Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
197,768 studies31 sourcesUpdated 29 min ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-ND 4.0BMC Psychology

Development and psychometric validation of substance abuse prevention questionnaire based on the multi-theory model: construct validity and reliability

5 affiliations
  1. 1Faculty of Social Sciences, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
  2. 2Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Non-communicable Diseases Research Institute, Department of Health Education and Promotion, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  3. 3Department of Nursing Education, Research Center for Nursing and Midwifery Care, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  4. 4Department of Health Education and Promotion, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  5. 5Child Growth and Development Research Center, Research Institute for Primordial Prevention of Non- communicable Disease, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Abstract

Background: Substance abuse is one of the major social challenges worldwide. To address this issue, health promotion specialists are striving to overcome the limitations of existing health education models in promoting unhealthy behaviors. The relatively new Multi-Theory Model (MTM) has been introduced as a framework for changing unhealthy behaviors. However, no valid questionnaire based on this model is currently available for the prevention of substance abuse. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate a questionnaire based on the Multi-Theory Model for the prevention of substance abuse.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among 280 residents of the Akramieh neighborhood in Yazd, Iran. Participants were selected using a systematic sampling method. Based on a review of the existing scientific literature and a qualitative study, a measurement instrument was developed. The validity and reliability of the instrument were evaluated by an expert panel, and indices such as the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), face validity, factor analysis, internal consistency, convergent validity, and Cronbach’s alpha were calculated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and R software.

Results: Among the various constructs of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM), the construct with the highest factor loading was “change in the social environment” (27.41%). It was followed by “participatory dialogue: advantages” (9.58%) and “emotional transformation” (7.98%). The other constructs, in descending order of factor loading, included “change in the physical environment” (5.95%), “participatory dialogue: disadvantages” (4.10%), “behavioral confidence” (3.35%), and “practice for change” (3.16%). The model fit indices for the first-order model were as follows: CMIN/DF = 1.168, NFI = 0.955, RMSEA = 0.021, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.993, GFI = 0.968, IFI = 0.993. For the second-order model, the indices were: CMIN/DF = 1.624, NFI = 0.937, RMSEA = 0.040, CFI = 0.975, TLI = 0.973, GFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.975. Both models demonstrated a satisfactory level of goodness of fit.

Conclusion: The findings of this study provide strong evidence for the factorial structure and reliability of the developed measurement instrument. They demonstrate that the constructs of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) can be effectively measured through a rigorous psychometric process for the prevention of substance abuse. The results indicate that the developed questionnaire is useful for predicting related factors and designing preventive interventions in the field of substance abuse. Further studies aimed at optimizing the application of the MTM and organizing its constructs within the dual phases of initiation and sustenance would enhance the theoretical richness of the model.

Related

  1. Development and psychometric validation of the sun exposure and protection questionnaire (SEPQ) in young adults: a university-based validation study
    Sari Taha, Mohammad Darwaze, Nour Ghareeb +4
    Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textGeneral medicineCrossref
  2. Development and Psychometric Validation of a Multidimensional Questionnaire for Assessing Interpersonal Social Health
    Fardin Alipour, Hassan Rafiey, Mohammad Sabzi Khoshnami +1
    International Journal of Preventive MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-SAFull textGeneral medicineDOAJ
  3. Development, content validation and reliability assessment of the Bowel Irrigation Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Transanal Irrigation: a multi-methods study
    E. Farrow, R. Balachandran, R. Embleton +4
    medRxivPreprintCC BY-NCFull textSurgery & anaesthesiamedRxiv
  4. Factor structure and psychometric validation of the antenatal exercise knowledge, attitudes, and practices questionnaire : A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from Saudi Arabian pregnant women
    Abdullah Hussain Alzahrani, Wael Alghamdi
    MedicinePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
  5. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Comprehensive Protection, Quality, and Humanization in Pediatric Hospital Care
    Germán Rojas Loyola, Begoña Polonio-López, Juan José Criado-Alvarez +1
    Pediatric reportsPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textGeneral medicineEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{afshani2026development,
  title = {{Development and psychometric validation of substance abuse prevention questionnaire based on the multi-theory model: construct validity and reliability}},
  author = {Seyed Alireza Afshani and Nahid Ardian and Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad and Zahra Pourmovahed and Nooshin Yoshany and Masoomeh Goodarzi-Khoigani},
  journal = {BMC Psychology},
  year = {2026},
  month = aug,
  doi = {10.1186/s40359-026-05269-9},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05269-9},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND 4.0},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Development and psychometric validation of substance abuse prevention questionnaire based on the multi-theory model: construct validity and reliability
AU  - Seyed Alireza Afshani
AU  - Nahid Ardian
AU  - Seyed Saeed Mazloomy Mahmoodabad
AU  - Zahra Pourmovahed
AU  - Nooshin Yoshany
AU  - Masoomeh Goodarzi-Khoigani
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/08/07
JO  - BMC Psychology
DO  - 10.1186/s40359-026-05269-9
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05269-9
AB  - Background: Substance abuse is one of the major social challenges worldwide. To address this issue, health promotion specialists are striving to overcome the limitations of existing health education models in promoting unhealthy behaviors. The relatively new Multi-Theory Model (MTM) has been introduced as a framework for changing unhealthy behaviors. However, no valid questionnaire based on this model is currently available for the prevention of substance abuse. Accordingly, the present study was conducted to develop and psychometrically evaluate a questionnaire based on the Multi-Theory Model for the prevention of substance abuse.  Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among 280 residents of the Akramieh neighborhood in Yazd, Iran. Participants were selected using a systematic sampling method. Based on a review of the existing scientific literature and a qualitative study, a measurement instrument was developed. The validity and reliability of the instrument were evaluated by an expert panel, and indices such as the Content Validity Ratio (CVR), Content Validity Index (CVI), face validity, factor analysis, internal consistency, convergent validity, and Cronbach’s alpha were calculated. Data analysis was performed using SPSS and R software.  Results: Among the various constructs of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM), the construct with the highest factor loading was “change in the social environment” (27.41%). It was followed by “participatory dialogue: advantages” (9.58%) and “emotional transformation” (7.98%). The other constructs, in descending order of factor loading, included “change in the physical environment” (5.95%), “participatory dialogue: disadvantages” (4.10%), “behavioral confidence” (3.35%), and “practice for change” (3.16%). The model fit indices for the first-order model were as follows: CMIN/DF = 1.168, NFI = 0.955, RMSEA = 0.021, CFI = 0.993, TLI = 0.993, GFI = 0.968, IFI = 0.993. For the second-order model, the indices were: CMIN/DF = 1.624, NFI = 0.937, RMSEA = 0.040, CFI = 0.975, TLI = 0.973, GFI = 0.955, IFI = 0.975. Both models demonstrated a satisfactory level of goodness of fit.  Conclusion: The findings of this study provide strong evidence for the factorial structure and reliability of the developed measurement instrument. They demonstrate that the constructs of the Multi-Theory Model (MTM) can be effectively measured through a rigorous psychometric process for the prevention of substance abuse. The results indicate that the developed questionnaire is useful for predicting related factors and designing preventive interventions in the field of substance abuse. Further studies aimed at optimizing the application of the MTM and organizing its constructs within the dual phases of initiation and sustenance would enhance the theoretical richness of the model.
SN  - 2050-7283
ER  -