Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
203,234 studies31 sourcesUpdated 7 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Immunology

Inhaled treatment adherence patterns and related barriers across three monthly follow-up waves among patients with cough variant asthma: a clinical natural language processing study

  1. 1Affiliated Haiyan Hospital of Jiaxing University, Haiyan People’s Hospital
  2. 2School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To characterize adherence and adherence-related text features across three monthly telephone follow-ups among adults with cough variant asthma (CVA) newly initiating maintenance inhaled therapy and to evaluate their contemporaneous associations.

Methods: This single-center, three-wave observational cohort classified adherence during the preceding month as high or low based on reported treatment implementation; records with insufficient information were unevaluable. A manually validated, rule-enhanced clinical natural language processing approach extracted seven non-mutually exclusive text features, including four prespecified patient-perceived barriers. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimated population-averaged contemporaneous associations with high adherence. Complete-case GEE and wave-specific Firth models were conducted as sensitivity analyses.

Results: Among 767 patients, adherence was evaluable for 732, 697, and 602 at Waves 1, 2, and 3, respectively; high adherence was documented in 94.4%, 73.9%, and 47.0% of evaluable records. Intentional discontinuation or dose reduction increased from 4.8% to 26.5%. The primary GEE included 2,031 observations. Lower odds of high adherence were associated with access or financial barriers (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16–0.49; P<0.001), illness- or treatment-related beliefs (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.63; P = 0.007), and side-effect concerns or poor tolerability (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.96; P = 0.040). Similar associations for access or financial barriers and illness- or treatment-related beliefs were observed in the complete-case and Wave 3 Firth analyses.

Conclusions: High adherence was documented less frequently and patient-initiated treatment reduction more frequently at later waves. Access or financial barriers showed the most consistent contemporaneous association with lower odds of high adherence, whereas associations with illness- or treatment-related beliefs and side-effect concerns were less consistent across analyses. These record-based observational findings require prospective confirmation.

Related

  1. Assessing germline genetic testing patterns, awareness, and adherence to guidelines among lebanese prostate cancer patients
    Samah Seif, Tala Najdi, Alain Chebly +4
    BMC UrologyPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0Full textGenetics & genomicsPMC
  2. Economic Burden and Treatment Patterns Among Patients Diagnosed With Vitiligo in Japan: An Observational Retrospective Cohort Study
    Naoki Oiso, Kent A. Hanson, Ahmed M. Soliman +7
    The Journal of DermatologyPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textCell biologyPMC
  3. Idiosyncratic Eye‐Movement Patterns to Faces Are Associated With Differences in Neural Processing: Evidence From Behavioral and Event‐Related Potential Responses
    Nianzeng Zhong, Janet H. Hsiao, Antoni B. Chan +1
    The European journal of neurosciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textNeuroscienceEurope PMC
  4. ADHERENCE PATTERNS AND THEIR DETERMINANTS TO CFTR MODULATORS IN FRANCE
    Oriane Talabart, Elia Eid, Marie Viprey +7
    Respiratory MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral biologyEpidemiology & public healthHALHAL
  5. Maintaining cognitive gains in type 2 diabetes: Barriers, supports, and patterns of strategy use
    Heather E. Cuevas, Jeeyeon Kim, Shenell T. Wood
    PLOS OnePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textNeuroscienceEndocrinology & metabolismPLOS
BibTeX
@article{zhang2026inhaled,
  title = {{Inhaled treatment adherence patterns and related barriers across three monthly follow-up waves among patients with cough variant asthma: a clinical natural language processing study}},
  author = {Chun-juan Zhang and Qiu-yue Shen and Xiu-juan Ma and Min-feng Zhou},
  journal = {Frontiers in Immunology},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fimmu.2026.1966303},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1966303/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Inhaled treatment adherence patterns and related barriers across three monthly follow-up waves among patients with cough variant asthma: a clinical natural language processing study
AU  - Chun-juan Zhang
AU  - Qiu-yue Shen
AU  - Xiu-juan Ma
AU  - Min-feng Zhou
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/05
JO  - Frontiers in Immunology
DO  - 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1966303
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1966303/full
AB  - Objective: To characterize adherence and adherence-related text features across three monthly telephone follow-ups among adults with cough variant asthma (CVA) newly initiating maintenance inhaled therapy and to evaluate their contemporaneous associations.  Methods: This single-center, three-wave observational cohort classified adherence during the preceding month as high or low based on reported treatment implementation; records with insufficient information were unevaluable. A manually validated, rule-enhanced clinical natural language processing approach extracted seven non-mutually exclusive text features, including four prespecified patient-perceived barriers. Logistic generalized estimating equations (GEE) estimated population-averaged contemporaneous associations with high adherence. Complete-case GEE and wave-specific Firth models were conducted as sensitivity analyses.  Results: Among 767 patients, adherence was evaluable for 732, 697, and 602 at Waves 1, 2, and 3, respectively; high adherence was documented in 94.4%, 73.9%, and 47.0% of evaluable records. Intentional discontinuation or dose reduction increased from 4.8% to 26.5%. The primary GEE included 2,031 observations. Lower odds of high adherence were associated with access or financial barriers (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16–0.49; P<0.001), illness- or treatment-related beliefs (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.06–0.63; P = 0.007), and side-effect concerns or poor tolerability (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19–0.96; P = 0.040). Similar associations for access or financial barriers and illness- or treatment-related beliefs were observed in the complete-case and Wave 3 Firth analyses.  Conclusions: High adherence was documented less frequently and patient-initiated treatment reduction more frequently at later waves. Access or financial barriers showed the most consistent contemporaneous association with lower odds of high adherence, whereas associations with illness- or treatment-related beliefs and side-effect concerns were less consistent across analyses. These record-based observational findings require prospective confirmation.
SN  - 1664-3224
ER  -