Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,869 studies31 sourcesUpdated 44 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Polygenic Risk Scores and Digital Devices for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention: INNOPREV Trial

Abstract

Background: The INNOPREV (INNOvative approaches for personalized cardiovascular PREVention) trial is a multicentre RCT evaluating prevention strategies integrating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) and digital health technologies for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.

Methods: Participants were enrolled across three Italian centres (Rome, Catania and Palermo) and randomized into four groups: usual care, digital, genetic (PRS-based) and combined intervention (digital and genetic). Follow-up occurred over 12 months (baseline T0; 6-month T1; 12-month T2). Recruitment is finished while follow-up is still on-going. Study endpoints concern lifestyle changes, assessed through Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) questionnaire, reflecting cardiovascular health (CVH) profiles, SCORE2 and lipid profile changes. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed effects models (LMM) to evaluate the marginal effect of adding at least one intervention or both with respect to usual care.

Results: 1032 participants were enrolled, 813 (79%) completed T1, 687 participants (67%) completed T2, while 132 (13%) participants withdrew from the study. At T0, CVH was low, intermediate, and high in 10%, 83%, and 7% of participants; PRS risk was normal, intermediate, and high in 76%, 22%, and 2%, respectively. No significant association was observed between CVH categories and PRS risk. LE8 scores increased by + 2.3 points at T1 (p < 0.05) and +2.6 points at T2 (p < 0.05) compared to T0 among all participants. No significant differences emerged between intervention arms at either timepoint. SCORE2 showed no significant changes at T2. Total cholesterol remained unchanged across arms, while initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction at T2 (−23.3 mg/dL; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: A modest but significant improvement in lifestyle was observed at 6 and 12 months among all participants, regardless of any intervention assignment. Funded by NextGenerationEU. CUP: C53C22001100007.

Key messages: • Genetic-digital strategies did not outperform usual care in this RCT, highlighting the need to optimize implementation to unlock the full potential of personalized CVD prevention.

• Genetic predisposition and cardiovascular health profile are not correlated, supporting their combined use for a more complete risk assessment.

Related

  1. Multidisciplinary evaluation of Polygenic Risk Score and Digital Health in Cardiovascular Prevention
    C De Waure, I Valentini, N Scarsi +6
    The European Journal of Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0Full textEpidemiology & public healthPMCEurope PMC
  2. Utility of a coronary artery disease polygenic risk score in a low-risk primary prevention cohort
    John H. Bertot, Giorgio E.M. Melloni, James Pirruccello +6
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  3. Coronary artery disease polygenic risk score and recurrent cardiovascular events after coronary artery revascularization: A UK Biobank analysis
    Aman Goyal, Zhuqing Shi, Manan Pareek +10
    American journal of preventive cardiologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  4. Chlorhexidine plus alcohol versus povidone iodine plus alcohol, combined or not with innovative devices, for prevention of short-term peripheral venous catheter infection and failure (CLEAN 3 study): an investigator-initiated, open-label, single centre, randomised-controlled, two-by-two factorial trial
    Jérémy Guenezan, Nicolas Marjanovic, Bertrand Drugeon +11
    The Lancet Infectious DiseasesPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull text64 citedGeneral biologyInfectious diseaseHAL
  5. Comparative and synergistic effects of digital devices and Child Life services in pediatric clinical practice: a systematic review
    Jia Deng, Liping Wu, Shun Zhang +3
    Translational pediatricsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{galarducci2026polygenic,
  title = {{Polygenic Risk Scores and Digital Devices for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention: INNOPREV Trial}},
  author = {R Galarducci and L Russo and L Proto and W Mazzucco and A Agodi and C De Waure and AM Pezzullo and G Liuzzo and R Pastorino and S Boccia},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1845},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1845},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Polygenic Risk Scores and Digital Devices for Primary Cardiovascular Prevention: INNOPREV Trial
AU  - R Galarducci
AU  - L Russo
AU  - L Proto
AU  - W Mazzucco
AU  - A Agodi
AU  - C De Waure
AU  - AM Pezzullo
AU  - G Liuzzo
AU  - R Pastorino
AU  - S Boccia
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1845
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.1845
AB  - Background: The INNOPREV (INNOvative approaches for personalized cardiovascular PREVention) trial is a multicentre RCT evaluating prevention strategies integrating Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) and digital health technologies for primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention.  Methods: Participants were enrolled across three Italian centres (Rome, Catania and Palermo) and randomized into four groups: usual care, digital, genetic (PRS-based) and combined intervention (digital and genetic). Follow-up occurred over 12 months (baseline T0; 6-month T1; 12-month T2). Recruitment is finished while follow-up is still on-going. Study endpoints concern lifestyle changes, assessed through Life’s Essential 8 (LE8) questionnaire, reflecting cardiovascular health (CVH) profiles, SCORE2 and lipid profile changes. Analyses were conducted using linear mixed effects models (LMM) to evaluate the marginal effect of adding at least one intervention or both with respect to usual care.  Results: 1032 participants were enrolled, 813 (79%) completed T1, 687 participants (67%) completed T2, while 132 (13%) participants withdrew from the study. At T0, CVH was low, intermediate, and high in 10%, 83%, and 7% of participants; PRS risk was normal, intermediate, and high in 76%, 22%, and 2%, respectively. No significant association was observed between CVH categories and PRS risk. LE8 scores increased by + 2.3 points at T1 (p < 0.05) and +2.6 points at T2 (p < 0.05) compared to T0 among all participants. No significant differences emerged between intervention arms at either timepoint. SCORE2 showed no significant changes at T2. Total cholesterol remained unchanged across arms, while initiation of lipid-lowering therapy was associated with a significant reduction at T2 (−23.3 mg/dL; p < 0.001).  Conclusions: A modest but significant improvement in lifestyle was observed at 6 and 12 months among all participants, regardless of any intervention assignment. Funded by NextGenerationEU. CUP: C53C22001100007.  Key messages: • Genetic-digital strategies did not outperform usual care in this RCT, highlighting the need to optimize implementation to unlock the full potential of personalized CVD prevention.  • Genetic predisposition and cardiovascular health profile are not correlated, supporting their combined use for a more complete risk assessment.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -