The Computational Value of Sensory-Aligned Receptive Fields Depends on Neuronal Expressivity
Abstract
Biological sensory neurons have selective receptive fields organized along meaningful stimulus coordinates, such as frequency, motion direction, or retinotopic position. Such structure may arise from efficient coding and biological constraints on activity, connectivity, and wiring, as computational studies of simple neurons have shown across modalities. This raises a question: do structured receptive fields confer a computational advantage beyond resource efficiency itself, and does this advantage persist when individual neurons are highly expressive? We address this question in recurrent networks of Expressive Leaky Memory neurons, where we can independently vary neuronal complexity and the organization of feed-forward receptive fields. Across auditory and event-based visual classification tasks, receptive fields aligned with a task-relevant sensory coordinate improve test accuracy relative to budget-matched random receptive fields. This advantage disappears when sensory coordinates are scrambled, or when receptive fields follow task-irrelevant coordinates, showing that the benefit comes from alignment with task geometry rather than restricted connectivity alone. Increasing neuronal complexity reduces the performance advantage of structured receptive fields. Finally, generic synaptic sparsity regularization induces input selectivity and partially recovers performance, but remains substantially below explicitly structured receptive fields, suggesting that sparsity alone is insufficient to recover the full computational benefit of task-aligned receptive fields. Together, our results show that appropriate receptive fields can serve as a computational prior beyond sparsity itself, and that their value depends on the computational expressivity of individual neurons.
Related
- A recurrent neuronal model for the effect of predictions on sensory processes
- Impact of ethanol on odor detection thresholds relevant to No- and Low-Alcohol (NoLo) wines: a combined sensory and computational approach in simplified static hydroalcoholic model wine
- Variabilities in the shapes of the receptive fields of simple cells in mice
- Speech Categorization Consistency Is Robustly Associated With Receptive Oral Language Performance
- Apospory Expressivity and Segregation in Intraspecific Hybrids of Paspalum notatum Flügge
BibTeX
@misc{adorante2026computational,
title = {{The Computational Value of Sensory-Aligned Receptive Fields Depends on Neuronal Expressivity}},
author = {Agnese Adorante and Aaron Spieler and Anna Levina},
howpublished = {arXiv},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2609.26940},
eprint = {2609.26940},
archivePrefix = {arXiv},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26940},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - The Computational Value of Sensory-Aligned Receptive Fields Depends on Neuronal Expressivity
AU - Agnese Adorante
AU - Aaron Spieler
AU - Anna Levina
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/22
PB - arXiv
DO - 10.48550/arxiv.2609.26940
UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.26940
AB - Biological sensory neurons have selective receptive fields organized along meaningful stimulus coordinates, such as frequency, motion direction, or retinotopic position. Such structure may arise from efficient coding and biological constraints on activity, connectivity, and wiring, as computational studies of simple neurons have shown across modalities. This raises a question: do structured receptive fields confer a computational advantage beyond resource efficiency itself, and does this advantage persist when individual neurons are highly expressive? We address this question in recurrent networks of Expressive Leaky Memory neurons, where we can independently vary neuronal complexity and the organization of feed-forward receptive fields. Across auditory and event-based visual classification tasks, receptive fields aligned with a task-relevant sensory coordinate improve test accuracy relative to budget-matched random receptive fields. This advantage disappears when sensory coordinates are scrambled, or when receptive fields follow task-irrelevant coordinates, showing that the benefit comes from alignment with task geometry rather than restricted connectivity alone. Increasing neuronal complexity reduces the performance advantage of structured receptive fields. Finally, generic synaptic sparsity regularization induces input selectivity and partially recovers performance, but remains substantially below explicitly structured receptive fields, suggesting that sparsity alone is insufficient to recover the full computational benefit of task-aligned receptive fields. Together, our results show that appropriate receptive fields can serve as a computational prior beyond sparsity itself, and that their value depends on the computational expressivity of individual neurons.
ER -