Journal indexation and predatory publishing: Publication literacy considerations for family medicine clinicians in Malaysia - A narrative perspective.
- 1Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- 2Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
- 3Department of Library and Information Science, Faculty of Arts and Social, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Abstract
Family medicine clinicians rely on published literature for clinical decision-making while facing growing expectations to publish for career progression and postgraduate training requirements. Although journal indexation is often used as a proxy for journal quality, this assumption is misleading given the rise of predatory publishing and evolving digital technologies. This narrative perspective discusses publication literacy considerations for family medicine clinicians in Malaysia, drawing primarily on general scholarly publishing guidance. Guidance from indexing organisations and publication ethics bodies was considered alongside selected scholarly literature and Malaysian resources. Discussion was organised around indexation, journal metrics, deceptive publishing practices and practical training. Information sources included Web of Science, Scopus, the National Library of Medicine, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and materials from Think. Check. Submit. Web of Science, Scopus and the Malaysian Citation Index have different coverage and purposes; their inclusion decisions do not guarantee article quality. Quartiles describe relative citation performance within a specified category and year. Indexing and metric claims should be checked through official sources alongside editorial policies, fees and journal suitability. General evidence about predatory publishing and artificial intelligence cannot establish the extent of these problems among Malaysian family medicine clinicians. Publication literacy can be incorporated into family medicine research training through supervised journal comparisons, documented verification before submission and collaboration with medical librarians. These proposed practices require evaluation in Malaysian postgraduate and departmental settings.
Related
- Use of Alcohol and Nicotine in the Context of cannabis Legalization: Considerations from a German Perspective.
- The Current Perspective, Ethical Considerations, and a Position Statement on Expanded Newborn Screening from the College of Paediatrics, Academy of Medicine of Malaysia.
- Publishing Quality Statistics Videos on YouTube: Analysis of Sources and Publishing Formats
- When promotion becomes a bounty on publications: how academic reward systems shape publication behavior, with lessons from Nepal
- Who Publishes During Residency? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Publication Among Residents in the United States
BibTeX
@article{jamaluddin2026journal,
title = {{Journal indexation and predatory publishing: Publication literacy considerations for family medicine clinicians in Malaysia - A narrative perspective.}},
author = {Jazlan Jamaluddin and Sheron Sir Loon Goh and Hooi Chin Beh and Karleen Chong and Ranita Hisham Shunmugam},
journal = {Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
doi = {10.51866/rv.26-00002},
url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999751},
note = {CC BY},
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
TI - Journal indexation and predatory publishing: Publication literacy considerations for family medicine clinicians in Malaysia - A narrative perspective.
AU - Jazlan Jamaluddin
AU - Sheron Sir Loon Goh
AU - Hooi Chin Beh
AU - Karleen Chong
AU - Ranita Hisham Shunmugam
PY - 2026
DA - 2026/10/23
JO - Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia
DO - 10.51866/rv.26-00002
UR - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42999751
AB - Family medicine clinicians rely on published literature for clinical decision-making while facing growing expectations to publish for career progression and postgraduate training requirements. Although journal indexation is often used as a proxy for journal quality, this assumption is misleading given the rise of predatory publishing and evolving digital technologies. This narrative perspective discusses publication literacy considerations for family medicine clinicians in Malaysia, drawing primarily on general scholarly publishing guidance. Guidance from indexing organisations and publication ethics bodies was considered alongside selected scholarly literature and Malaysian resources. Discussion was organised around indexation, journal metrics, deceptive publishing practices and practical training. Information sources included Web of Science, Scopus, the National Library of Medicine, the Directory of Open Access Journals, the Committee on Publication Ethics, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors and materials from Think. Check. Submit. Web of Science, Scopus and the Malaysian Citation Index have different coverage and purposes; their inclusion decisions do not guarantee article quality. Quartiles describe relative citation performance within a specified category and year. Indexing and metric claims should be checked through official sources alongside editorial policies, fees and journal suitability. General evidence about predatory publishing and artificial intelligence cannot establish the extent of these problems among Malaysian family medicine clinicians. Publication literacy can be incorporated into family medicine research training through supervised journal comparisons, documented verification before submission and collaboration with medical librarians. These proposed practices require evaluation in Malaysian postgraduate and departmental settings.
SN - 1985-207X
SN - 1985-2274
ER -