Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BYJournal of gastrointestinal cancer

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Staging and Classification Systems: An Updated Narrative Review.

  1. 1Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Ginecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, University Hospital G.B. Rossi, Verona, 37134, Italy.
  2. 2Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Ginecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona, University Hospital G.B. Rossi, Verona, 37134, Italy. [email protected].
  3. 3Division of General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Ginecology and Pediatrics, University of Verona Medical School, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Piazzale L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona, 37134, Italy. [email protected].

Abstract

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive primary liver malignancy characterized by increasing incdence, late diagnosis, and marked biological heterogeneity. This review summarizes ICC staging and classification systems, highlighting their clinical applications, strengths, limitations, and future development.Methods

Anatomical, histopathological, imaging-based, and molecular classifications were examined, with particular attention to prognostic discrimination, surgical planning, and treatment selection.Results

The AJCC eighth-edition TNM system remains the international standard and improves prognostic stratification through assessment of tumor size and number, vascular invasion, peritoneal perforation, extrahepatic extension, nodal involvement, and distant metastases. However, TNM staging does not fully capture biological heterogeneity. Macroscopic growth patterns and the World Health Organization distinction between large duct-type and small duct-type ICC provide complementary prognostic and surgical information. Institutional and morphology-based systems may refine postoperative risk assessment but have limited generalizability. Molecular profiling identifies clinically relevant subgroups characterized by FGFR2 fusions, IDH1/2 mutations, BAP1 and ARID1A alterations, or KRAS and TP53 mutations, with therapeutic implications.Conclusion

Contemporary ICC assessment should combine TNM stage with morphological, pathological, and molecular features. Future multidimensional frameworks incorporating tumor biology, treatment response, and circulating biomarkers may improve prognostication and personalized management, provided that international validation, accessibility, and clinical usability are maintained.

Related

  1. Number of examined lymph nodes and overall survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study suggesting a staging benefit
    Xuchang He, Wenhui An, Yangwei Chen +3
    Frontiers in oncologyPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textOncologyEurope PMC
  2. OLFM4 promotes intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progression through a PKM2-glycolysis-histone lactylation feedback loop.
    Shuochen Liu, Kai Cao, Changan Chen +11
    International journal of biological sciencesPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Same organ, divergent immunity: T-cell exhaustion versus stromal exclusion in hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    YanXi Chen, Tao Peng, Hao Nie +1
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textOncologyCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  4. Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: spatial immune ecosystems, metabolic remodeling, and immunotherapeutic implications
    Yanan Yan, Tianhao Teng, Xinying Luo +2
    Frontiers in ImmunologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textSurgery & anaesthesiaCrossrefEurope PMCPMC
  5. Durable response to vebreltinib in heavily pretreated MET-amplified intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a case report.
    Yingying Hang, Lu Bai, Hsiquan Hsu +7
    The oncologistPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{marchese2026intrahepatic,
  title = {{Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Staging and Classification Systems: An Updated Narrative Review.}},
  author = {Andrea Marchese and Simone Conci and Laura Alaimo and Edoardo Poletto and Tommaso Campagnaro and Mario De Bellis and Andrea Ruzzenente},
  journal = {Journal of gastrointestinal cancer},
  year = {2026},
  month = nov,
  doi = {10.1007/s12029-026-01594-9},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972179},
  note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Staging and Classification Systems: An Updated Narrative Review.
AU  - Andrea Marchese
AU  - Simone Conci
AU  - Laura Alaimo
AU  - Edoardo Poletto
AU  - Tommaso Campagnaro
AU  - Mario De Bellis
AU  - Andrea Ruzzenente
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/11/03
JO  - Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
DO  - 10.1007/s12029-026-01594-9
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42972179
AB  - Background  Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive primary liver malignancy characterized by increasing incdence, late diagnosis, and marked biological heterogeneity. This review summarizes ICC staging and classification systems, highlighting their clinical applications, strengths, limitations, and future development.Methods  Anatomical, histopathological, imaging-based, and molecular classifications were examined, with particular attention to prognostic discrimination, surgical planning, and treatment selection.Results  The AJCC eighth-edition TNM system remains the international standard and improves prognostic stratification through assessment of tumor size and number, vascular invasion, peritoneal perforation, extrahepatic extension, nodal involvement, and distant metastases. However, TNM staging does not fully capture biological heterogeneity. Macroscopic growth patterns and the World Health Organization distinction between large duct-type and small duct-type ICC provide complementary prognostic and surgical information. Institutional and morphology-based systems may refine postoperative risk assessment but have limited generalizability. Molecular profiling identifies clinically relevant subgroups characterized by FGFR2 fusions, IDH1/2 mutations, BAP1 and ARID1A alterations, or KRAS and TP53 mutations, with therapeutic implications.Conclusion  Contemporary ICC assessment should combine TNM stage with morphological, pathological, and molecular features. Future multidimensional frameworks incorporating tumor biology, treatment response, and circulating biomarkers may improve prognostication and personalized management, provided that international validation, accessibility, and clinical usability are maintained.
SN  - 1941-6628
SN  - 1941-6636
ER  -