Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
178,970 studies31 sourcesUpdated 22 min ago
PreprintarXiv licencearXiv

Conformal Uncertainty Quantification Guarantees for Neural Operators

Abstract

Neural operators provide fast surrogate models for approximating operators between function spaces, but their predictions often lack uncertainty quantification. We develop a split conformal framework to guarantee that a calibrated pointwise band around the neural operator output contains the true solution on at least a 1−γ fraction of the evaluation domain, with probability at least 1−α over test and calibration inputs, where α,γ∈(0,1). Our method reduces a normalized residual field to its spatial (1−γ)-quantile and computes a scaling factor using a held-out calibration dataset. We prove marginal coverage guarantees for measurable residual fields defined on arbitrary probability spaces, covering both continuum domains and fixed discretizations. Under mild assumptions on the data distribution, we show that the coverage conditional on the calibration set follows a Beta distribution, which we verify with numerical experiments on Darcy flow and Navier--Stokes equations, where our calibration yields bands consistently tighter than existing corrections while retaining the target coverage.

Related

  1. Regime-Aware Conformal Uncertainty Quantification for Irregular ADS-B Trajectories in Terminal Airspace
    Chuyang Yang, Chenyu Huang, Haoruo Fu
    MathematicsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0General mathematicsCrossref
  2. A Unified Perspective on Conformal Prediction and Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization for Uncertainty Quantification
    Kehan Long, Yiqi Zhao, Pol Mestres +3
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textOptimisation & controlarXiv
  3. Multi-Task Learning of Conditional Mean Operators: applications to dynamical systems and uncertainty quantification
    Sami Chemlal, Thibaut Germain, Rémi Flamary +2
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
  4. Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification on Simplicial Complexes with Conformalized Simplicial Neural Networks
    Lekun Wang, Jaidev Goel, Yulia R. Gel +1
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textStatisticsarXiv
  5. Physics-informed random neural architectures on compact boundaryless multiply connected manifolds for random-operator models in machine learning and uncertainty quantification
    Christian Soize
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textStatisticsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{stent2026conformal,
  title = {{Conformal Uncertainty Quantification Guarantees for Neural Operators}},
  author = {Tom Stent and Nicolas Boullé},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2608.28515},
  eprint = {2608.28515},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28515},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Conformal Uncertainty Quantification Guarantees for Neural Operators
AU  - Tom Stent
AU  - Nicolas Boullé
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/28
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2608.28515
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.28515
AB  - Neural operators provide fast surrogate models for approximating operators between function spaces, but their predictions often lack uncertainty quantification. We develop a split conformal framework to guarantee that a calibrated pointwise band around the neural operator output contains the true solution on at least a 1−γ fraction of the evaluation domain, with probability at least 1−α over test and calibration inputs, where α,γ∈(0,1). Our method reduces a normalized residual field to its spatial (1−γ)-quantile and computes a scaling factor using a held-out calibration dataset. We prove marginal coverage guarantees for measurable residual fields defined on arbitrary probability spaces, covering both continuum domains and fixed discretizations. Under mild assumptions on the data distribution, we show that the coverage conditional on the calibration set follows a Beta distribution, which we verify with numerical experiments on Darcy flow and Navier--Stokes equations, where our calibration yields bands consistently tighter than existing corrections while retaining the target coverage.
ER  -