Peer-reviewedLicence not statedJAMA
Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement
5 affiliations
- 1Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- 3Department of Gynecology, Norrtälje Hospital, Norrtälje, Sweden
- 4School of Health and Welfare, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden
- 5Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Related
- Melatonin Supplementation During Middle Gestation Alleviates Intrauterine Growth Restriction in Piglets and Is Associated with Alterations in Placental DNA Methylation
- Fluoroscopic Catheter-Tip Positioning During Internal Jugular TIVAD Placement in Breast Cancer: A Two-Center Retrospective Cohort Study
- Vena cava filter placement during pregnancy: a therapeutic challenge
- Effects of Probiotic Supplementation on Performance Retention During Detraining and Recovery After Simulated Return-to-Training Stress in College Volleyball Players: An Exploratory Randomized, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
- Early recognition and safe management of unintentional intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter during combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia: a case report in the context of the 2024 OAA guidelines.
BibTeX
@article{elgemark2026intrauterine,
title = {{Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement}},
author = {Karin Elgemark and Niklas Envall and Helena Kopp Kallner},
journal = {JAMA},
year = {2026},
month = sep,
doi = {10.1001/jama.2026.14217},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.14217},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Intrauterine Mepivacaine Instillation vs Placebo for Pain During IUD Placement
AU - Karin Elgemark
AU - Niklas Envall
AU - Helena Kopp Kallner
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/09/17
JO - JAMA
DO - 10.1001/jama.2026.14217
UR - https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2026.14217
SN - 0098-7484
SN - 1538-3598
ER -