Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
201,818 studies31 sourcesUpdated 23 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC 4.0The European Journal of Public Health

Beyond “foreign vs Portuguese”: migrant-origin inequities in abortion care in Portugal, 2015–2024

Abstract

Background: Abortion care offers a key opportunity for effective contraception and prevention of repeat unintended pregnancies. In Portugal, the proportion of abortions among foreign women nearly rose from 18.2% in 2014 to 39.6% in 2024 while national indicators suggest worsening post-abortion contraceptive follow-up. Evidence on reproductive inequities by migratory status remains scarce in Europe.

Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using national abortion registry data for all legal abortions performed in women aged 15–49 years in Portugal, 2015–2024. The primary exposure was nationality (Portuguese vs foreign), with secondary analyses by migrant-origin group. Outcomes were repeat abortion and post-abortion contraception (classified as LARC, no-method, other methods). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were estimated using Poisson regression controlling for age, education, employment, cohabitation, parity and calendar year. Time trends were modelled using segmented regression.

Results: No-method contraceptive uptake after abortion rose from 4.4% in 2015 to 10.0% in 2024, with no overall difference between Portuguese and foreign women (aPR 1.04, 95%CI 1.00–1.08). Repeat abortion was more frequent among foreign women (32.3% vs 28.6%; aPR 1.10, 95%CI 1.08–1.12), but this gap narrowed over time. Migrant-origin group analyses showed heterogeneity: women from Portuguese-speaking African countries had higher repeat abortion (aPR 1.37, 95%CI 1.34–1.41) but lower no-method uptake (aPR 0.73, 95%CI 0.68–0.79), whereas Brazilian women had lower repeat abortion (aPR 0.69, 95%CI 0.66–0.72) and higher LARC use (aPR 1.23, 95%CI 1.20–1.27).

Conclusions: Contrasting patterns across migrant-origin groups point to distinct pathways of reproductive inequity obscured by a single “foreign vs Portuguese” lens. Health services in European countries with growing migrant populations require culturally tailored strategies to ensure equitable reproductive care.

Key messages: • Effective post-abortion contraception can help reduce unintended pregnancies and strengthen family planning.

• Different migrant-origin groups need tailored, equitable abortion and contraceptive care.

Related

  1. Vaccination Inequities Among Foreign-Born Adults in the United States: The Role of Citizenship, Socioeconomic Disadvantage, and Healthcare Access in the 2024 National Health Interview Survey.
    Gulzar Shah, Indira Karibayeva
    Tropical medicine and infectious diseasePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. Travel time modelling of access to surgical abortion services in Australia: A nationwide spatial analysis of distance, geographic, and socio-economic inequities
    Sarah M. Wood, Anna Noonan, Neil T. Coffee +1
    Women's HealthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  3. AI exposure and task detachability: migrant anchoring and work-linked health protection among highly educated foreign-born adults in the United States.
    Tse Hou Hew, Rajah Rasiah, Nina Xie
    Frontiers in public healthPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMCCrossref
  4. Measuring self-care in pregnant women: psychometric study of the Portuguese self-care inventory
    Nuno Ferreira, Manuela Ferreira, Eduardo Santos +3
    BMC Public HealthPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Epidemiology & public healthCrossref
  5. Exploring Dual-Factor Mental Health Profiles in Portuguese Therapeutic Residential Care: Distinguishing Clinical and Sub-Clinical Subgroups Among Females
    Emma Castro, Eunice Magalhães, Patrício Costa +1
    Journal of Child & Adolescent TraumaPeer-reviewedLicence not statedFull textPsychiatry & mental healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{pinheiro2026beyond,
  title = {{Beyond “foreign vs Portuguese”: migrant-origin inequities in abortion care in Portugal, 2015–2024}},
  author = {J Pinheiro and F Aparício and R Tomaz and A Peralta Santos and D Oliveira},
  journal = {The European Journal of Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.528},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.528},
  note = {CC BY-NC 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Beyond “foreign vs Portuguese”: migrant-origin inequities in abortion care in Portugal, 2015–2024
AU  - J Pinheiro
AU  - F Aparício
AU  - R Tomaz
AU  - A Peralta Santos
AU  - D Oliveira
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/01
JO  - The European Journal of Public Health
DO  - 10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.528
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckag169.528
AB  - Background: Abortion care offers a key opportunity for effective contraception and prevention of repeat unintended pregnancies. In Portugal, the proportion of abortions among foreign women nearly rose from 18.2% in 2014 to 39.6% in 2024 while national indicators suggest worsening post-abortion contraceptive follow-up. Evidence on reproductive inequities by migratory status remains scarce in Europe.  Methods: We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using national abortion registry data for all legal abortions performed in women aged 15–49 years in Portugal, 2015–2024. The primary exposure was nationality (Portuguese vs foreign), with secondary analyses by migrant-origin group. Outcomes were repeat abortion and post-abortion contraception (classified as LARC, no-method, other methods). Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) were estimated using Poisson regression controlling for age, education, employment, cohabitation, parity and calendar year. Time trends were modelled using segmented regression.  Results: No-method contraceptive uptake after abortion rose from 4.4% in 2015 to 10.0% in 2024, with no overall difference between Portuguese and foreign women (aPR 1.04, 95%CI 1.00–1.08). Repeat abortion was more frequent among foreign women (32.3% vs 28.6%; aPR 1.10, 95%CI 1.08–1.12), but this gap narrowed over time. Migrant-origin group analyses showed heterogeneity: women from Portuguese-speaking African countries had higher repeat abortion (aPR 1.37, 95%CI 1.34–1.41) but lower no-method uptake (aPR 0.73, 95%CI 0.68–0.79), whereas Brazilian women had lower repeat abortion (aPR 0.69, 95%CI 0.66–0.72) and higher LARC use (aPR 1.23, 95%CI 1.20–1.27).  Conclusions: Contrasting patterns across migrant-origin groups point to distinct pathways of reproductive inequity obscured by a single “foreign vs Portuguese” lens. Health services in European countries with growing migrant populations require culturally tailored strategies to ensure equitable reproductive care.  Key messages: • Effective post-abortion contraception can help reduce unintended pregnancies and strengthen family planning.  • Different migrant-origin groups need tailored, equitable abortion and contraceptive care.
SN  - 1101-1262
SN  - 1464-360X
ER  -