěch Novák, Ivan Zelinka
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  3. A low-temperature entropy source for on-chip true random number generation: universal robustness beyond device quality
    Y. Q. Chai, M. Y. Wang, X. N. Feng +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textApplied physics & instrumentationQuantum physics & quantum informationarXiv
  4. Non-iterative nonlinear cross-correlation imaging for Fresnel incoherent correlation holography
    Qi Li, Xiaoyu Fan, Chengyuan Zhang +6
    Optics ExpressPeer-reviewedPublisher termsAtomic, molecular & optical physicsCrossref
  5. An iterative method bridging DFT, disorder averaging, and experiment in intercalated materials: application to Au-intercalated graphene
    Poonam Kumari, Alberto Zobelli, Igor de Melo Froldi +3
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral physicsHAL
BibTeX
@article{nelson2026image,
  title = {{Image quality robustness of HyperSight-enabled versus conventional iterative cone-beam CT across patient size and imaging geometry.}},
  author = {Nicholas Nelson and Sorour Hosseini and Geoff Nelson and Thomas Martin and Bradley Nordin and Jessica Huang and Hui Zhao},
  journal = {Journal of applied clinical medical physics},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1002/acm2.70874},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900568},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Image quality robustness of HyperSight-enabled versus conventional iterative cone-beam CT across patient size and imaging geometry.
AU  - Nicholas Nelson
AU  - Sorour Hosseini
AU  - Geoff Nelson
AU  - Thomas Martin
AU  - Bradley Nordin
AU  - Jessica Huang
AU  - Hui Zhao
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/30
JO  - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
DO  - 10.1002/acm2.70874
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42900568
AB  - Background  Recent advances in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) have led to the development of next-generation CBCT systems with enhanced image quality and quantitative imaging capabilities. These advances are particularly relevant in the context adaptive radiation therapy, where improved soft tissue visualization and Hounsfield unit (HU) stability are increasingly important for target localization and CBCT-based dose calculation.Purpose  To determine how image quality and HU stability change with increasing phantom size, non-cylindrical geometries, and exposure level, and compare the robustness of Acuros-based HyperSight-enabled iterative CBCT (HS-iCBCT) and conventional iterative CBCT on a TrueBeam (TB-iCBCT) under these conditions.Methods  The CatPhan® 604 phantom, combined with custom annular extensions, was used to simulate increasing patient size and non-cylindrical imaging geometries. Three configurations (no annulus, small annulus, and large annulus) were imaged across a range of exposure levels (mAs) using HS-iCBCT and TB-iCBCT. Image evaluation metrics included noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), low-contrast visibility (LCV), image uniformity, spatial resolution, and Hounsfield unit (HU) constancy.Results  For the no-annulus configuration, image quality was comparable between systems, with slightly lower noise observed for TB-iCBCT. With increasing phantom size through the added annuli, TB-iCBCT exhibited substantial degradation in noise, contrast, and uniformity, whereas HS-iCBCT maintained more consistent performance. Spatial resolution was primarily dependent on field of view and was similar between systems, with smaller fields of view provided improved spatial resolution. HU constancy degraded with increasing phantom size and material density for both systems but remained substantially more stable for HS-iCBCT.Conclusions  HS-iCBCT demonstrated improved robustness to patient size and imaging geometry, providing superior image quality and HU stability compared to TB-iCBCT. These improvements may support potential lower-dose imaging and more reliable performance in larger patients and non-cylindrical imaging geometries commonly encountered in clinical radiotherapy.
SN  - 1526-9914
ER  -