Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education in surgery - a scoping review.
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. [email protected].
- 2Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia. [email protected].
- 3Division of Surgery, Anaesthesia, and Procedural Medicine, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
- 4Department of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Austin Precinct, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, VIC, 3084, Australia.
- 5Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, LSU Health New Orleans, 2021 Perdido Street, 8th floor, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Abstract
Introduction
Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) has been successfully used in various health professions and shown to improve communication and teamwork. Surgery, where preventable serious adverse outcomes are often attributed to issues with communication and teamwork, represents a compelling context for Sim-IPE. However, implementing Sim-IPE in surgery requires investment in faculty development, equipment and facilities while incurring the cost of reduced staff availability and theatre productivity during simulation activity. We conducted a scoping review to characterise how Sim-IPE in surgery is practised and researched.Methods
This scoping review followed the methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley. Reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and ERIC) were searched for records pertaining to Sim-IPE in surgery published after 1st January 2000 and in English.Results
The final analysis included 81 articles. Simulation scenarios showed a rich variety of combinations of professions, disciplines, training levels and settings. While most scenarios used manikins (N = 54, 75%), other modalities included simulated participants, cadavers, task trainers, computers, laparoscopic simulators, role play and animal models with many scenarios using multiple modalities (N = 20, 27.8%). Of studies reporting on evaluation outcome, almost half (N = 32, 47.1%) were limited to participants' views of their learning experience and satisfaction with the program. Few studies reported using educational theory to inform Sim-IPE design and even fewer used theoretical frameworks in the research design. Facilitators for implementing Sim-IPE in surgery included a skilled faculty, institutional support and evidence of benefit. Barriers included lack of protected training time, restricted access to facilities and unreliable ongoing funding.Discussion
Studies described a rich variety of Sim-IPE scenarios, including multiple professions, disciplines, training levels, simulation modalities and settings, facilitating training in a broad range of skills reflective of the complexity of modern surgical care. While barriers such as time, funding, and cultural resistance to simulation are commonly reported in the simulation-based education literature, these issues may be amplified in surgery due to surgical service pressures and traditional hierarchies (e.g. surgeon as "captain of the ship"). Overcoming these barriers will likely require structural (policy, funding, scheduling) and cultural (leadership, team identity) change.
Related
- Mapping Complexity Lenses in Interprofessional Education and Collaborative Practice: A Scoping Review.
- From clinics to communities: a scoping review of interprofessional service-learning in undergraduate dental education
- Integrating nutrition counseling into clinical skills training: a simulation-based interprofessional education program for medical and nursing students
- Strengths and challenges faced on the implementation of global surgery education courses: a scoping review
- Simulation‐Based Education for Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Emergency Procedures in the South Pacific: A Pilot Study
BibTeX
@article{stevens2026simulationenhanced,
title = {{Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education in surgery - a scoping review.}},
author = {Sean Stevens and Oscar Morice and Deborah Colville and Vijayaragavan Muralidharan and John Paige and Debra Nestel},
journal = {Advances in simulation (London, England)},
year = {2026},
month = jul,
doi = {10.1186/s41077-026-00453-8},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897701},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education in surgery - a scoping review.
AU - Sean Stevens
AU - Oscar Morice
AU - Deborah Colville
AU - Vijayaragavan Muralidharan
AU - John Paige
AU - Debra Nestel
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/07/01
JO - Advances in simulation (London, England)
DO - 10.1186/s41077-026-00453-8
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42897701
AB - Introduction Simulation-enhanced interprofessional education (Sim-IPE) has been successfully used in various health professions and shown to improve communication and teamwork. Surgery, where preventable serious adverse outcomes are often attributed to issues with communication and teamwork, represents a compelling context for Sim-IPE. However, implementing Sim-IPE in surgery requires investment in faculty development, equipment and facilities while incurring the cost of reduced staff availability and theatre productivity during simulation activity. We conducted a scoping review to characterise how Sim-IPE in surgery is practised and researched.Methods This scoping review followed the methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley. Reporting followed the PRISMA-ScR checklist. Electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and ERIC) were searched for records pertaining to Sim-IPE in surgery published after 1st January 2000 and in English.Results The final analysis included 81 articles. Simulation scenarios showed a rich variety of combinations of professions, disciplines, training levels and settings. While most scenarios used manikins (N = 54, 75%), other modalities included simulated participants, cadavers, task trainers, computers, laparoscopic simulators, role play and animal models with many scenarios using multiple modalities (N = 20, 27.8%). Of studies reporting on evaluation outcome, almost half (N = 32, 47.1%) were limited to participants' views of their learning experience and satisfaction with the program. Few studies reported using educational theory to inform Sim-IPE design and even fewer used theoretical frameworks in the research design. Facilitators for implementing Sim-IPE in surgery included a skilled faculty, institutional support and evidence of benefit. Barriers included lack of protected training time, restricted access to facilities and unreliable ongoing funding.Discussion Studies described a rich variety of Sim-IPE scenarios, including multiple professions, disciplines, training levels, simulation modalities and settings, facilitating training in a broad range of skills reflective of the complexity of modern surgical care. While barriers such as time, funding, and cultural resistance to simulation are commonly reported in the simulation-based education literature, these issues may be amplified in surgery due to surgical service pressures and traditional hierarchies (e.g. surgeon as "captain of the ship"). Overcoming these barriers will likely require structural (policy, funding, scheduling) and cultural (leadership, team identity) change.
SN - 2059-0628
ER -