Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 52 min ago
PreprintCC BY 4.0arXiv

Black Hole Love Numbers with Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Abstract

We develop and validate a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for computing the tidal Love numbers of black holes directly from their perturbation equations. We consider static perturbations of the Kerr black hole, whose exact hypergeometric solutions provide a controlled benchmark for both the numerical solver and the extraction of the physical response. The framework combines exact enforcement of the horizon boundary conditions with an H2-Sobolev loss that incorporates derivatives of the differential-equation residual. The Love number is then obtained by extracting the asymptotic coefficients of the learned solution, without using the analytic connection formula. Across the tested scalar, vector, and tensor perturbations, the method recovers the finite dissipative response with relative errors below 10−5. Controlled comparisons show that the higher-derivative loss terms improve solution accuracy by orders of magnitude, while independent tests of the extraction procedure distinguish solver errors from errors in recovering the response coefficients. The conservative response, which vanishes analytically, is constrained by the numerical error floor. These results demonstrate that PINNs can accurately compute black-hole tidal response and establish a validated framework for future extensions to frequency-dependent and non-separable perturbation problems.

Related

  1. Lazy training of quantum physics informed neural networks
    Anderson Melchor Hernandez, Giacomo De Palma
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textMathematical physicsProbabilityarXiv
  2. AKAPINN: Adaptive Kolmogorov-Arnold Physics-Informed Neural Networks for approximating solutions to quasilinear partial differential equations
    B. Veena S. N. Rao
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  3. Solving Fredholm Integral Equations with Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Single-and double-network approaches
    Mathieu Fabre, Laurence Grammont, Youcef Mammeri
    HALPreprintCC BY-NC-SA 4.0Full textGeneral mathematicsHAL
  4. Error Estimates in Physics-Informed Neural Networks to Heat-Wave Fluid-Structure Interactive System
    Pelin G. Geredeli, Mohammad Mahabubur Rahman, Deepanshu Verma
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
  5. Lie Symmetry-Guided Adaptive Sampling for Physics-Informed Neural Networks
    Runze Zhao
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textNumerical analysis & scientific computingarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{rodriguez2026black,
  title = {{Black Hole Love Numbers with Physics-Informed Neural Networks}},
  author = {Maria J. Rodriguez and Luis Fernando Temoche and Pavlos Protopapas},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2611.02084},
  eprint = {2611.02084},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02084},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Black Hole Love Numbers with Physics-Informed Neural Networks
AU  - Maria J. Rodriguez
AU  - Luis Fernando Temoche
AU  - Pavlos Protopapas
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/01
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2611.02084
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2611.02084
AB  - We develop and validate a physics-informed neural network (PINN) framework for computing the tidal Love numbers of black holes directly from their perturbation equations. We consider static perturbations of the Kerr black hole, whose exact hypergeometric solutions provide a controlled benchmark for both the numerical solver and the extraction of the physical response. The framework combines exact enforcement of the horizon boundary conditions with an H^2-Sobolev loss that incorporates derivatives of the differential-equation residual. The Love number is then obtained by extracting the asymptotic coefficients of the learned solution, without using the analytic connection formula. Across the tested scalar, vector, and tensor perturbations, the method recovers the finite dissipative response with relative errors below 10^−5. Controlled comparisons show that the higher-derivative loss terms improve solution accuracy by orders of magnitude, while independent tests of the extraction procedure distinguish solver errors from errors in recovering the response coefficients. The conservative response, which vanishes analytically, is constrained by the numerical error floor. These results demonstrate that PINNs can accurately compute black-hole tidal response and establish a validated framework for future extensions to frequency-dependent and non-separable perturbation problems.
ER  -