Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 46 min ago
PreprintCC BY-SA 4.0arXiv

Not just a phase: detecting nanohertz gravitational waves from phase alone

Abstract

Unambiguously detecting a gravitational-wave background (GWB) in pulsar-timing data requires a robust detection statistic. The pulsar timing community currently relies heavily on the cross-correlation-based "optimal statistic." Its design was motivated to avoid false-positive detections from unmodeled pulsar red noise. However, recent work by van Haasteren (2025) suggests that the optimal statistic is not, in fact, optimal. Moreover, the optimal statistic is still susceptible to false positives from misspecified noise. To guard against this, analysts employ quasi-resampling methods such as phase shifts, in which complex phases are randomly assigned to each pulsar strain measurement, thereby destroying any gravitational-wave-induced correlations. Inspired by the concept of phase shifts, we introduce a formalism in which the GWB is measured entirely from phase measurements. We argue that this approach is robust against false positive detections without the need for ad hoc quasi-resampling methods. We demonstrate the feasibility of this formalism by measuring the amplitude and spectral index of a simulated GWB, injected to a simplified mock representation of a pulsar timing array data set. For this example, we use simulation-based-inference and model the phase-based likelihood using a neural circular spline flow. We show that it is possible to adequately recover the spectral parameters of the gravitational wave background signal using the phase-based likelihood. By comparing our results to ones obtained with the optimal statistic, we show how much resolving power comes from amplitude versus phase.

Related

  1. Joint Angular-Power Distributions of Interfering Nanohertz Gravitational Waves
    Yan-Chen Bi, Yu-Mei Wu, Qing-Guo Huang
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  2. Gravitational Waves from Dimension-6 Assisted Peccei - Quinn Phase Transitions
    Nico Benincasa, Kristjan Müürsepp
    HALPreprintLicence not statedGeneral astronomyHigh-energy & particle physicsHAL
  3. Interpretation of Nanohertz Gravitational Waves via Cosmic Strings in Post-BBN Matter and Kination Domination
    Raymond T. Co, Siu Cheung Lam, Taegyu Lee
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
  4. Singlet Extended Mirror Standard Model World as Dark Matter and Gravitational Waves Imprints of a High Scale Mirror Phase Transitions
    Asterios T. Papadopoulos, V. K. Oikonomou
    arXivPreprintarXiv licenceFull textCosmologyGravitation & general relativityarXiv
  5. Enhancing Gravitational Waves from Global Strings via a First-Order Phase Transition
    Yongtao Jia, Ligong Bian, Huai-Ke Guo
    arXivPreprintCC BY 4.0Full textCosmologyHigh-energy & particle physicsarXiv
BibTeX
@misc{grunthal2026just,
  title = {{Not just a phase: detecting nanohertz gravitational waves from phase alone}},
  author = {Kathrin Grunthal and Eric Thrane and Rutger van Haasteren and David J. Champion and Michael Kramer},
  howpublished = {arXiv},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.48550/arxiv.2610.06178},
  eprint = {2610.06178},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06178},
  note = {CC BY-SA 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - UNPB
TI  - Not just a phase: detecting nanohertz gravitational waves from phase alone
AU  - Kathrin Grunthal
AU  - Eric Thrane
AU  - Rutger van Haasteren
AU  - David J. Champion
AU  - Michael Kramer
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
PB  - arXiv
DO  - 10.48550/arxiv.2610.06178
UR  - https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.06178
AB  - Unambiguously detecting a gravitational-wave background (GWB) in pulsar-timing data requires a robust detection statistic. The pulsar timing community currently relies heavily on the cross-correlation-based "optimal statistic." Its design was motivated to avoid false-positive detections from unmodeled pulsar red noise. However, recent work by van Haasteren (2025) suggests that the optimal statistic is not, in fact, optimal. Moreover, the optimal statistic is still susceptible to false positives from misspecified noise. To guard against this, analysts employ quasi-resampling methods such as phase shifts, in which complex phases are randomly assigned to each pulsar strain measurement, thereby destroying any gravitational-wave-induced correlations. Inspired by the concept of phase shifts, we introduce a formalism in which the GWB is measured entirely from phase measurements. We argue that this approach is robust against false positive detections without the need for ad hoc quasi-resampling methods. We demonstrate the feasibility of this formalism by measuring the amplitude and spectral index of a simulated GWB, injected to a simplified mock representation of a pulsar timing array data set. For this example, we use simulation-based-inference and model the phase-based likelihood using a neural circular spline flow. We show that it is possible to adequately recover the spectral parameters of the gravitational wave background signal using the phase-based likelihood. By comparing our results to ones obtained with the optimal statistic, we show how much resolving power comes from amplitude versus phase.
ER  -