Rapid health assessment of coral reefs: a standardised, quick, and reliable tool developed and tested during the 2024/25 global bleaching event
Abstract
Coral reefs worldwide are experiencing increasingly frequent and severe degradation events driven by rising sea surface temperatures, yet reliable and scientifically comparable data remain sparse for many coral reefs. Park managers, rangers, and community-led groups in areas lacking scientific studies could contribute to data records by collecting relevant data on coral reefs. However, these stakeholders often face logistical constraints that limit their ability to undertake ecological surveys and assess coral reef conditions in ways that are comparable to scientifically collected records. Here, we demonstrate a rapid health assessment protocol that is comparable to traditional, scientific methods, enabling stakeholders other than scientists to contribute robust data on coral bleaching to global-scale analyses. This protocol combines existing citizen science tools with standardised sampling approaches to generate monitoring high-quality data quickly. We compare estimates derived from the proposed methodology with those obtained with the traditional, research-grade, long-term photoquadrat-based coral reef monitoring approach across two distinct and understudied Australian coral reef ecosystems, Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island. We show that the rapid health assessment methodology provides data comparable to photoquadrats, although some divergences may arise. For example, the rapid health assessment is less likely to detect sparsely distributed conditions, such as partial mortality within coral colonies, compared with methods that assess the benthos in detail. Our study improves accessibility for coral reef stakeholders, allowing them to contribute data to coral reef health monitoring and global monitoring databases.
Related
- Cognitive Assessment Tools Developed or Adapted for Indigenous Populations in North America, South America, and Oceania: A Systematic Review
- Impact of structured sexual health training incorporating standardised patients on health professions students’ sexual health communication competence: A single-blind randomised controlled trial in Tanzania
- Valid and Reliable? Basic and Expanded Recommendations for Psychometric Reporting and Quality Assessment
- Multicenter Assessment of Combined Brain and Cervical Spinal cord 3T MP2RAGE T1 Measurements for Reliable Tissue Microstructure Quantification
- Delayed bleaching-induced coral mortality limits reef recovery after a marine heatwave
BibTeX
@misc{pollo2026rapid,
title = {{Rapid health assessment of coral reefs: a standardised, quick, and reliable tool developed and tested during the 2024/25 global bleaching event}},
author = {Pietro Pollo and Paige Sawyers and Justin Gilligan and Caitlin Woods and William Leggat and Tracy Ainsworth},
howpublished = {EcoEvoRxiv},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.32942/x2z412},
url = {https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15785/},
note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY - UNPB
TI - Rapid health assessment of coral reefs: a standardised, quick, and reliable tool developed and tested during the 2024/25 global bleaching event
AU - Pietro Pollo
AU - Paige Sawyers
AU - Justin Gilligan
AU - Caitlin Woods
AU - William Leggat
AU - Tracy Ainsworth
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/27
PB - EcoEvoRxiv
DO - 10.32942/x2z412
UR - https://ecoevorxiv.org/repository/view/15785/
AB - Coral reefs worldwide are experiencing increasingly frequent and severe degradation events driven by rising sea surface temperatures, yet reliable and scientifically comparable data remain sparse for many coral reefs. Park managers, rangers, and community-led groups in areas lacking scientific studies could contribute to data records by collecting relevant data on coral reefs. However, these stakeholders often face logistical constraints that limit their ability to undertake ecological surveys and assess coral reef conditions in ways that are comparable to scientifically collected records. Here, we demonstrate a rapid health assessment protocol that is comparable to traditional, scientific methods, enabling stakeholders other than scientists to contribute robust data on coral bleaching to global-scale analyses. This protocol combines existing citizen science tools with standardised sampling approaches to generate monitoring high-quality data quickly. We compare estimates derived from the proposed methodology with those obtained with the traditional, research-grade, long-term photoquadrat-based coral reef monitoring approach across two distinct and understudied Australian coral reef ecosystems, Lord Howe Island and Norfolk Island. We show that the rapid health assessment methodology provides data comparable to photoquadrats, although some divergences may arise. For example, the rapid health assessment is less likely to detect sparsely distributed conditions, such as partial mortality within coral colonies, compared with methods that assess the benthos in detail. Our study improves accessibility for coral reef stakeholders, allowing them to contribute data to coral reef health monitoring and global monitoring databases.
ER -