Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,787 studies31 sourcesUpdated 26 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Frontiers in Public Health

Burnout pathway differences across dual-track residency training: a network analysis

  1. 1Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, China International Neuroscience Institute (China-INI), Capital Medical University
  2. 2Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, Beijing Huguosi TCM Hospital, Affiliated with Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
  3. 3Department of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Hospital, Capital Medical University

Abstract

Background: China’s standardized residency training operates under a dual-track system: one track integrates clinical training with concurrent degree pursuit (student group), while the other is purely vocational without degree conferral (non-student group). Prior burnout research has largely relied on aggregate total or subscale scores, which cannot detect qualitative differences in symptom-to-symptom connectivity even when mean burnout severity is similar. Despite identical clinical rotations and competency requirements, it remains unclear whether these structurally distinct training pathways are associated with different burnout symptom-connectivity patterns, with direct implications for track-specific educational support.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from Fan et al.’s previously published cross-sectional survey of 636 residents from a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Burnout was measured using the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Networks were estimated using Graphical Lasso, and bridge centrality was computed to identify symptoms that most strongly connect burnout dimensions. Analyses were stratified by gender and specialty, and supplemented by logistic regression and bootstrap resampling.

Results: Non-students showed higher emotional exhaustion and lower personal accomplishment scores than students, whereas depersonalization scores did not differ significantly between groups. Burnout prevalence was higher among non-students (50.2% vs. 42.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, DP2 (“I don’t really care what happens to patients”) was the dominant bridge node. However, PA4 (“I don’t easily understand how my patients feel”) entered the top five bridge items only in non-students. Three of four subgroups followed the DP2 pathway, whereas non-student males showed a distinct pattern with PA4 as the most prominent feature (BS = 1.445). Logistic regression found no significant association between training identity and burnout status after adjustment (OR = 1.07; ΔAUC = +0.002, p = 0.68), whereas network analyses revealed distinct symptom-connectivity patterns.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that burnout prevention should account for training structure and institutional context. Rather than uniform wellness programs, medical education should offer track-specific support, particularly for residents whose burnout is characterized by empathy-related frustration rather than depersonalization.

Related

  1. Menopause Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Training: A Scoping Review
    O&G openPeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  2. The Influence of Sexual Identity on Sexual Harassment During Residency Training: A Survey Study
    Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviewsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textSurgery & anaesthesiaEurope PMC
  3. Training for impact: building physician workforce capacity through Vietnam's first internationally accredited competency-based residency programmes.
    Ryan J McAuley, Tuyet T Nguyen, Bryn M Carroll +6
    BMJ global healthPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthEurope PMC
  4. A narrative review of the decade-long integration of professional postgraduate education with standardized residency training in China
    Wenda Wang, Xin Zhao, Yi Zhao +2
    Frontiers in MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textEpidemiology & public healthDOAJ
  5. Training for Jobs That May Not Exist: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Medical Residency
    Madelyn Reilly, Jamal Hasoon, Alaa Abd-Elsayed
    Orthopedic ReviewsPeer-reviewedCC BY-NCFull textEpidemiology & public healthPMC
BibTeX
@article{guo2026burnout,
  title = {{Burnout pathway differences across dual-track residency training: a network analysis}},
  author = {Yuduo Guo and Xiaonan Meng and Sichang Chen and Xiaoning Lan and Haoyuan Guo and Mingchu Li},
  journal = {Frontiers in Public Health},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620},
  url = {https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620/full},
  note = {CC BY 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Burnout pathway differences across dual-track residency training: a network analysis
AU  - Yuduo Guo
AU  - Xiaonan Meng
AU  - Sichang Chen
AU  - Xiaoning Lan
AU  - Haoyuan Guo
AU  - Mingchu Li
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/13
JO  - Frontiers in Public Health
DO  - 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620
UR  - https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1921620/full
AB  - Background: China’s standardized residency training operates under a dual-track system: one track integrates clinical training with concurrent degree pursuit (student group), while the other is purely vocational without degree conferral (non-student group). Prior burnout research has largely relied on aggregate total or subscale scores, which cannot detect qualitative differences in symptom-to-symptom connectivity even when mean burnout severity is similar. Despite identical clinical rotations and competency requirements, it remains unclear whether these structurally distinct training pathways are associated with different burnout symptom-connectivity patterns, with direct implications for track-specific educational support.  Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of data from Fan et al.’s previously published cross-sectional survey of 636 residents from a Chinese tertiary teaching hospital. Burnout was measured using the 22-item Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Networks were estimated using Graphical Lasso, and bridge centrality was computed to identify symptoms that most strongly connect burnout dimensions. Analyses were stratified by gender and specialty, and supplemented by logistic regression and bootstrap resampling.  Results: Non-students showed higher emotional exhaustion and lower personal accomplishment scores than students, whereas depersonalization scores did not differ significantly between groups. Burnout prevalence was higher among non-students (50.2% vs. 42.4%), but this difference was not statistically significant. In both groups, DP2 (“I don’t really care what happens to patients”) was the dominant bridge node. However, PA4 (“I don’t easily understand how my patients feel”) entered the top five bridge items only in non-students. Three of four subgroups followed the DP2 pathway, whereas non-student males showed a distinct pattern with PA4 as the most prominent feature (BS = 1.445). Logistic regression found no significant association between training identity and burnout status after adjustment (OR = 1.07; ΔAUC = +0.002, p = 0.68), whereas network analyses revealed distinct symptom-connectivity patterns.  Conclusion: These findings suggest that burnout prevention should account for training structure and institutional context. Rather than uniform wellness programs, medical education should offer track-specific support, particularly for residents whose burnout is characterized by empathy-related frustration rather than depersonalization.
SN  - 2296-2565
ER  -