Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
189,280 studies31 sourcesUpdated 41 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0PLOS One

Endoscopic necrosectomy of infected pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis using two types of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents

5 affiliations
  1. 1Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Westlake University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  2. 2Key Laboratory of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine for Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  3. 3Hangzhou Institute of Digestive Diseases, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  4. 4Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
  5. 5Department of Gastroenterology, Olive View-UCLA Medical Center and David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, United States of America

Abstract

Background: Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement enables transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) with secure anchoring and provides endoscopic access for subsequent necrosectomy. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two commercially available LAMS designs (Hot-Axios vs. Micro-Tech) in patients with infected WON. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with infected WON who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided LAMS placement followed by endoscopic debridement at our center between August 2020 and June 2025. Results: Thirty-one patients were included (Hot-Axios, n = 21; Micro-Tech, n = 10). The overall necrosectomy success rate was 80.65% (25/31). Necrosectomy success was numerically higher with Hot-Axios than with Micro-Tech (85.71% vs. 70.00%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.358). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P = 0.007); bleeding occurred more frequently in the Hot-Axios group (33.33% vs. 0%), whereas stent migration was more common in the Micro-Tech group (0% vs. 20.00%). Conclusions: In conclusion, endoscopic necrosectomy for infected WON using LAMS is feasible and effective. Hot-Axios may provide more secure fixation and better resistance to migration; however, it may carry a higher risk of bleeding.

Related

  1. Sweet relief-endoscopic ultrasound-guided jejunojejunostomy using a lumen-apposing metal stent for candy cane syndrome.
    Hinrich Fehrendt, Hauke Hamel, Franziska Halfmann +4
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Emphysematous gastritis with extensive portal venous gas and endoscopic mucosal necrosis: gastric preservation despite an alarming presentation.
    Ettore Caruso, Carmine Gabriele, Denise Gambardella +15
    Journal of surgical case reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Serial Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices in Acute Pancreatitis: Temporal Associations with Disease Severity, Pancreatic Necrosis, and Prolonged Hospitalization—A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Şaheste Şen, Engin Altıntaş, Ebru Çetin Kenan +1
    Journal of Clinical MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Surgery & anaesthesiaCrossref
  4. Machine learning-supported identification of necrosis in colorectal and pancreatic cancer spheroids
    Miguel Martínez Lozano, Heinz D. Wanzenboeck, Sonia Prado-López
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyPLOS
  5. Endoscopic management of pancreatic duct stones and stricture in chronic pancreatitis using a fully covered self-expandable metal stent.
    Nan Zeng, Beibei Li, Jingbo Yang
    EndoscopyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{ding2026endoscopic,
  title = {{Endoscopic necrosectomy of infected pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis using two types of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents}},
  author = {Cong Ding and Hui Wang and Yifeng Zhou and Jing Yang and Xia Wang and Goufan Shen and Xiaofeng Zhang and Richard Hu and Jianfeng Yang},
  journal = {PLOS One},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0361859},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361859},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Endoscopic necrosectomy of infected pancreatic Walled-Off Necrosis using two types of Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents
AU  - Cong Ding
AU  - Hui Wang
AU  - Yifeng Zhou
AU  - Jing Yang
AU  - Xia Wang
AU  - Goufan Shen
AU  - Xiaofeng Zhang
AU  - Richard Hu
AU  - Jianfeng Yang
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - PLOS One
DO  - 10.1371/journal.pone.0361859
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361859
AB  - Background: Lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) placement enables transmural drainage of walled-off necrosis (WON) with secure anchoring and provides endoscopic access for subsequent necrosectomy. This study compared the efficacy and safety of two commercially available LAMS designs (Hot-Axios vs. Micro-Tech) in patients with infected WON. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with infected WON who underwent endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided LAMS placement followed by endoscopic debridement at our center between August 2020 and June 2025. Results: Thirty-one patients were included (Hot-Axios, n = 21; Micro-Tech, n = 10). The overall necrosectomy success rate was 80.65% (25/31). Necrosectomy success was numerically higher with Hot-Axios than with Micro-Tech (85.71% vs. 70.00%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.358). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups (P = 0.007); bleeding occurred more frequently in the Hot-Axios group (33.33% vs. 0%), whereas stent migration was more common in the Micro-Tech group (0% vs. 20.00%). Conclusions: In conclusion, endoscopic necrosectomy for infected WON using LAMS is feasible and effective. Hot-Axios may provide more secure fixation and better resistance to migration; however, it may carry a higher risk of bleeding.
SN  - 1932-6203
ER  -