Skip to content
DraconiticResearch
Search Sources API
190,335 studies31 sourcesUpdated 1 h ago
Peer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDPoultry science

Net energy value of thirteen ingredients for broilers.

5 affiliations
  1. 1Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited (CPF), Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: [email protected].
  2. 2Biotechnology Research and Innovation Center, CP Innovation Center of Excellence, Charoen Pokphand Group, Bangkok, Thailand.
  3. 3Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited (CPF), Bangkok, Thailand.
  4. 4Adisseo France S.A.S., (retired), Antony, France.
  5. 5INRAE, (retired), France.

Abstract

The energy values of 13 raw ingredients (corn, wheat, paddy rice, broken rice, cassava pellet, full-fat soybean, soybean meal, canola meal, animal protein, rice bran, wheat bran, palm kernel meal, and palm kernel oil) were measured in broilers using a multiple regression method involving 23 diets. The inclusion levels of ingredients were variable and as independent as possible. Ross 308 male broilers were fed the 23 diets from 18 to 23 days of age in 12 open-circuit respiratory chambers (4 birds/chamber), with a minimum of eight replicates per diet. Apparent metabolizable energy (AME), AME corrected to zero nitrogen retention (AMEn) or for 60% nitrogen retention (AMEs) of diets, and heat production of the birds were measured, and diet net energy (NE) values were calculated. As expected, palm kernel oil showed the highest AME value. Among the cereals, the AME value (kcal/kg DM) was numerically higher for broken rice (4090) than for corn (3850) or wheat (3690). The AME values were lowest for the fiber- and protein-rich ingredients. The difference between AMEn and AME was 2 to 5% for most ingredients, but it was higher for high-protein ingredients such as animal protein, soybean meal, and canola meal (10 to 14%). The AMEs values were close (within ±3%) to the measured AME values. The AME efficiency for NE (NE/AME) varied from 55 to 60% for the fiber-rich canola meal and wheat bran to 86% for palm kernel oil; it averaged 79% for cereals and ranged from 70 to 80% for the other ingredients, according to their chemical composition. The ranking of ingredients differed among the AME (and AMEs), AMEn, and NE evaluation systems, which justifies the interest in moving to a NE system for poultry feeds. Finally, the measured NE values of the present study were consistent with those obtained from published NE prediction equations for most ingredients, validating the use of equations established on diets for predicting the NE content of ingredients.

Related

  1. Development of a performance-derived nutritional value for a microencapsulated gut health additive from a meta-analysis of 35 trials and its in vivo validation in broilers.
    Giulia Giovagnoni, Andrea Bonetti, Mauro Di Benedetto +3
    Frontiers in veterinary sciencePeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
  2. Evaluation of nutritive value of sorghum-based fermented distiller’s dried grain and its effects on growth performance and intestinal functions in broilers
    Hailin Huan, Junshu Yan, Yuanlu Tu +5
    Poultry SciencePeer-reviewedCC BY 4.0Full textZoology & animal behaviourPMC
  3. Low crude protein with moderate net energy and digestible lysine improves gut health and nutrient transport in broilers.
    Minhao Zhang, Li Chen, Tahir Mahmood +2
    Poultry sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
  4. Effects of Grain Source and Emulsifier Supplementation of Reduced-Energy Diets on Performance, Slaughter Traits, Tibia Characteristics, Jejunal Histomorphology and Pancreatic Enzymes in Broilers.
    Osman Olgun, Yusuf Cufadar, Seyit Ahmet Gökmen +3
    Animals : an open access journal from MDPIPeer-reviewedCC BYFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
  5. Effects of dietary net energy, crude protein, and standardized ileal digestible lysine on growth performance, nitrogen utilization, and hepatic metabolism in 22-35 day-old broilers.
    Yao Yu, Caiwei Luo, Tahir Mahmood +3
    Poultry sciencePeer-reviewedCC BY-NC-NDFull textZoology & animal behaviourEurope PMC
BibTeX
@article{tayzar2026energy,
  title = {{Net energy value of thirteen ingredients for broilers.}},
  author = {A C Tay-Zar and M Wongphatcharachai and P Srichana and P A Geraert and J Noblet},
  journal = {Poultry science},
  year = {2026},
  month = oct,
  doi = {10.1016/j.psj.2026.107874},
  url = {https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42854501},
  note = {CC BY-NC-ND},
}
RIS
TY  - JOUR
TI  - Net energy value of thirteen ingredients for broilers.
AU  - A C Tay-Zar
AU  - M Wongphatcharachai
AU  - P Srichana
AU  - P A Geraert
AU  - J Noblet
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/10/02
JO  - Poultry science
DO  - 10.1016/j.psj.2026.107874
UR  - https://europepmc.org/article/MED/42854501
AB  - The energy values of 13 raw ingredients (corn, wheat, paddy rice, broken rice, cassava pellet, full-fat soybean, soybean meal, canola meal, animal protein, rice bran, wheat bran, palm kernel meal, and palm kernel oil) were measured in broilers using a multiple regression method involving 23 diets. The inclusion levels of ingredients were variable and as independent as possible. Ross 308 male broilers were fed the 23 diets from 18 to 23 days of age in 12 open-circuit respiratory chambers (4 birds/chamber), with a minimum of eight replicates per diet. Apparent metabolizable energy (AME), AME corrected to zero nitrogen retention (AMEn) or for 60% nitrogen retention (AMEs) of diets, and heat production of the birds were measured, and diet net energy (NE) values were calculated. As expected, palm kernel oil showed the highest AME value. Among the cereals, the AME value (kcal/kg DM) was numerically higher for broken rice (4090) than for corn (3850) or wheat (3690). The AME values were lowest for the fiber- and protein-rich ingredients. The difference between AMEn and AME was 2 to 5% for most ingredients, but it was higher for high-protein ingredients such as animal protein, soybean meal, and canola meal (10 to 14%). The AMEs values were close (within ±3%) to the measured AME values. The AME efficiency for NE (NE/AME) varied from 55 to 60% for the fiber-rich canola meal and wheat bran to 86% for palm kernel oil; it averaged 79% for cereals and ranged from 70 to 80% for the other ingredients, according to their chemical composition. The ranking of ingredients differed among the AME (and AMEs), AMEn, and NE evaluation systems, which justifies the interest in moving to a NE system for poultry feeds. Finally, the measured NE values of the present study were consistent with those obtained from published NE prediction equations for most ingredients, validating the use of equations established on diets for predicting the NE content of ingredients.
SN  - 0032-5791
SN  - 1525-3171
ER  -