Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

PanelGP: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Asset-Return Panels

Abstract

We develop PanelGP, a conditional factor model for large panels of stock returns in which firm characteristics determine the factor loadings and economic conditions determine the expected factors. Both relations are estimated nonparametrically with Gaussian-process priors. The kernel choice nests instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA) as well as smooth nonlinear maps. Asset-specific loading innovations and common factor innovations separate idiosyncratic from systematic risk, so one estimated model forecasts both expected returns and their covariance matrix. Estimation uses sparse variational inference with a joint posterior over loadings and factors. Because each predicted return is bilinear in a Gaussian state, the predictive covariance matrix and the cumulants of any portfolio have closed forms. In simulations, the estimator recovers the nonlinear maps and the variance parameters. For S&P 500 constituents over 1995-2024, nonlinear loadings rank stocks better than affine loadings and improve the Gaussian log score. Relative to IPCA, the resulting portfolios have higher Sharpe ratios, also net of trading costs, and the minimum-variance portfolio has lower volatility. The predicted variances rank stocks and months by risk but are too compressed.

Related

  1. ON A PROBABILISTIC ITERATED FACTOR METHOD
    Theophilus Agama
    HALPreprintCC BY-ND 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  2. Regularity of the Value Function in Multi-Asset Portfolio Selection with Proportional Transaction Costs
    Xinfu Chen, Shuaijie Qian
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Specification LASSO and a Flexible Characteristics-Based Asset Pricing Model
    Chaohua Dong, Shuyi Ge, Shaoran Li +1
    arXivPreprintCC0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Surplus Utility and Intertemporal Asset Pricing
    Hyeon Park
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.01 citedGeneral mathematicsCrossref
  5. A Differential-Geometric Framework for Risk-Optimal Asset Reallocation
    Georgios Leventidis, Evangelos Melas
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textGeometry & topologyarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{ruglioni2026panelgp,
  title = {{PanelGP: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Asset-Return Panels}},
  author = {Andrea Ruglioni and Damir Filipovic},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.04040},
  eprint = {2611.04040},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04040},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - PanelGP: A Probabilistic Factor Model for Asset-Return Panels
AU  - Andrea Ruglioni
AU  - Damir Filipovic
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/02
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.04040
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.04040
AB  - We develop PanelGP, a conditional factor model for large panels of stock returns in which firm characteristics determine the factor loadings and economic conditions determine the expected factors. Both relations are estimated nonparametrically with Gaussian-process priors. The kernel choice nests instrumented principal component analysis (IPCA) as well as smooth nonlinear maps. Asset-specific loading innovations and common factor innovations separate idiosyncratic from systematic risk, so one estimated model forecasts both expected returns and their covariance matrix. Estimation uses sparse variational inference with a joint posterior over loadings and factors. Because each predicted return is bilinear in a Gaussian state, the predictive covariance matrix and the cumulants of any portfolio have closed forms. In simulations, the estimator recovers the nonlinear maps and the variance parameters. For S&P 500 constituents over 1995-2024, nonlinear loadings rank stocks better than affine loadings and improve the Gaussian log score. Relative to IPCA, the resulting portfolios have higher Sharpe ratios, also net of trading costs, and the minimum-variance portfolio has lower volatility. The predicted variances rank stocks and months by risk but are too compressed.
ER  -